Sad parliamentary geeks of the world, rejoice! The long-expected Children and Families Bill has now been published, setting out, amongst other, wide-ranging proposals for reform to the special educational needs framework.
This is likely to result in significant changes to how deaf children and their families are supported and educated. If you’re unfamiliar with what the reforms mean, the National Deaf Children’s Society (NDCS) have produced a FAQ for parents of deaf children.
For much of this year, I’m going to be working on the Bill and briefing politicians what it might mean for deaf children and which bits of the Bill they should support, question, clarify or violently throw their Committee chairs against the wall and revolt against. Who knows, I might end up accidentally changing the law again.
In short, it’s going to be a big deal. So before we get into all of that, it’s worth asking a fairly fundamental question: is it sensible to go ahead with these proposals now?
The reason I ask is that the NDCS Stolen Futures campaign has already found that in the two years running up to April 2013, 1 in 3 councils have cut vital services for deaf children. So who is going to be left to implement these reforms?
The reforms are not cost-neutral. That much is clear from the ‘pathfinders’ who have been testing out the reforms. One Teacher of the Deaf working in one of the pathfinder areas told me that the work she had been doing on creating new ‘Education, Health and Care Plans’ involved lengthy meetings with parents and lots of work to co-ordinate with other professionals.
This is not to say that the reforms are a bad idea. But it is to question whether they are sustainable in the long-run, without extra investment. However, the Department for Education have been clear that there is no new money on the table.
The big fear is that this reform actually causes so much upheaval that services get worse and deaf children’s education suffers.
Parents of deaf children are already a little anxious about what this all means. In a NDCS survey, just 6% of parents of deaf children thought the proposals would mean that deaf children would get better support. 80% of parents who were familiar the reforms said they thought the real aim was to reduce spending. The Department clearly has some work to do to reassure parents.
As the Bill goes through Parliament, NDCS is going to be reinforcing this point: that unless the Department for Education ‘step up’ and intervene where local authorities are making cuts to services, their SEN reforms risk making a bad situation worse.
Ian Noon has been profoundly deaf since birth, giving him an interesting perspective “on what needs to change for deaf children and young people in the UK. It also means I have very questionable taste in music.” When he’s not stealing the biscuits in the office, he runs, does yoga and plans his next backpacking holiday. He works for a deaf charity but his views expressed on his blog and here, are his own. Follow him on Twitter as @IanNoon
The Limping Chicken is the UK’s independent deaf news and deaf blogs website! Check out our supporters:
- Remark! – Deaf media company producing television programmes, video BSL translation, multimedia solutions, plus providing training and interpreters
- Deaf Umbrella – Sign language communications provider, including BSL interpreters
- SignVideo – Provider of online BSL video interpreting services
- STAGETEXT – Charity providing theatre captioning – giving you every word of a play
- RAD Deaf Law Centre – Providing legal advice for Deaf people – in BSL
- Bee Communications – Remote Captioning – providing text-based access wherever you are
Andy
February 21, 2013
The question is…. why do we need these cuts at all?
The Conservative election policy was to reduce taxes and make people better off. But it hasn’t happened, has it? Instead of reducing taxes they have instead reduced services, on the assumption that fewer services equals less expenditure.
What in fact they are doing is moving the problems elsewhere. We will now have to solve the problem that deaf children are not being appropriately educated. Not given a fair start in life. Not allowed to take an equal place in society in the future because their education isn’t up to scratch. A familiar and well trodden path. One might be forgiven for reacting with “Oh no! Not again!”.
I would point out that there is a simple and practical alternative to this. Increase taxes. I’m sure that everyone is familiar with the concept that you get what you pay for. The idea that the prices of everything are increasing is also a familiar one. Any fool can understand that you can’t cut costs while prices are constantly rising! Yet this government appear to have wangled their way into power, not by being elected but on some vague promise of saving us money. How???
WHY is it necessary to cut services in this punitive and inhumane way? WHY can’t the government say, “Well look folks, if you want these services you have to pay for them”. But instead they go steaming ahead trying to do the impossible.
Maggie Thatcher did exactly the same. ” I am going to sort this country’s finances out!” she thundered. And she did. But then got carried away and went too far.
This unelected government of rich toffs have not even got that far and I don’t think they can. I can’t wait to get rid of the buggers at the next election, or hopefully sooner.