Well, it’s official. The Government thinks that deafness is just a ‘minor’ disability. A piffling little thing of no consequence or cost.
Last week, the Government confirmed the arrangements for the new Personal Independence Payment (PIP) benefit which is replacing Disability Living Allowance (DLA) for disabled people over 16 (DLA is safe for children – for now). In doing so, they confirmed that deaf people will be among those hardest hit. Here’s a National Deaf Children’s Society (NDCS) story on it.
The older lower rate for DLA is out which will hit a lot of deaf people.
And the criteria has been worded in such a word that basically you have to be a sign language user reliant on interpreters all the time to get even basic standard rate of PIP. Some estimates suggest around 90% of deaf people don’t use sign language as their main form of communication in the home.
To add insult to injury, the entire claim process is predicated on the basis that all disabled people can use the phone to request a form. Forget about such quaint things like webforms or email.
From next April over 600,000 disabled people will start to see their DLA cut or removed. That’s over half a million. And yet the announcements got hardly any coverage.
MPs and Lords will have to approve the changes at some point early in the new year. If you’re angry about the fact the Government doesn’t seem to understand deafness or think that it carries any significant extra costs, then get in touch with your MP and ask him or her to oppose the changes. If you get DLA now, explain to your MP what you use it for and what life would be like if you didn’t get it.
And don’t forget, if the Government thinks they can get away with this, deaf children and their families will be next.
First published on Ian Noon’s blog here: http://iannoon.wordpress.com/2012/12/17/welfare-cuts-targeting-deaf-people/
Ian Noon has been profoundly deaf since birth, giving him an interesting perspective “on what needs to change for deaf children and young people in the UK. It also means I have very questionable taste in music.” When he’s not stealing the biscuits in the office, he runs, does yoga and plans his next backpacking holiday. He works for a deaf charity but his views expressed on his blog and here, are his own.
Tali
December 18, 2012
SIgn petitions
https://submissions.epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/34073
Write to your MP.
Tali
December 18, 2012
My MP replied pretty quickly. He said this
“It would be helpful if you could specify exactly where the dwp document states that under the PIP you will cease to receive any benefit.”
Can someone help?
barakta
December 18, 2012
Thanks for this, I will add it to my complaints about the atrocity which is going to be the mobility component and people who have severe mobility difficulties losing those components.
Do you have a link to any information from the govt about where the changes to the criteria for deaf people are?
As for the DWP and obsession with telephones they’re already on my complaints hit-list.
Ian Noon
December 18, 2012
Tali
It’s actually in the regulations – I’ve added some blurb below (written by me) that you can forward to your MP
NDCS will hopefully have a briefing up online soon which will also have this.
Thanks,
Ian
Schedule 2 of the Social Security (Personal Independence Payment) Regulations 2013:
To be awarded PIP at the standard rate, a disabled person needs to ‘score’ 8 points or more under the assessment thresholds.
Under activity 7 – communicating verbally – the following scores are allocated:
• C: Needs communication support to express or understand complex verbal information – scores 4 points
• D: Needs communication support to express of understand basic verbal information – scores 8 points
Case study 9 in the original consultation features a deaf young person who used sign language as his main form of communication. He is considered unable to understand basic information and hence scored 8 points. This suggests to NDCS that other deaf young people who do not rely on sign language (e.g. lipreaders) would not score 8 points and would therefore not be eligible for the standard rate on this basis unless they had some other additional need.
Source: National Deaf Children’s Society
Ian Noon
December 18, 2012
Sorry – Schedule 1 not 2.
Ian Noon
December 18, 2012
Barakta
There’s some general information to the public at:
http://www.dwp.gov.uk/policy/disability/personal-independence-payment/
But the regulations have the detail. In particular, see Schedule 1 of the the regs and then the definitions used earlier on
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2013/9780111532072/contents
I will post a link to the NDCS briefing on this when it is done.
Thanks,
Ian
Kd
December 18, 2012
Are there any other disabled ‘groups’ that are going to be hit hard as well? Or just predominantly deaf people?
Thanks for the blog!
Ian N
December 19, 2012
Not sure. Certainly other disabled groups have been very quiet about these changes…
Ketisfolk
December 18, 2012
I’m already not ‘deaf enough’ for these benefits, despite the obvious difficulties I can have at work and accessing services, particularly when the dreaded telephone is involved. That more people are going to be excluded is really depressing. I’ve now written to my MP on this matter, but she is Labour anyway, so I suspect she’s already against the proposals.
Ketisfolk
December 18, 2012
I’m already not ‘deaf enough’ for these benefits, despite the obvious difficulties I can have at work and accessing services, particularly when the dreaded telephone is involved. That more people are going to be excluded is really depressing. I’ve now written to my MP on this matter, but she is Labour anyway, so I suspect she’s already against the proposals.
Michelle Goodwin
December 18, 2012
This is crazy. Here in Ireland the Disability Allowance ( similar to DLA) is given to anyone with a disability and who are deaf at a rate of 188 euros a week at over the age of 16 and unemployed or in college. It is supposedly means tested but in reality it rarely ever is. So that means anyone with dyslexia or any other minor disability can get it. It makes some deaf people lazy and unmotivated to find employment especially with poor support or awareness in the employment sector. I understand that there are many who would really need it and I’m not disputing this but the benefit fund should be put into a fund that would pave way to Access to Work ( which we don’t have in Ireland) provisions or interpreter funds.
I know this is not revelant to the UK but I’m point out how clueless elected MPs ( or TDs here in Ireland). Many deaf people who are dependent on DA won’t complain or oppose to this.
I wish deaf people in the UK success in protesting against this silly new rules.
John David Walker
December 19, 2012
Ian, what about ‘engaging with other people face to face’ – if this is assessed without access to communication support, wouldn’t this category be something that deaf people can claim against? Especially, if the claimant is a ‘lipreader’.
Ian N
December 19, 2012
Our interpretation is that this is intended more to benefit autistic people – though looking for clarification on this.
Ian N
December 19, 2012
Hi
A briefing on these changes is now online at the NDCS website – you can use this to write to your MP if you would like to
http://www.ndcs.org.uk/document.rm?id=7486
Thanks,
Ian
david1169@yahoo.co.uk
January 16, 2013
Do you have a template letter that we can use to send to our MP?
terrie
November 2, 2013
my niece goes to a school for the deaf, she is 14, she has to board at the school monday through to friday, there are no schools for the deaf in our region so she needs board, they have just stopped her DLA stating she is in a care home (they class her school as a care home because she boards?)and she has a cochlear implant