In an uncertain world, there’s one person you can turn to for dependable advice: the limping chicken. Offering sensible tips for all kinds of common deaf-related problems. Here’s the latest instalment of our ‘agony chicken’ column…
Our reader, A, writes:
If you’re not completely deaf, what is the term you should use?
Personally, I just say I’m ‘deaf’ to those I’m likely never going to see again, but with close friends and family I explain the whole story.
I just don’t want to offend those who are more deaf than me; I have a moderate – severe loss and wear hearing aids and a radio aid at my school.
I’ve been known as being deaf since the age of 7, although I’ve been deaf since birth (we think) – I lipread before that, and still do today, however I don’t sign (although I would like to learn in the future).
Can I say I am ‘deaf,’ or should I explain the whole story in every required context? As I’m sure you guys know, the story is never short or simple.
The Chicken replies:
Hi A, thanks for your friendly email, which helped me wake up from my post-Christmas hangover (this chicken partied a little too hard, and ate a bit too much chicken feed in its coop).
Well, this topic is one that causes much debate.
The short answer is this: the term you use to describe yourself should be the one you’re most comfortable with.
That said, there are some terms that can cause offence to people in the Deaf community.
Saying you’re ‘deaf and dumb’ wouldn’t be desirable at all, obviously, but many people don’t realise that the term ‘hearing impaired’ is now widely seen as being offensive by many (but not all) deaf people, because of its negative connotations (read Mark Levin’s article for more on this).
The best approach, in my view, is to continue to vary the terms you use, depending on who you’re talking to, and how people respond to those terms, while also finding ways of keeping things short and simple.
It’s true that calling yourself ‘deaf’ when you’re not profoundly deaf (nor a sign language user) can cause eyebrows to be raised in the Deaf community, but often this term works well with non-deaf people, so if you’re happy to, then use it.
But, if you want to indicate more precisely that you use some of your hearing, then the solution could be to describe yourself as being ‘partially deaf’ or even ‘partially hearing.’ (You could also go for ‘hard of hearing,’ which isn’t seen as negatively as ‘hearing impaired’)
The key, in this chicken’s view at least, is to use terms that people can understand quickly, in order to be able to move on with the conversation.
My own preference, having exactly the same level of deafness as you, is to use ‘partially deaf,’ or even the more casual ‘I’m a bit deaf,’ for more relaxed social situations.
Since communication is the key, it may also be worth tailoring your description in order to help people realise how they can help you understand them.
For example, you may wish to say: “I’m partially deaf and I lipread, so would it be ok for you to look at me when you’re talking to me?”
There are no easy answers to your question, but I hope this helps. Many of us Deafies spend a lifetime finding out what works (and what we say often changes as time passes) so don’t be afraid of trying different terms out to see what works for you.
Do you agree with the chicken’s advice? Tell us what YOU would do below!
Please send your problems for consideration to: thelimpingchicken@gmail.com
Andy. Not him, me.
January 6, 2014
One possible reply could be that Deaf people should be more tolerant. It is highly manipulative when people go around being “offended” all the time. The implication is that it is wrong and evil to offend them and therefore we should all watch our behaviour.
But just a minute… I’m highly offended by manipulative behaviour. As far as I am concerned people who manipulate are the lowest of the low. They can’t win any other way so they resort to Political Correctness and manipulative behavior. This lacks integrity. It doesn’t do the Deaf world, or them any favours.
The result is that we get people who don’t dare to say anything in case they spark off another bout of foot stamping from those with a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Its the tail wagging the dog. Again.
jamesJames
January 6, 2014
Unless you have control over everyone else’s feelings, that’s not really a solution to anything. Being considerate of others sometimes involves compromise in the way you behave, nothing wrong with that.
Some people also don’t find racism or sexism offensive and consider it a burden to have to ‘pander’ to ‘them’ all the time. Where do you draw your line, exactly?
Andy. Not him, me.
January 7, 2014
I draw the line exactly at one point. That point is that people should not >bully< others around to their point of view, no matter how passionate their personal beliefs.
If they can't convince them by rational debate then maybe the ideas themselves have no merit. I draw the line at NOT forcing a point of view on to others, on forums, in the Press and in community life.
I also draw the line at NOT throwing people out of groups because they don't go along with the majority clique, NOT blackening people's name because they have an independent opinion, NOT publicly bullying dissenters, NOT suppressing opposing opinions in a manner typical of totalitarian regimes all over the world.
I don't think that's unreasonable, do you?
Tony Sutton
January 6, 2014
If you’re wearing hearing aids, you’re deaf. Without it, you cannot hear so you’re deaf. Simpe like that.
Natalya Dell
January 6, 2014
Nice reply.
I have been glad to see a bit less of the divisive Big D and little d deaf stuff in UK deaf circles as how deaf we are on a chart doesn’t always impact what communication methods we have been able to access either from our family or education system or by choice later in life.
I am lucky the signing deaf community have always been welcoming to me as individuals despite my limited sign and hand-impairments even if as a group it could feel like I’d never be good enough – especially watching flames about who was Deaf Enough on the now defunctish Deaf-UK Y! group. I’ve since realised is that many signing deaf people feel just as insecure about whether they’re Big enough D enough as I do about being neither deaf or hearing but somewhere in between. I don’t know many people who feel confident describing themselves as Big D – most people have some level of “but…” in that identity. I think bi-cultural deaf identities are much more useful and recognition that our definitions and identities (and explanations) may change depending on where we are at a time.
I applaud this nuance in the deaf communities and think LC here is a good part of that in the last however long you’ve been running.
Rob
January 6, 2014
I agree with this comment above. It is high time that we stop “fighting amongst ourselves” for the right words to describe our variety of deafness and just accept a generic term. We have far more important battles to fight for equality and fairness in our society and the Deaf being the invisible disability is often the last to be considered by all sections of Society and often let down by Government Policies. So get over it and concentrate on the really important issues.
Kerry
January 6, 2014
My 4 year old wears hearing aids and has a moderate loss from birth. Her speech is clear but she struggle in busy, crowded or noisy environments. People just do not get that she has a ‘hearing impairment’ and dismiss her for stubborn.
I say to people she has a moderate loss, can hear quite a bit but uses body language and lip patterns to help. That’s it. If they are worth knowing or genuinely interest then I explain in more detail.
Do whatever you feel is best. Do not be afraid to describe yourself however best you can. After all only you know yourself 100% and as your confidence grows your deaf, hard of hearing, hearing impaired or partially hearing descriptions, whichever you choose, will be said with pride my lovely!
TobyG
January 6, 2014
Kerry, I’m the same as your daughter but with a total loss in one ear (Hellooo right side). I have found growing up as a young adult, that noisy environments are actually the best in which to socialize sometimes.. as the noise and music brings everyone down to my level, shouting, eye contact, paraphrasing.
Of course, being a lip reader and suffering with sensitive remains of my good ear (I wear a plug in clubs, or have my aid capped at 100db) I stop people leaning in and yelling and just say…”look at me, and speak normally”..then I get to yell at them.
bliss..
Graham
January 6, 2014
I agree with all the comments above, in that you call yourself whatever you are comfortable with. Just to add my two pence to the mix, I am profoundly deaf, with total deafness at the higher frequencies; even with very powerful hearing aids, I still have a significant hearing loss. So I am very definitely deaf, but I do not sign. So when someone says that I am not truly deaf because I don’t sign – it seems very strange to me; especially when that deaf person actually has better hearing than me!
Also, I find it a bit irksome to be called hard-of-hearing; mainly because I feel it undermines and makes light of the difficulties that I have. But as some of the comments say, that is my issue and it is not for me to stomp around acting all offended.
sueby
January 6, 2014
I use the term hearing impaired and can’t for the life of me understand why it’s seen as negative!
JK
January 6, 2014
My 100% guaranteed foolproof words to describe your degree of deafness to other people – strangers, relatives etc: (a) a wee bit (b) slightly (c) quite (d) pretty much (e) completely deaf.
L
January 6, 2014
Hi Chicken, I appreciate this post and think you did a great job in differentiating the terms. I’d like to add my advice.
When advocating for equal opportunity to access education, entertainment, employment, and all the things that life has to offer for a group of people, it helps to use one term so that all people in the category/group are represented. This is why I refer to myself as deaf. (lowercase d).
I would tell the writer of the question: let us not worry about offending each other due our severity of hearing loss. Let us support each other in ensuring we all feel included by our communities and society.
My hearing loss fluctuates so qualifying words like “pretty much” or “quite” muddy the water of my message about what I need from others and in the my community and workplace in order to be successful. I’m curious what other people who experience this think. I also choose deaf because it is a term that is familiar to the general population and I think it helps imply the severity and challenging nature of the condition. If I’m going to help eliminate incorrect stereotypes, I need to have a word that represents us.
Among many misconceptions about people with hearing loss, a big one is the viewpoints of individuals who identify as Deaf with a capital letter D. This refers to Deaf culture and therefore, very different from those of us who do not identify with the culture also known as American Deaf Culture, well defined and detailed by Gallaudet University at http://bit.ly/1efCMLn.
Lucy
January 6, 2014
I find this question very difficult personally. I have a fairly significant partial one-sided hearing loss, and while I function ok around hearing people I rarely forget that I have trouble hearing. I grew up calling myself ‘partially deaf’ but never encouraged/allowed to think of that as part of my identity – it was just a practical description. As an adult, as I recognised the impact it’s had on my life, I started to let myself consider that I was some variety of deaf, in relation to hearing people. I finally got a hearing aid aged 18. I’m learning BSL.
But on the occasions I find myself in company with people much deafer than me, I’m often considered not-deaf, or labelled ‘hard of hearing’ (a term I dislike and never use for myself unless forced to). I feel stuck between two extremes – not hearing enough for the hearing folks but not deaf enough for the deaf people either.
Am I not allowed to have a ‘deaf identity’, if I can hear at all? Who makes the rules? Where can I belong? Whose toes am I supposed to avoid treading on? Am I being tremendously insensitive? It’s very hard.
David
January 7, 2014
Like Lucy, I had a sudden hearing loss leaving me with unilateral hearing- hard of hearing is my usual go to label (I DO find it hard to hear!) but I don’t see why I can’t say I am “deaf”- compared to how I was prior to the loss I sure as hell FEEL deaf. I’ll label myself how I choose, and if people want to split hairs and worry about nomenclature defining who I am, then knock yourself out.
“Who makes the rules” as Lucy says, it kind of smacks of “deafer than thou”… kind of ridiculous to get stuck in the semantics when there are so many serious issues facing people with a hearing loss
Exeter Deaf Academy
January 14, 2014
Read a good article on this “The “D” Word: Deaf Discrimination Towards Deaf” http://xpressivehandz.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/the-d-word-deaf-discrimination-toward.html