Since the dawn of time, or since the dawn of me, there has been The Question.
Sometimes, The Question is asked ten times in the same day. Sometimes, I can go three or four months without any mention of The Question at all, but it always reappears, and often at the most unexpected moments (such as while washing my hands after attending to Nature’s call, or, on one singular memorable occasion, while in the second loop of the old Corkscrew rollercoaster at Alton Towers).
The Question in question is this; how do you speak so well for a Deaf person?
Beg pardon. I don’t speak well for a Deaf person, or a deaf person, or a passing sheep. I speak well for a person. I can speak English, and I can mutter French very badly. I can change my accent and ‘posh up’, but generally I stick to the common Derbyshire flattened-vowel mumblings I grew up with, my duckys.
The same is true of my signing; I can use BSL, or SSE, and I can flail through cued speech very badly, but I still have a Midlands lisp even with my hands.
I’m sure that little insight into my accent has fascinated you to distraction, but hold on! There is more to come! For ever since I came out from under the cover of various nom de plumes (that’s French, and I could speak it for you very badly) and began writing for our beloved Chicken, The Question has transformed; how do you write so well for a Deaf person?
Well, again; I don’t. I just write. If you mean my grasp of English grammar and stuff, well… I should first point out that I just wrote that as ‘grammer’, and then I should also point out that learning to use written English is a lot easier than learning to use written BSL, mainly because the latter doesn’t exist… And there’s far too much jollop in my head for me to never get any of it down somewhere.
Anyway. As ever, I am going as far off the intended point as my little man’s recent first bowl of porridge (intended point; his mouth. Actual destination; curtains, carpet, sofa, dog, fish tank… And we don’t even own a fish tank. Next door don’t even own a fish tank).
The Question, in any of its forms, has never really bothered me. I sometimes answer a bit sharply, or a bit sarcastically, but that’s just because I get asked so often that I like to inject a little variety. I have to remember that for this person asking, it’s the first time they’ve ever thought of it, even if it’s the ten millionth time I’ve answered…
So, I don’t get upset, even if I do get cheeky (“Well, having been brought up by wolves, at the back of the Industrial Estate, living on rats and Spam, the only way was up….”). In fact, I’ve grown to quite like questions in general. “How are you?” is a lovely way to start a new friendship. “Would you like some chocolate?” is even better. “Can I bow down and worship you for your skill at nappy wrangling?” is probably the ideal.
Can you feel a ‘but’ coming on? ‘Cause there is one. And it goes totally against my theme thus far of everything being ok!
Something is not ok. Something is rotten, not in the state of Denmark, but in the minds of people who perhaps don’t know better, or don’t want to know better, or simply can’t think outside the box enough to actually look at someone else’s life from that person’s perspective, instead of their own.
These people should probably be taken by the hand and shown the light, but actually they make me want to vomit on their shoes. They make me furious, and then I have to waste precious time calming down. Because it isn’t worth getting upset over, but sometimes you just can’t help it.
Forgive me if it offends you or you wanted something more whimsical from today’s Diary, but unfortunately life isn’t all whimsy and I guess, in order to be honest, I have to note down the junk as well as the jollop. So, forgive me, but today I basically want to say; No. That’s not ok, actually.
It’s not ok to notice I can’t hear my baby crying and tell me that makes me lucky.
It’s really, really, really, bloody not. OK?
Emily Howlett is a Contributing Editor to this site. She is a profoundly Deaf actress, writer, horsewoman and new mum. She describes herself as being “equally fluent in English, BSL and Gibberish, and completely rubbish at French.” Emily can be found all over the place on various escapades, but divides her time between Derby and London. She can often be found behind a large packet of crisps or any halfway decent book, and insists she can still play characters in their early twenties despite having a grey eyebrow hair.
The Limping Chicken’s supporters provide: sign language interpreting and communications support (Deaf Umbrella), online BSL video interpreting (SignVideo), captioning and speech-to-text services (121 Captions), online BSL tuition (Signworld), theatre captioning (STAGETEXT), Remote Captioning (Bee Communications), visual theatre with BSL (Krazy Kat) , healthcare support for Deaf people (SignHealth), theatre from a Deaf perspective (Deafinitely Theatre ), specialist lipspeaking support (Lipspeaker UK), Deaf television programmes online (SDHH), language and learning (Sign Solutions), sign language and Red Dot online video interpreting (Action Deafness Communications) education for Deaf children (Hamilton Lodge School in Brighton), and legal advice for Deaf people (RAD Deaf Law Centre).
Andy not Mr Palmer but another one
June 21, 2013
Nice bit of writing. I like your whimsical style, rather like a less whiny Liz Jones.
One thing that often strikes me about Deaf people is that many of them accept that inevitably their English will be bad. They say that hearing people have a great advantage in that they can hear English being spoken and thus learn more easily.
But while I accept that this may be true for some it does not seem to take into account a couple of glaring discrepancies in the reasoning. Firstly, spoken English is very different from written English. Surely you didn’t all think that Olde England went about declaiming in iambic pentameters?
Modern speech is a lot different to written speech in exactly the same way. There are usually far more swearwords. All hearing people like to pretend that bad language is Spawn of the Devil but just wait till they trap a finger in a door! The English that is spoken on Radio One for example is far from the English spoken in the Houses of Parliament. Different again is the language spoken as English in other countries. In the US the men wear the suspenders.
Secondly, there is strong evidence that people who read a lot of good literature have better English than those who do not. By good I mean the classical novels, plays and other writings. These are written in the type of language we are expected to aspire to. Nobody expects us to write like Chaucer or Shaky but, having read them we have a base on which to build our own grasp of language. All readers have to learn by progression. Some like me find it very easy and speed read half the time. Others find it almost impossibly hard. But surely that’s a challenge to be conquered not something to get a heart-ache over?
And this brings me to the point, really. Which is that few people are born with a great grasp of English. They have to work at it. They have to persevere, often over a period of many years. Just because they are hearing people doesn’t automatically mean that they translate the spoken word into excellent writing. There are hordes of hearing people out there who can’t write proper English. Hordes.
Becoming a good writer of English involves a lot of work. A lot of >reading<. It is a fallacy for people to assume that because they can't hear well then their English will inevitably be poor. The means are there, we can use them. To be honest, although my written English has always been good that is mainly because I simply memorised the language that I read. At one time I was accused of talking like a book. But developing a style, learning control and most of all learning to sub edit my own work has taken many years. I'm never going to be a great writer but I like to think of myself as at least competent and readable. It has taken countless hours of practice and thought.
Not too bad for someone with dyslexia, I think. In fact I have the rarer dyscalculia which is why I don't work for CERN. So, don't give up on the English too easily, it's not a gift for hearing people to learn and it will impress the hell out of everyone if you learn to be at least competent in written English.
KB1980
June 21, 2013
or “you don’t look deaf”. That’s a regular one. Now I reply: “did you expect me to have two heads or something?”
elysesalpeter
June 21, 2013
I wasn’t going to respond, but I’m going to. You seem angry and frustrated and I do understand. I have a child on the spectrum and people in my family with other disabilities. But, I’d rather people ask me “the question” a 1000 times so I can educate them. You’re right, people are insensitive and stupid and ask dumb things, but imagine if your response to that question was truly educational and the next time they speak to someone with some sort of disability, or meet someone who is deaf, or autistic or anything, they come from a point of educated understanding? They become the advocates of the future. As for the above comments, I’ve heard them too. “Your son doesn’t look autistic” is something I hear all the time. I cringe for a moment and then gently say “I’m glad because he worked really hard doing a lot of therapies to get here, I’m very proud of him.” Just saying.
deaflinguist
June 21, 2013
It’s a question that makes me deeply uncomfortable, whether the person talking to me is hearing or deaf. Whoever asks it, it’s always a backhanded compliment!
Irene Winn
June 23, 2013
My hero is the profoundly deaf gentleman who works at the Maelor hospital in Wrexham who not only speaks english with inflection, but has mastered welsh as well! But I hear you when you say that it is not lucky to be unable to hear your baby cry.
Oh Dear
June 24, 2013
The Question in question is this; how do you speak so well for a Deaf person?
Nothing wrong with the question. One does need to understand why the questioner asked the question. For every person who asked me that question, do so because they were making a comparison with a deaf person they know. In most cases, about 90%, the questioner had a member of a family who’s deaf and had difficulties in communicating when growing up. Hence when they meet deaf person who speaks well, they are naturally curious as to why? Curiosity IS part of human nature, part of a learning process.
Chill out and go with the flow.