Jane Cordell, the deaf diplomat who lost an employment tribunal and then an appeal against the Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s decision to withdraw a prestigious posting to Kazakhstan, has given up her career as a result.
The FCO ruled that the cost of providing lipspeaking support (where speech is translated via clear lip patterns so the deaf person can lipread a professional lipspeaker) on that posting was prohibitive – even though Cordell had been previously supported on a posting to Poland.
An article in the Manchester Evening News quotes Cordell as saying:
“I was devastated and shocked. Competition in the FCO is very fierce, especially for foreign postings. This was a key career opportunity in a difficult and interesting posting, which I had won on merit. I wanted to be an ambassador. I knew that I would have been a good one and had been encouraged in that ambition by several other ambassadors. This was a huge career progression for me and I suffered a huge career drop because I was denied that job.”
Cordell, who now works for Action on Hearing Loss also said: “The way I was treated meant I could not have faith in them to be a fair employer nor to offer a work environment in which I could develop and thrive.”
The article also quotes a Foreign and Commonwealth Office spokesman’s response:
“The FCO is fully committed to equality of opportunity and to making reasonable adjustments to allow disabled staff to enjoy the fullest possible FCO career. In this case, we do not believe the adjustments that would have been required – costing in excess of £500,000 over two years – would by any measure be considered reasonable. An employment tribunal agreed with our assessment, though we regret this issue had to come to legal action.”
Rob
March 27, 2012
Disappointing but not surprised. I also had to quit a good job in Civil Service after 20 years…..but I did win my case against HM Government for discrimination and with the above news makes me more determined to expose the failings of Government.
ls
March 27, 2012
How sad, and damaging for many. Where do they get that figure from? Would other compromises have been possible?
The cost is not only for equal opportunity for one person;; it goes far beyond, e.g. to show others, other countries, other people, what society can do to allow access, for inclusion.
ls/ccac/www.ccacaptining.org
Paul
March 27, 2012
The figure quoted by the CEO sounds extreme. Surely there was a way of funding the required support without such extremes. There are some language professionals who are very adventurous and would have loved the opportunity to do a 6-month posting in an amazing setting.
It’s a real shame as the UK could have led the world in the way we support qualified and capable deaf people. Wouldn’t it have been a real mark of British acceptance and equality for other nations to see a deaf diplomat excelling!
Banjo (@banjosworld)
March 27, 2012
Audism keeps rearing its ugly head over and over. She rightfully earned her position, it’s the government who keeps giving her the shaft.
Disgusting.