It’s vital that organisations make their documents and resources accessible to Deaf BSL users, but I’ve never seen anything like this before.
Ofsted’s inspection of adoption support agencies earlier this year included a downloadable document to get the responses of Deaf children and young people.
The document (which ironically, boasts adherence to the Plain English Campaign with the slogan: ‘Committed to clearer communication’) doesn’t offer Deaf children a video of a real, live British Sign Language version of the questions they’re asked to respond to, as you might expect.
Instead it uses ‘BSL symbols’ to get its message across. Take a look…
Producing ‘BSL symbols’ does not equate to making this information accessible in BSL, but Ofsted presumably think it does, because they’ve given the sentences a BSL structure, as seen below:
Images of this type are usually seen in books aimed at learners of BSL , who would spend a while looking at images like this before working out how the sign is supposed to look.
This isn’t a typical way of communicating information to Deaf children and young people and nor should it be. It’d take an age to figure out which sign each image equates to, and therefore to read a document. More importantly, they should be able to understand the questions in their primary language. The actual living, breathing, 3D, physical, visual language that is BSL.
I would love to know who advised Ofsted that this was a way of including Deaf children in the consultation, because the reality here is that they weren’t really included at all.
The worst forms of access are those that seem, on the surface, to offer access, while in reality, they fall a long way short. This falls into that category.
With thanks to @Deaf on Twitter for tweeting this.
By Charlie Swinbourne
The Limping Chicken is supported by Deaf media company Remark!, training and consultancy Deafworks, provider of sign language services Deaf Umbrella, the National Deaf Children’s Society’s Look, Smile Chat campaign, and the National Theatre’s captioned plays.
Johnny
June 11, 2012
RUBBISH ! , they need a live video to give the many expressions and body movement.
Johnny
Lana
June 11, 2012
Hope headmaster/mistress and teachers already explained to OFSTED that they had wasted lots of time on preparing these pictures? The idea of using these pictures obviously came from a stupid hearing person who wasted the taxpayers money!
Michelle Durant
July 2, 2012
I don’t think it waste of money. It came very useful and my daughter became more happier child because she could use those to express how she felts without getting upsetting.
barakta
June 11, 2012
I call this “faux accessibility” and yes it drives me nuts. It happens a lot even with some things from official impairment-specific organisations recommending things which have limited or no decent evidence base behind them.
🙁
Beefo
June 11, 2012
The best person to contact in Ofsted is Anne Duffy, a lead inspector who acts as their main adviser on sensory impairment.
It’s shoddy work, this, but it doesn’t surprise me much. I took Ofsted to arbitration a couple of years ago because the inspector they used to assess my kid’s deaf unit had no expertise in deaf education – she couldn’t understand a word that the kids were signing or saying. It took six months for Ofsted to back down – they are very, very good at stonewalling, not so good at giving deaf kids the right to the same quality of inspection as hearing kids.
Mike Gulliver
June 12, 2012
I’ve written an open letter to Ofsted, you’ll find it at http://mikegulliver.wordpress.com/2012/06/12/an-open-letter-to-ofsted/
Jim Cromwell
June 12, 2012
Use of Widgit commits the same sort of atrocities.
Beefo
June 12, 2012
Mike – you should have told me not to drink whilst reading that, I now have coffee all over my keyboard…. 😉
Concerned Parent
June 13, 2012
Are you aware that the recognition of BSL has led to a lot of deaf children having those “symbols” at school? In schoolwork and homebooks ? Even though its actually closer to Makaton this is the reality of BSL access for a lot of deaf children in the country.
Michelle Durant
July 2, 2012
I have a daughter who is deaf, age and had language delay. And she used those widget and BSL symbols to understanding. I thought it was so brilliant so I’ve bought my own widget and BSL symbols to use communicate with my children. It is great if there wasn’t any other options and it can be use wide audience rather then just aimed to deaf. This is my view and I am in support of the symbols as I think it is fantastic. And this way we will understand of all the information if some can’t read well or had other reason form of disablity. Am deaf myself of 3 children. 2 deaf and 1 hearing and comes from deaf family too. BSL user.