From the BDA website:
After the Mandela sign language fiasco, the British Deaf Association has launched a government e-petition to give deaf people the legal right to support from qualified, registered communication professionals.
David Buxton, Chief Executive of the British Deaf Association, said: “The story of the fake sign language interpreter at Nelson Mandela’s Memorial struck a chord with deaf people the world over.
“It is good that the South African authorities tried to make the event accessible to deaf audiences. But the fact that they hired an interpreter who wasn’t up to the job is depressingly familiar.
“Here in the UK, there are too many unqualified interpreters providing a sub-standard service to deaf children and adults. This is damaging deaf people’s wellbeing, education and employment chances.
“In their daily lives, deaf adults and children depend on good communication support from qualified, registered BSL/English interpreters and other communication professionals. Ensuring deaf people are included in all walks of life saves taxpayers’ money by avoiding misdiagnosed illnesses, reducing unemployment, lessening demand on services and by ensuring their ability to contribute to the workplace and the wider community
“The solution is surprisingly straightforward. Nationally and locally, the government should commit to using only registered communications professionals.
“That means only using sign language interpreters, speech to text reporters, lipspeakers and other communication professionals who are appropriately qualified and also registered with a national regulatory body able to issue sanctions.
“I am delighted that the Ministry of Justice has already pledged to do this. It is time for the rest of government to follow its example.
“We are asking everyone to sign our e-petition at http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/58405 (see BSL video) urging the government to require all public bodies by law to provide a deaf person with a registered communication professional should they require it. If we get 10,000 signatures, the government has to respond formally. If we get 100,000 signatures, we can get a debate in the House of Commons about this.
“Please sign the e-petition to get deaf people the decent communication support they need.”
Read the article at: http://www.bda.org.uk/News/144
Patricia Hagger
January 7, 2014
I fully support this petition and trust and hope that good sense will prevail.
Matt Brown
January 8, 2014
I notice that the petition calls for young people and schools to only use qualified registered professionals.
According to CRIDE there are about 3,000 children who use sign language as a primary means of communication in schools. This only counts kids in compulsory (primary and secondary) education, we don’t really know how many Deaf teens are in Further Education.
Meanwhile we have about 1,000 fully qualified interpreters plus registered trainees.
So if we put every single CSW in the country on the dole, then deprived every single Deaf adult in the country from having any access qualified interpreters, and then somehow forced every single interpreter to work only in schools, we’d be able to support about one third of the kids.
Don’t think the BDA have really thought this one through.
There were attempts last year to improve the registration and supervision of CSWs and get them registered, but those attempts to improve and regulate the profession were opposed by the likes of ASLI, Purely out of self-interest, in my opinion.
John David Walker
January 8, 2014
I didn’t realise Government would take a 100 word text on e-petition and use it word for word in a new law – I would normally expect a period of consultation and engagement to create a law. What about providing an investment to the 3000 CSWs who are working on the cheap, and provide them with a qualification, registration and CPD that gives them professional credibility? Such a law would be useful.
Matt Brown
January 8, 2014
Sorry for assuming that the wording of a petition to government should actually be taken at face value.