We all know that wrestling’s fake, the American WWE form of it at least, but it’s been revealed that any controversy over whether it’s really a sport or not could have been overshadowed by the introduction of a deaf wrestler, played by a hearing man, who confusingly, would also have recited poetry.
An article from WrestlingInc.com has been revealed that Adam Copeland, the man who later became superstar wrestler Edge (below), had to fight off plans to write him as a ‘deaf-mute’ (which incidently, is an offensive way of referring to a profoundly deaf person) earlier in his career.
Copeland, who was then a wrestling unknown, told a podcast that the plan was proposed because the bosses didn’t think he could talk well enough. Which also begs the question of how he’d have delivered his poetry – would he have signed?
Extract from the article:
After some disagreements with Russo in terms of the direction of his character, Copeland said plans were being put in place to make him a “deaf mute.” He was scheduled to work as a Jim Morrison-like character, reciting poetry and “wearing chains and stuff.”
“Russo wanted to write me as a deaf mute because he didn’t think I could talk,” he said. “It was his idea, so obviously he didn’t think I liked his idea and thought I’d screw with this kid. (The idea would have made me) dead in the water.”
We can only speculate what might have happened if the plan had gone ahead.
Would Deaf fans have been impressed at the idea of a hearing man pretending to be deaf? Would Copeland have managed to avoid reacting to sound for the duration of his career? How quickly would he have learned ASL?
And how long would his career have lasted? Actually, maybe we don’t need to speculate on that one – not long.
The article also reveals how at one point, Copeland was also being set up to play one half of a Midnight Express-style tag-team partnership.
Which is all, in conclusion, very bizarre.
Read more at http://www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/2014/0104/568917/edge-reveals-terrible-gimmick-wwe-proposed/#od8WqbFf1a0wMwD5.99
Check out what our supporters provide:
- Phonak: innovative technology and products in hearing acoustics.
- Bellman: hearing loss solutions
- Ai-Live: Live captions and transcripts.
- Deaf Umbrella: sign language interpreting and communications support.
- 121 Captions: captioning and speech-to-text services.
- Signworld: online BSL learning and teaching materials.
- STAGETEXT: theatre captioning.
- Krazy Kat: visual theatre with BSL.
- SignHealth: healthcare support for Deaf people.
- Deafinitely Theatre: theatre from a Deaf perspective.
- Lipspeaker UK: specialist lipspeaking support.
- SDHH: Deaf television programmes online.
- Sign Solutions:, language and learning.
- Lexicon Signstream: BSL interpreting and communication services.
- Action Deafness Communications: sign language and Red Dot online video interpreting.
- Hamilton Lodge School in Brighton: education for Deaf children.
- RAD Deaf Law Centre: legal advice for Deaf people.
sammmymack
January 6, 2014
There is a very successful Deaf wrestler in the USA called Matt Hamill. i wonder how he and his fans would felt if he’s had to fight him. Out of interest, he relies on colour coded flags so his cornerman can tell him instructions mid-fight and refs have to tap him when the round is over. There was a film made about his early life and controversy about the casting of a hearing actor who is fluent in asl like Hammil to play him. The hearing actor stood down and a deaf actor was cast.
Andy not Mr Palmer but another one
January 7, 2014
Just in the interests of accuracy… It is not possible to assume that deaf-mute applies only to deaf people as you have said.
“Mute” means “cannot speak” or “has no voice” as in the mute swan, which makes no sound.
People who have been deafened by Rubella in infancy frequently have a damaged larynx as well. They either don’t have a voice or can only manage a sound. They can accurately be described as deaf-mute and many of them prefer not to use speech, they sign.
The “deaf and dumb” thing rumbles on and on but in fact it is caused by a language difference. In this country the Queens English uses the word dumb to mean “without speech”. However in US English “dumb” means stupid. Not the same thing at all and a pretty deadly insult into the bargain. It’s not surprising if Americans get angry at being called dumb!
So this is in fact a Transatlantic thing that has crept across the pond. Calling people “dumb” for stupid and “mad” for angry are Americanisms which we do not need to adopt if we do not wish to. There is really no need to steam into battle every time someone uses the wrong language.
Hood, trunk, fender, muffler, gas. All Americanisms that we do not use in relation to automobiles, or cars. Why get excited over “dumb”?