One of perhaps the nicest things about being a student on a Health Course only campus is the universities ‘In their shoes day.’
The basic idea is that every student should have the opportunity to experience life from the point of view of the client/patient/service user they are working with and therefore, hopefully, have some empathy with their situation. The university hopes that this experience will encourage students to become deaf aware, wheelchair friendly or just plain aware of what it might be like to live day in, day out, with a disability.
A few months ago I had the opportunity as part of my Social Work Skills module to spend the afternoon in a wheelchair pootling around the university while knocking into people and objects, as well as shouting at the Student Union shop staff when I discovered they’d blocked all the aisles, making them inaccessible to wheelchair uses.
Hats off to the university, other than the shop I couldn’t find a single inaccessible place – even the library aisles were wide enough for me to wheel myself along, although reaching up for books was an almighty pain. I discovered lots of things about myself through the exercise, including the fact that I’m probably the most fiercely independent person in my lecture group – I outright refused to be pushed around in my wheelchair and instead wheeled myself everywhere, though the only place this was difficult was getting in and out of the lift!
I also had a good chuckle with my friends when my university lecturer told me that I couldn’t use the blindfold and thus be “deaf-blind” as the university hadn’t risk assessed for this. Although this was funny in a way, it also irked me as many of my friends are deaf-blind, or are becoming deaf-blind through Ushers Syndrome, and I felt this was something I really wanted to experience in a simulation context – fully aware that this would not be the exact day-to-day experience of my deaf-blind friends.
Today it is the turn of my nursing student friends to “step in their shoes” and become deaf, blind, on crutches or a wheelchair user.
I met up with them on my way to an appointment and was amused to see that every one of them had chosen to become “deaf” for the day. I suspect a lot of cheating will take place, but it was funny to see them struggle to hear in the group setting and to see their frustration at the things I so often feel frustrated by. I expect that the experience they’ve had is similar to the day to day experiences I have with my hearing aids in, as they all said they could hear a little but not fully, and that speech was extremely muffled and unclear.
I remember a while back there was a whole stream of media coverage surrounding journalists and reporters who all decided to become ‘deaf for the day’ and experience what life is like as a deaf person. The Limping Chicken’s own Charlie Swinbourne reported on one of these attempts and wrote extensively on how these experiences of deafness could never match up to the real deal; and on one level I believe he’s right.
My friends’ experiences of “deafness” are exaggerated by their inability to communicate, so becoming “deaf” for a few hours will not allow them to learn to lip-read, to sign (better than they already can) or to fully adjust and develop the coping mechanisms deaf people learn throughout their lives.
The simulation resembles, if anything, the frustrations that must be felt by older people with age-related deafness or by those who become deaf suddenly as a consequence of illnesses such as meningitis. However, at the end of the exercise my friends can take out the ear-plugs and go back to being their “normal, hearing selves,” choosing to either learn from the experience or, in some cases, more likely forget.
Yet there is a part of me that hopes that they have learnt from the exercise; certainly from their comments so far I can safely say they’ll never take lip-reading for granted ever again. And I hope that in some way it will build on the deaf awareness skills they already have, and that they will be more mindful of the trials of group conversations and how background noise can further add to the frustration.
It may be wishful thinking but I’m glad that my university is at least attempting to ensure that future generations of nurses, occupational therapist, speech and language therapists and social workers have at least some idea of what it means to be deaf – and will therefore have hopefully developed a degree of awareness and sensitivity towards the issue.
Ni Gallant is a Contributing Editor for the Limping Chicken and a deaf teen who has just started university. This year she was on the NDCS Youth Advisory Board and she also runs a Youth Group for Worcestershire deaf teens called “Deafinity.” She writes a blog (www.nigallant.blogspot.com) about life from a deaf teenagers perspective and says that “somehow what I said resonates with other young people – so I carried on!”
The Limping Chicken’s supporters provide: BSL translation, multimedia solutions, television production and BSL training (Remark! ), sign language interpreting and communications support (Deaf Umbrella), online BSL video interpreting (SignVideo), theatre captioning (STAGETEXT), legal advice for Deaf people (RAD Deaf Law Centre), Remote Captioning (Bee Communications), visual theatre with BSL (Krazy Kat) , healthcare support for Deaf people (SignHealth), specialist lipspeaking support (Lipspeaker UK), sign language and Red Dot online video interpreting (Action Deafness Communications) education for Deaf children (Hamilton Lodge School in Brighton), and a conference on deafness and autism/learning difficulties on June 13th in Manchester (St George Healthcare group).
Andy not Mr Palmer but another one
April 24, 2013
The BIG difference between these deaf simulations and the harsh reality is that hearing people can still hear their own voice.
The other thing is that of course they don’t experience things like discrimination and prejudice. You would have to test them for months to get that. I suspect that the minute things went wrong the earplugs would come out.
At the end of the test they go back to being hearing and they know that so they can assume an air of tolerance for the duration. For us there is no escape.
Kath Luxton
April 24, 2013
hi there Ni. Great post, simply expressed and very upbeat. Would be great to put it in the hospital papers. The Comms department would be really interested in this I am sure. 🙂
Hearing Link
April 24, 2013
At a Hearing Link Intensive Rehabilitation Programme (for those with acquired profound hearing loss and their families) the family member or friend who attends spends a morning trying to communicate and lipread wihilst simulating hearing loss.
Although no one can ever fully understand hearing loss without experiencing it themselves, we have found that this can be a real turning point in the understanding of husbands, wives, sisters, friends. For some this changes their behaviour forever.
One of the particpants talks about this (from 3:40) during this subtitled video diary filmed at an Intensive Rehab Programme. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkEiYxfG0qo
Liza
April 24, 2013
I think it’s like anything. You really can’t experience what it’s really like to be deaf, blind, disabled, elderly etc if you’re not. In the same way that someone who is profoundly Deaf from birth really can’t understand what it’s really like to be hearing. For those who really want to try to understand it is at least a start and you’d hope that as medical professionals of the future a little bit of that would linger, challenge stereotypes and improve their practice
Robert Mandara
April 25, 2013
This is a great idea which should be extended beyond the boundaries of the university setting. Nevertheless, there are some obvious problems:
1) How are people simulating deafness? Earplugs alone can’t simulate a profound hearing loss, not least because they don’t replicate the typical non-linear spectrum.
2) Do the earplugs look like hearing aids? Much of the discrimination we face is due to the fact that people can see that we’re deaf before even meeting us.
3) After your tooth has been filled, you quickly forget how bad the toothache was to start with. This kind of simulation needs to be refreshed periodically so that people don’t forget.
4) The people taking part in this experiment were doing so on a relatively relaxed day and in an understanding environment. The challenges would be much greater if the subjects were going to job interviews, do their exams or putting themselves in other situations where the people with the relevant disabilities experience the greatest difficulties.
5) One day is not long enough. Besides, the subjects know from the start that the disability is only temporary which surely affects their attitudes.