Spring Offensive, a self-styled wimpy miserablist band from Oxfordshire, recently released their latest single, ‘Worry Fill My Heart’, with an accompanying music video.
The band perform synchronised signing in the video, and are later joined by a large cast of extras who sign to illustrate the chorus.
To take a look at their efforts, watch the video below. The signing kicks in after 1 minute:
So, where did the idea to include sign language come from?
Matt Cooper, co-songwriter and guitarist with the band, told us he hit upon the idea of including sign language in order to convey the feelings and emotions behind the lyrics in a visual way: “During previous video research, I’d worked with a couple of Deaf actors and was blown away by how much of a visual impact signing brings to the lyrics. Especially for people who have had very little exposure to sign as a language; it becomes this joy to watch even if you can’t understand every word.”
Lead singer Lucas Whitworth added: “When Matt suggested using sign language in the video, the only concern was whether the extras would be able to learn it in time. When you have no experience of signing, it can seem like a daunting task. But, particularly with these lyrics, the signs matched the emotions well and it just seemed to click.”
The band have been keen not to use sign language as a promotional tool. They openly admit that the signing used is not strictly correct BSL, nor is it meant to be. Instead, it is all about the visual impact.
So, without being fluent in sign language, how exactly did the band come up with the lyrics? Matt said: “We asked a good friend of ours, Ben Phillips [NOTE: we have been asked to make clear that this is not Benjamin Phillips, the NRCPD registered interpreter] to help us out. His knowledge of BSL and SSE allowed us to choose the right approach so that the end result would be the best mix possible. He also helped teach the extras, which was invaluable as we only had a very short time!”
Why didn’t the band use Deaf extras? “Lack of money. We didn’t want to ask people who don’t know us to come and help us for free, so we did what we usually do; asked friends and fans. But, importantly, we approached it as a challenge to those people; can you learn and engage with this language? Will you go on and do more having had this experience?”
Matt continued: “We didn’t subtitle the video, or try to translate it into BSL, because we aren’t making any kind of statement about Deaf language or culture. Why would we? It isn’t ours to make a statement about. Instead, we just wanted to use this visually beautiful medium to convey the lyrics, and celebrate the richness of sign.”
By Emily Howlett
Editor’s view, from Charlie Swinbourne
I have to admit that there is something strangely compelling and watchable about seeing the band sign in the video.
One reason for this is the simple fact that they’re not using facial expressions, which we’re so used to seeing signing accompanied by.
That makes the signing seem more robotic and mechanical than usual, almost as though the emotion has been sucked out of it – which is presumably the desired effect for a “miserablist” music band.
The problem is I can’t watch it without laughing. It’s unintentionally hilarious.
It’s a bit like the equivalent of being German and seeing a bunch of English people who don’t know German teaming up to have a crack at speaking German one day, yet with no experience, no emotion or tone, in tandem with one another.
You laugh because while they’re so clearly into it, every single sign isn’t quite right. You know what they’re trying to say, but many signs – or hand movements that are crucial to the sign – are signed in the wrong place.
Such as the sign for “need,” which is supposed to be signed centrally, going down the chest, rather than to the side, as it’s shown here.
And because they look so serious, so earnest as they go… I couldn’t quite stifle my laughter.
Which was slightly embarrassing because I was watching it alone.
So, here’s the question: is this offensive, or art?
I’d defend to the hilt the band’s freedom to express themselves visually, and from what they’ve said, they had great intentions going into it. They also haven’t tried to market it as a ‘BSL video,’ and admit the BSL isn’t quite right. They seem like nice chaps who are genuinely interested in sign language.
My slight problem with it is that this video will play very differently to a deaf and a hearing audience.
Hearing people who don’t know sign language may well think the band are absurdly good at sign language and will probably just think it’s amazing, believing they’re watching a hand and arm based dance routine that has credibility, rather than being a just bunch of random movements.
Meanwhile, people who actually know sign language will be rolling around on the floor with laughter.
In my view, as long as the band are comfortable with making the funniest deaf film since Text Batteries and Earwax, I don’t have a problem.
But what do you think? Leave your comments below.
Spring Offensive start their latest tour on 29th March 2012. To find out more, including gig schedules, click here: http://springoffensive.co.uk/ or check out their Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/springoffensive
Marcy Tanter (@MarcyTanter)
March 26, 2012
Hmm. As a hearing person, I don’t find it offensive as a video but I’m not sure how I’d feel if I were deaf. They aren’t mocking or trying to be offensive, but they’re using their version of sign language because they think it helps to convey a message, but the message isn’t a very nice one. So from that aspect, I find it problematic. At the same time, since they didn’t bother to get the signing right (according to Charlie, who I believe) and didn’t think it was important to get it right, maybe what they’re doing is offensive. If they got the signing right I think I’d look at the video differently, but since I went into it having read the article and comment first, when I watched the video I knew the signing was wrong and that might have affected my perception of the video as a whole.
Ragnar Karlsson
March 26, 2012
@MarcyTanter
BSL, like any language, is far from a monolithic entity; there are variations/dialectal differences. It’s possible – almost certain, even – that the band and their extras were trying to be as accurate as possible. I can’t imagine that the group/extras simply “didn’t bother to get the signing right”, especially since correct signing is open to interpretation. Why would the band even consider slapdash signing? That doesn’t make sense.
While we’re at it, why does it matter whether the message is or “isn’t a very nice one”? If we’re speaking linguistically (and we are), then it’s axiomatic that any language can express any sentiment. Language is a vehicle for communication. As Matt said, “we just wanted to use this visually beautiful medium”. Had the chorus been expressed in, say, French (like Placebo) or even Morse code (like Kraftwerk), would you have reacted to the meaning in the same way?
banjosworld
March 26, 2012
I don’t know if it’s just me, but there’s a “Wes Anderson” vibe to it.
banjosworld
March 26, 2012
I don’t know if it’s just me, but I’m getting a “Wes Anderson” vibe from this music video.
Emily Howlett
March 26, 2012
Well, seeing as I interviewed the guys I should definitely be adding a comment here. Firstly, as noticed by Charlie – they are completely lovely in real life and not remotely robotic or miserable, and would in fact cuddle Deaf people at every opportunity.
I’m not sure I’m actually helping their image there…
Moving on…. I also would defend the idea that artists can use any medium they like to express themselves, as long as they either aren’t offensive or are prepared for the backlash if they choose to wantonly offend people (hello, Tracey Emin). Nothing in this viedo remotely offends me on any level – it’s just artistic endeavour and I do think it works. As Charlie pointed out; the emotionless delivery is not sign language as we use it every day, but it is part of the effect and emotion of the song. Or non-emotion of the song… You know what I mean.
As for whether they researched it properly, I can vouch for their keeness to ‘do it right’. They employed Ben Phillips to try and make a cohesive bridge between what is ‘BSL’, what is ‘SSE’ and what is ‘the song’. So, although they might not have used ACTUAL DEAFS in the video (*weeps*) they have tried to keep us all happy.
Which was silly.
Anyway. I like the hamster best. Next video, Sping Offensive; please include a signing hamster. That really would please everyone.
Smarty
March 26, 2012
I’m deaf and I don’t find this video in the least bit offensive. There is nothing wrong with people being artistically influenced by BSL and the group not trying to take the piss. It’s not as if they are mocking BSL users or making any sort of statement about deaf people.
Lucky
March 27, 2012
Gotta give ’em credit. They’re creative, and doing something that VERY FEW other mainstream bands are doing. Keep it up, guys!
Lucky
richardtongeman
March 27, 2012
i see them using their hands to sign as a similar visual expression of the lyrics as if they had written them down on card plaques or chosen symbols or objects to represent the words. Nice article, thanks.
indieisnotagenre
March 27, 2012
I came across this article because the band posted it on their website earlier today and I’m sincerely grateful that you are pointing this out because it’s something I hadn’t thought about. Personally, the video left quite an impact on me because it actually makes you watch it from start to finish. I love the simplicity of it and it would be a very different experience without the signing language.
I obviously can’t speak as a deaf person but as a native German I found your remark on English people speaking German just for the fun of it amusing (on a side note, English is the popular language to use for German hipsters). However, the band were clearly using signing language for an artistic purpose just like some bands use a bit of German in their songs and it’s not necessarily funny, ridiculous or offensive if it’s placed appropriately.
beninterpreter
March 27, 2012
For the official record – Benjamin (ben) Phillips NRCPD registered
interpreter is not the “Ben Phillips” mentioned in this article.
I have no knowledge, involvement or desire to be associated with this
band and its video displayed here.
It is just chance that the “other Ben Phillips” who helped this band
has the same name as me.
Many thanks to my collegues who brought this to my attention.
Benjamin Phillips
http://www.intobsl.co.uk
Suzanne
October 15, 2012
I am a music teacher who just found out that anyone in the deaf community could be offended by using sign language with hearing children as they sing. I was incorporating the sign language because the signs help to demonstrate the vocabulary of the song. In the sign for “season” we remember that each season holds the earth in its grasp and that the earth revolves around the sun. This is just one example of the deeper meaning of words that is made evident to hearing children through the corresponding sign. When I heard that teaching this to my children was so frowned upon that teachers can actually be “black listed” for teaching ASL signs with songs, I was shocked.
Can someone explain the role of poetry, dance, and vibration in deaf culture.