It’s a sad fact that many of the people who need to read this article are those who, through no fault of their own, cannot.
It is for this reason these individuals remain “a silent minority” in Britain today and are treated so by the authorities.
Imagine being born in Britain, learning to communicate very effectively in a recognised manner, but then being told later in life you can’t access post 16 education. One could be forgiven for assuming such mistreatment came to an end during the post WW2 years of the 50’s and 60’s.
This issue first came to my attention during 2014, when a relative, who is profoundly deaf, started an engineering apprentice. He attended college on day-release, i.e. one day per week, and worked within the Company the remaining four days per week.
The college informed his employer that their apprentice was a good student, with both his practical work and theory knowledge to a high standard. He passed all his practical and theory exams at college for his Level 2 apprenticeship and his NVQ Level 2. Both his college and work attendance were 100%.
His employer also recognised they had a good, keen apprentice working above his level on a day-to-day basis. His enthusiasm and determination to learn were unsurpassable. But there was one problem, he was a British Sign Language (BSL) user and as a result of being deaf had limited access to English.
Current Government approach to post 16 education, insists certain core English qualifications must be successfully complete by all students. Any student who does not have a GCSE grade ‘C’ or above in English are required to successfully complete English “functional skills” before being allowed to commence or continue their chosen course of study, even if their first language is BSL.
One could understand this requirement in the case of English being the course of study, but NOT where English is just the method of communication. As a result, some deaf Students are effectively being cast aside and refused access because they, through no fault of their own, communicate in BSL and not English. This has got to be both fundamentally and morally wrong and must breach their human rights as individuals.
The fact this problem remains unraised at a National level, only points to the total lack of opportunities for deaf young people in society generally. Despite all the claims UK citizens have equal rights they do not. The requirement for BSL users, who are BSL qualified, to undertake functional skills in English in order to commence or continue on a course is wrong.
The Equality Act 2010, under discrimination arising from disability, places a duty on the Government to ensure they do not treat someone unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of their disability.
The Government claim BSL users are provided a level of “reasonable adjustment” when sitting functional skills English exams. However, these “reasonable adjustments” are interpreted differently throughout the country. Your right to “Reasonable Adjustments” can be a postcode lottery. Depending on where you live and the college you attend determines on what adjustment, if any, will be offered.
Things need to change. BSL users need to be treated with the respect they deserve and encouraged to make a contribution to society.
Rob has set up an email address should you wish to contact myself about this matter: BSLandEnglish@virginmedia.com
Rob Buxton is the parent of two profoundly deaf young adults. He says: “Often both my wife and myself feel we have spent most of our time arguing the case for better deaf education and opportunities. I’ve spent most of my life working in engineering including one well known international aero engine manufacture and in all this time I’ve only met two deaf engineers, one of whom being my son. Later in life I become a teacher. Whilst academic study is important we sadly no longer value practical skills and trades in this country. I would love to be able to make a real contribution to the deaf community and provide young deaf people with improved access to post 16 education in England. Currently, the way deaf students are treated is appalling. On a separate note both my son Max and I are steam and vintage vehicle enthusiasts and if you are in Nottingham we are often volunteering at Papplewick Pumping Station on Sundays. So come along and introduce yourself. Just look for the steam railway. “
Kerena Marchant
March 4, 2016
My son who is 16 and a Deaf BSL user has been given an unconditional reasonable adjustment offer from 2 colleges to do A Levels in courses appropriate to later doing an architecture degree. These offers exclude English as it is accepted by the colleges that his BSL is at least age appropriate and he will access the course in BSL via interpreter/support worker. Also an appreciation of the barrier that English presents in GCSE. Another college offered him 4 Cs not including English. To achieve this I got a very good Educstional Psychology report from a Deaf Ed psy who explained the issues. The key now is to get reasonable adjustment on the coursework and exams so he can sign the coursework and it be translated.
John Walker (@chereme)
March 4, 2016
In the title of this article, who is ‘they’?
Editor
March 4, 2016
I wrote the title John – the ‘they’ refers to the barriers. Charlie (Ed)
Kerena Marchant
March 4, 2016
The barriers need challenging and we have done this successfully. My 16 year old son is a Desf BSL user with dyslexia. He wants to go to college and eventually university to study architecture. We have fought and as a result he has 2 unconditional reasonable adjustment offers from local colleges to do A Levels. These offers exclude English recognising that he is fluent in BSL and will access the course via and interpreter. We are also seeking reasonable adjustments from the exam boards so he can sign exams and accessments in BSL and have them transcribed into English. We did this by getting an excellent Educstional Psychology report from a Deaf Ed Psy confirming the issues around BSL v English for Deaf and commenting on the appropriateness of the course. 2 colleges have given unconditional offers and another 5 GCSE at C or above excluding English. It can be done. However whilst at college it’s expecte he will continue with English, although I be college was open to this bring dropped and maths if he doesn’t get a C due to requirements at university for architecture.
Jill
March 4, 2016
The root of the problem is still the education of our Deaf children and young people. My own Deaf son attended a deaf school in Derby where the teaching of English was dire and the expectations of the head teacher for her students were appallingly low. It’s not just society’s acceptance of BSL which needs to change it is the education of Deaf children that needs to change too. Too many teachers opt out of the mainstream and step sideways into SEN as it pays more and, unfortunately, is seen as the less stressful option. We need good quality ToDs not the ones who couldn’t cope in mainstream…
pennybsl
March 4, 2016
Adult & Community Education (ACE) is taking a heavy battering thanks to the Government Cuts, ‘its looking-down-at-you attitude’, causing local councils who control ACE to make sweeping cuts.
For instance: Bromley residents and neighbouring borough residents are up in arms, furious and betrayed, by the sweeping actions of Bromley Council slashing off many life-enriching courses which the council regarded as “trivial” and could be transferred to pubic / private services. The complacency of the decision-makers was astonishing.
Families, professionals, colleagues and friends of deaf people using BSL are horrified because this year BSL classes in Bromley Adult Education College are over-subscribed as well as short BSL courses for educational personnel in the borough, very popular.
The anticipated loss of British Sign Language and Deaf employees from the local Adult Education framework, from BAEC’s spacious and safe learning environments, robs people seeking skills, training and employability, robs people who are entitled to concessions, and most of all……… robs the Borough its place in the recent endorsement of a London-wide GLA policy reported by the Limping Chicken yesterday. https://www.bda.org.uk/news/bda-delighted-by-passing-of-british-sign-language-motion-at-city-hall
Tomorrow there’s a major conference defending ACE (and FE) by the Universities and Colleges Union because the UK is facing increasing numbers of people ‘not at work’ – retired, young, old, health issues, carers, etc….. and the Government’s actions, causing panic amongst local authorities, are causing a regressive impact everywhere.
Local councils did not really think of more creative ways including asking us ACE professionals for cost-effective ideas to ensure the continuation of Adult & Lifelong Learning – Deaf people need this always.
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/defending-further-and-adult-education-shaping-the-future-tickets-20057125402
I am sending UCU a report about Deaf Learners and Deaf people in teaching and learning support – many, far too many Deaf ACE and FE professionals have been ejected from their jobs in the past five years.
pennybsl
March 4, 2016
Rob Buxton – thanks for flagging up this GCSE ‘at least C’ English issue; there are many literate Deaf people, even retired Deaf people, available to offer small group / one to one English support across the UK.
The notion of “inclusion” has been tore up in bits by successive Governments who have failed to automatically implement Impact Assessments.
Many young, and older, deaf people are envious of the working conditions 30-60 years ago when deaf people with basic literacy but skilled minds and hands were allowed to climb up the ladder of skills/promotion with one day a week release.
Rob Buxton, your profoundly deaf relative deserves to have a positive CV stating his competence skillset and his communicative ability on the work floor, with a comment ‘In English, he is working towards the required standard’.
He’s very fortunate to have great employers.
We need employers who recognise this obstacle to support us Deaf Education campaigners the need for this requirement to be an option, with the chance to be assessed in regard to work competency – the UK economy needs competent workers!
John Walker (@chereme)
March 4, 2016
Sorry Charlie. Inert things can not be challenged – they have to be a living thing; such as a person or an organisation. If I was really an uninformed person – I could construe that deaf people should be challenged because ‘they’ are the only living thing in the title. I know it may be pedantic but in this day and age, we need to be so careful; ‘they’ leaves the title open to interpretation.
Editor
March 4, 2016
I’ll reword, thanks John!
John
March 4, 2016
Thanks John 🙂 The previous title was misleading as I thought exactly the same thing. A rare slip up by Charlie.
John Walker (@chereme)
March 4, 2016
I agree. Very rare!!
Editor
March 4, 2016
My wife thinks it’s much more often!!
Rob Buxton
March 5, 2016
Hi Pennybsl, I have tried numerous deaf groups and colleges in order to find a bsl users who could teach my son English without success. You would not believe the lengths I’ve gone to in order to try to find someone. So if you know anyone I would love to set up a class here in Nottingham. Regards, Rob Buxton.
Emma
March 10, 2016
There is a Deaf Academy in Walsall College with three Deaf lecturers who are BSL users and they are teaching Deaf students of Functional Skills English and Maths.
Matt Brown
April 15, 2016
“BSL users, who are BSL qualified” – what proportion of Deaf BSL-using students hold BSL qualifications? 10%? 5%? 1%?
I work every week with Deaf post-16 students. If you were a hearing company owner, would you employ an apprentice sparkie who can’t name a fuse, a socket, a cable? Or read those names off a diagram?
The sad fact is that students are allowed on to these courses even *without* the required English and Maths and told that they can attend Level 2 and 3 courses as long as they sit Additional Learning Support classes as well, with the aim of bringing them up to the level 2 (GCSE grade C) standard. I’ve support several Deaf adults through courses like that. In eight years of doing the job, the ALS sessions have never had a successful outcome and the student never passes them, but they get box-ticked through the main course anyway, because the system ensures that throughput is more valuable to the college than rewarding genuine attainment.
All of this is, at any rate, moot. Further Education is being decimated.