I have a few recent conversations I’d like to share with you. The first, as follows, was between myself and a hearing man I know only vaguely;
Hearing Dude: “What’s your son doing?”
Me: “Oh, he’s suddenly started signing loads of things; he’s just picking them up without us noticing, really.”
Hearing Dude: “So, does he speak?”
Me: “Well… A bit?”
Hearing Dude: “Signing is delaying his speech then?”
Me: “Um.”
The second was with a deaf friend of mine, over text messaging,
Me: “We are at the zoo! He’s singing ‘cow’ at the meerkats!
Buddy Pal: “Singing?”
Me: “DAMN YOU AUTOCORRECT.”
Buddy Pal: “It’s super cute either way. Teach him to ask daddy for a lemur.”
Me: “I don’t know the sign for lemur.”
Buddy Pal: “Your boy does. I taught him last week.”
Me: “Um.”
Another went like this;
Random Excitable Mother (Hearing): “He’s signing!! Look at him signing! That’s so clever; he’s doing Twinkle Twinkle Little Star! What is that sign he’s doing now?”
Me: “He’s picking his nose. Um?”
Shall we go for a different one? Oh, wait, it’s not so different after all;
Me: “He never says ‘Mum’ to me; he uses the sign, though he says ‘Daddy’ and ‘Grandma’.”
Person I Quite Liked Up Until This Moment: “You’re saying he can’t say ‘Mummy’?”
Me: “I’m not saying he can’t say ‘Mummy’, I’m saying he knows not to say ‘Mummy’ because Mummy won’t hear him saying it. I say.”
Person I Am Rapidly Beginning To Actively Dislike: “I’ve been listening to him and I don’t think he can speak well at all. He just yells a lot and waves his arms about.”
Me: “Um.”
And finally, shortly after that last conversation, I had a meeting with a deaf male friend I don’t see very often;
He: “How’s your little man’s signing?”
Me: “Brilliant! He can do but one of my friends said it has delayed his speech. Sadness.”
He: “What ?! And when they said that, which kill method did you use?”
Wildly different views there. And, to be honest, I have found myself changing the way I present the fact that my little boy will sign to you. If you are hearing, I tend to play it down a bit; “Oh, yes he signs sometime, but don’t worry, he’s hearing!” Which makes me more than a little disappointed in myself.
However, if you are deaf, like my male friend, you will get pretty much a floor show as he runs through his repertoire. You see, it’s not just me who likes the fact that he signs; he seems to like it too… He can ask for things he wants, he can have wonderfully visual tantrums and he can express his feelings towards strawberries (loving adoration) and sweetcorn (wretched poison). We can waste whole hours simply signing ‘No’ and ‘Yes’ back and forth until one of us gives in, or dies of exhaustion, and nobody else in the room will ever know we were arguing.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – I am acutely (far too acutely) aware that I am the only deaf person in my immediate family. My son is not like me, or at least not yet, and I don’t want my deafness to impact on him negatively. And, genuinely, I don’t think that it does. I think it opens him up to a whole other world, and different communication skills.
But I don’t want him to learn signing at the expense of speaking.
So, I did the usual thing. I researched.
It started out as just a brief encounter with a few websites discussing pros and cons of baby sign language classes, but, as you know, I do enjoy my wearing my researcher hat. I have delved into official documentation, scientific research papers and, for my sins, Mumsnet.
Guess what? It’s not an urban myth. It’s not a lie spread around by deaf people to make their species seem more useful to society. Signing really does help babies with their speech and language development.
As one paper summed it up:
“For me, there are three different levels of support for BS: first, there is indicative, if not evidentially strong, evidence from BS research for benefits; second, there is related evidence from deaf sign and hearing gesture/language research; third, there is compelling anecdotal support from families who have embraced the approach.” (IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER; Here the writer is using BS as shorthand for ‘Baby Sign’ not, y’ know, the other thing…)
It is now widely accepted that simultaneously signing and talking with babies floods them with language in a way that can only be beneficial. Signing is generally held up as an easier option for young minds to grasp, which is true but oversimplified; speech requires the palate and tongue to be developed, which can only come with time, whereas sign language requires only basic motor control of the arms and hands, which develops earlier.
It is because of these different rates of development that, often, a toddler will start to sign before they speak. It’s just physically possible to do this earlier than it is to wrap your tongue around words other than “Waaaaarrrrrghhhhheeeeeeeeaaaaaarghhh”. Picking up sign doesn’t mean that a hearing child will never learn to speak, but it does give them an earlier access to language which might well improve their speech when it arrives.
For me, the issue is no longer about my boy not speaking as much as other people would like him to. The issue is their expectations of children; “But The Book says they must have a vocabulary of fifteen words by thirteen months old! And he only has ten, four of which are variations on ‘poo’!”
Well, no child ever read The Book. If I had my way, no parent ever would either. Just let them do their own thing; I think they’ll surprise us all. Particularly if their first word is actually a sentence; “Daddy, I want a lemur.”
Which reminds me; I still don’t know the sign. I’ll go and ask my son.
For further detail, you might like to read;
http://www.virginia.edu/psychology/childdevelopmentlabs/media/baby-sign-msnbc.pdf
http://www.babysignlanguage.com/basics/research/
http://www.thepsychologist.org.uk/archive/archive_home.cfm/volumeID_21-editionID_159-ArticleID_1330
Emily Howlett is a Contributing Editor to this site. She is a profoundly Deaf actress, writer, horsewoman and new mum. Emily used to be found all over the place, but motherhood has turned her into somewhat of a self-confessed homebody. She now has not one, but four grey eyebrow hairs. C’est la vie. She tweets as @ehowlett
The Limping Chicken is the world’s 6th most popular disability blog. Check out what our supporters provide:
- Phonak: innovative technology and products in hearing acoustics
- Bellman: hearing loss solutions
- Ai-Live: Live captions and transcripts
- Deaf Umbrella: sign language interpreting and communications support
- Sign Video: Instant sign language support online
- 121 Captions: captioning and speech-to-text services
- Signworld: online BSL learning and teaching materials
- SDHH: Deaf television programmes online
- Sign Solutions:, language and learning
- Sign Lingual: BSL interpreting and communication services
- Action Deafness Communications: sign language and Red Dot online video interpreting
- Hamilton Lodge School in Brighton: education for Deaf children
- RAD: financial advice for Deaf people
- STAGETEXT: theatre captioning
- Krazy Kat: visual theatre with BSL
- SignHealth: healthcare support for Deaf people
- Deafinitely Theatre: theatre from a Deaf perspective
- Lipspeaker UK: specialist lipspeaking support
- Sign Language Days: Sign language learning in schools
Janner
June 13, 2014
As a hearing parent who had his son signing (all be it makkaton rather than BSL) I would like to firmly slap the people you had conversations with, except the last one. I echo their sentaments.
Seriously though. Why would anyone have a problem with it. Like you said it allows children to begin communication before they can use speech.
Sandra Dowe
June 13, 2014
Agreed signing is good for babies and also for all adults including heariing. Should be taught in schools with children from nursery to 6th form.
Clara Wood
June 16, 2014
Completely agree. Learning to communicate and experience the world through a visual modality is a huge benefit to everyone. Hearing people (like me) who haven’t been exposed to this from a young age really are missing out on something wonderful.
Jules
June 13, 2014
Love your article. You arts absolutely right both my (hearing) children signed before they could talk. It has not affected their speech in any way, children develop at different rates which is most likely why your son may not talk as much as another person’s child. Your children will grow up with a more open minded view of language and communication.
Incidentally putting subtitles on for children’s shows so you can watch them with your children does them no harm whatsoever and may even help them with their literacy skills. My older child could read before she started school and even now prefers to watch programmes with subtitles add she finds it really strange without them!
Editor
June 13, 2014
I agree, my daughter suddenly was able to read when she was four, and although we also read to her every night, we think subtitles were part of that! Charlie (Ed)
Tim
June 13, 2014
Abraham Lincoln once said:
“I believe it is an established maxim in morals that he who makes an assertion without knowing whether it is true or false, is guilty of falsehood; and the accidental truth of the assertion, does not justify or excuse him.”
That certainly applies to those who claim that signing impedes the development of spoken language and sadly, the claim is not even an accidental truth. It is turning out that the opposite is true.
It was an assumption, and I do wonder why it was so often made when few people would consider the learning of one language when young to be an impediment to learning another. Perhaps they were just projecting their own surdophobia.
Megan
June 14, 2014
I’ve had one of those “um” moments too. I teach ASL to hearing children including my own in the U.S.
A store clerk told me that her granddaughter “did that” (signed), but she is talking now. I said “Great! This is an awesome time to introduce her to the signed alphabet. It helps with phonics, early literacy skills, and can just be fun.” To which she replied, “well we don’t want her to get too smart.” Me -“um.”
Runaway Train
June 15, 2014
*facepalm* to the ignorant conversations. Language is language, regardless of whether it’s spoken or signed – we all know that of course, if only the general public also all knew!
A technical point, in response to this article’s title: From my research (albeit undoubtedly less extensive than yours), it seems that forms of SSE – i.e., baby sign / Makaton – have no impact on linguistic development, rather, they allow the child to express themselves sooner simply because it’s physically possible to sign earlier than speak. However, BSL as a distinct language naturally brings all the benefits of the child growing up bilingual. Thus any form of signing with children is always going to be beneficial, but the precise nature of the impact depends upon whether that signing merely facilitates earlier expression of the child’s native language, or is enabling them to grow up bilingual. (Either way, even as a mere Makaton user for work with a background of limited BSL learned at a school club, my conclusion is always: sign with your kids, people!)
Leah
June 23, 2014
What *is* the sign for lemur?
Richard
June 29, 2014
I have a hearing daughter that was almost one years old. I am hard-of-hearing, and I taught her how to sign a few basic words. She was able to talk to me in sign language, before she learned to speak. We would both, mostly sign to each other when we were both eating together. When we went out in public places, hearing people would watch us do sign language together, and they all thought that she was deaf. But, when they ask me if she was deaf, I said no, she is hearing and I am hard-of-hearing. People were surprise to see her do sign language at such a young age. She looked so cute doing sign language with her little fingers and hands. If you teach a child sign language at a very young age, you would be surprised at how smart they can be when they grow up. My daughter is now 18 years old.