The Department for Work and Pensions’ have succeeded in their plans to replace Disability Living Allowance with a new benefit called Personal Independence Payment (PIP) for disabled people over 16. The regulations were debated and voted through by Parliament around a month ago. And now many deaf people will lose out.
A response from the National Deaf Children’s Society is online and sets out their anger and disappointment.
I think what makes me most angry is the way the Government have gone about making this cut without being open about the consequences. Lots of members of the public and a few MPs and peers have raised concerns about the impact of these changes on deaf people. They have all been largely fobbed by the Department for Work and Pensions in several different insidious ways.
For example, the Department have been prone to engage in rhetoric about supporting those “most in need” when asked how deaf people will be affected.
Note the implication that that deafness isn’t that big a deal. If the Department think this, they should come out and say so. They’ve had ample opportunity.
And since when did it become OK for the Department for Work and Pensions to turn disability into some kind of big competition, pitting different groups of disabled people against each other to see who is ‘most’ disabled? I thought the just thing to do was to support everyone who needs help. It’s brazen and shameless divide and rule.
Another example of how the Department have batted away concerns is through refusing to identify how many deaf people will lose out. They say the Department can’t monitor the impact on deaf people. Everyone’s needs need to be looked at individually, they say. I find this curious because the Department can come up with a very specific figure of 608,000 people who will be affected by these changes. That’s 608,000 individuals who have already been judged to not be disabled enough. They can also breakdown figures in terms of who is on different rates of DLA. I rather suspect the Department can work out the differential impact but have made a conscious decision not to do so.
And finally, and probably what annoys me most, is some rather disingenuous use of definitions. For example, the dividing line between those deaf people who will and won’t get PIP is whether they have difficulties understanding basic or complex verbal information without communication support. So if you can’t understand basic information, you qualify. If you can understand basic but not complex you won’t.
When someone says ‘complex’ information, I assume they’re talking about the philosophy of Nietzsche or the budget for the European Commission. In fact, ‘complex’ anything that takes more than a sentence. This isn’t complex information at all – it’s everyday communication. And now deaf people who can understand yes or no but who struggle with everyday communication will lose out. So much for promoting personal independence.
The changes come into force from April. Reassessments for anyone who is currently claiming DLA will start from October – including deaf children who have just turned 16. You can expect a letter in the post. If you currently have a lifetime award, this isn’t going to make a difference, you will still undergo reassessment. In most cases, you will probably be called to a face to face assessment.
It now seems likely that the Department for Work and Pensions will turn their attention to DLA for children. Will the Department attempt to cut support to those children it deems to not disabled enough? If so, they’re going to have a hell of a fight on their hands.
Ian Noon has been profoundly deaf since birth, giving him an interesting perspective “on what needs to change for deaf children and young people in the UK. It also means I have very questionable taste in music.” When he’s not stealing the biscuits in the office, he runs, does yoga and plans his next backpacking holiday. He works for a deaf charity but his views expressed on his blog and here, are his own. Follow him on Twitter as @IanNoon
The Limping Chicken is the UK’s independent deaf news and deaf blogs website! Check out our supporters:
- Remark! – Deaf media company producing television programmes, video BSL translation, multimedia solutions, plus providing training and interpreters
- Deaf Umbrella – Sign language communications provider, including BSL interpreters
- SignVideo – Provider of online BSL video interpreting services
- STAGETEXT – Charity providing theatre captioning – giving you every word of a play
- RAD Deaf Law Centre – Providing legal advice for Deaf people – in BSL
- Bee Communications – Remote Captioning – providing text-based access wherever you are
- Krazy Kat – live visual theatre combining mime, dance, song, puppets and sign language
- The University of Wolverhampton’s Deaf Learner Open Day – on Wednesday 27th March!
John David Walker
March 7, 2013
Nice points here, but it should be stated that those on lifetime awards will not be called in for reassessment until 2015. The test now will be for people on temporary awards and people applying for PIP, such as 16 year olds. It is here where the real test will be for the next two years.
Julie Johnston
March 7, 2013
I have a son with severe learning disabilities. I was once told – by a parent at the school he went to , that it was alright for me – my son didn’t “look” disabled compared to her |Downs Syndrome daughter!!! Actually – this girl was more able to do things than my son!
So it’s divide and conquer even form within.
Mark
March 7, 2013
Yes, but where were the big “Deaf” organisations when all this was being debated? Hiding under a rock…
deaf2work
March 7, 2013
NDCS, BDA and AoHL have responded in consultation phase but it’s the government who is not listening.
Mark
March 7, 2013
What I mean is, they weren’t campaigning visibly against the changes to DLA/PIP, ie, on Twitter, in the news, etc. The Govt weren’t listening because these organisations weren’t really doing their job…
Tali
March 7, 2013
If we demand an interpreter for every single assessment appointment we have with PIP e.g. lipspeaker or a BSL signer and only communicate via the interpreter at our assessments – how can they determine if we can understand basic communication???
What a shambolic design of a system!
e mannion
March 12, 2015
My daughter is proundly deaf and cochlear implanted and has been refused pip for all of the statements thst you argue against because she doesnt have a learning disability and could ask for directions or read a map, i think its disgusting my daughter has been through so much and struggles in different situations to understand what is being said but some pen pusher who spoke to her for 2o mins affects the rest of her life, me and her dad work full time don,t claim and abuse systems what can u do the battle is lost, how can she become more independant when she is now fully dependant on us she is 17 and in college.