A recent episode of Kitchen Nightmares had the host, Chef Gordon Ramsay, excoriating a family about its restaurant, Sam’s Mediterranean Kabob Room.
The Chef initially asks the whole family to take turns pointing out why the business isn’t improving. It’s painful to watch. At this point, the father and mother start crying. It’s obviously a real breakdown. The chef watches for a split second then stands, says he’s going to give them a moment, turns, and leaves.
At this point I subconsciously notice, maybe because of my sign language skills, that he shrugs and widens his eyes as he turns to leave, looking almost directly at the camera. It’s a quick second, a lightning flash of an event.
I noticed Ramsey raise his hand slightly before the camera switched to a close up of the father’s face. Even though it was just one or two frames, it seems to me he was telling the cameraman to get the hell out of there.
If my reading is correct, I agree with him. There is such a thing as tasteful and respectful. The camera chose not to follow the Chef’s orders, clearly, and I wondered why.
Was it the producer? The editor? In that moment, I had a different view of the host, maybe one that wasn’t intended to be received by an American audience that didn’t use sign language, maybe not by one that didn’t have experience moving between cultures.
I realized I was suddenly reading many different stories, narratives intended and unintended by the editing and juxtaposition. I read a story of camera decisions and editorial choices, another story of intended messages, a third story of conflict and media organizations.
How do you teach that? Is that what we mean by literacy in today’s world? Being able to read between those lines?
Readers should be critical of any source. The sociologist and historian James Loewen uses as an example a history textbook that told elementary school children that Abraham Lincoln was born in a log cabin he built himself with his own hands. Clearly this isn’t a historically-based observation. Even in the classroom, we’re giving children ‘edutainment.’
How do I give the necessary decoding skills to a high school student?
As a critical deaf writer who teaches, I ask new deaf teachers: What is the point of teaching math, social studies, and English in a digital world to deaf children? What skills do we want children to have?
I recall my own childhood spent in classes where the emphasis was on pronunciation rather than percipience. My parents, rather than my teachers, taught me to look at something as simple as Kitchen Nightmaresand see it as three, four, even five or six sometimes conflicting texts, giving me messages about producers and participants; what they think the audience thinks; and what they want the audience to think.
Then I think about a student watching, say, The History Channel, or the Discovery channel, and watching entertainment presented as education. Perhaps literacy today means giving students the tools to begin making those distinctions for themselves.
John Dewey claimed that education was the necessary foundation of democracy because without education, citizens cannot meaningfully participate. They cannot critically engage with information.
This applies to every discipline. Students need literacy in math, social studies, English, and even literacy in television and computers. They need to develop these skills in tandem, because, like on Kitchen Nightmares, everything will be presented to them at the same time.
When Fox News reports that 59 percent of people believe scientists falsified information to support claims of global warming — and the number of their participants add up to 120 percent, students need critical math, social studies, and critical media skills to be literate enough to respond. Literacy is everywhere, and we are always learning.
We all need a living banner to our career, something to judge the world and our own actions by. It can be a question, a quote, or anything that helps to focus us as we work.
This is part of mine: Finding ways to keep teachers who work with deaf children focused on critical literacy, more than simple concrete understandings.
In an unequal world, deaf people often need different types of learning for survival, productivity, and a good future. And this lesson both takes and gives back when it comes to teachers who work with other children, because it’s a truth for all of us, and remembering this truth has benefited me greatly as a teacher working in the mainstream, in adult education, in deaf schools and now with young, future teachers.
What’s your living banner as a teacher or educator? What leads you as you work? And can you see it between the lines of something as seemingly disconnected as a cooking show on television?
This article was first published on Noodle, and can be found here: http://www.noodle.org/noodlings/nlbC3/how-a-deaf-educator-teaches-critical-literacy-with-media-and-technology
Joseph Santini is a writer, social worker and educator. He’s worked in public schools and adult education for the past fifteen years. He is an expert on Deaf education for Noodle, and has written about education for the New York Times LessonPlans blog, DeafEcho, a Deaf-oriented political blog, The Odyssey and The Endeavor, the magazine of the American Deaf Children’s Society; he recently gave a TEDx presentation about intersectionality and Deaf education. He is currently doing Ph.D. research in the area of bilingual education and evaluation at Gallaudet University where he works in the Office of Bilingual Teaching and Learning and, in his free time, writing screenplays.
Photo by Renato Ganoza.
The Limping Chicken is the world’s 6th most popular disability blog. Check out what our supporters provide:
- Phonak: innovative technology and products in hearing acoustics
- Bellman: hearing loss solutions
- Ai-Live: Live captions and transcripts
- Deaf Umbrella: sign language interpreting and communications support
- Sign Video: Instant sign language support online
- 121 Captions: captioning and speech-to-text services
- Signworld: online BSL learning and teaching materials
- SignHealth: healthcare charity for Deaf people
- Lipspeaker UK: specialist lipspeaking support
- SDHH: Deaf television programmes online
- Sign Solutions:, language and learning
- Sign Lingual: BSL interpreting and communication services
- Action Deafness Communications: sign language and Red Dot online video interpreting
- Hamilton Lodge School in Brighton: education for Deaf children
- RAD: financial advice for Deaf people
- STAGETEXT: theatre captioning
- Krazy Kat: visual theatre with BSL
- Sign Language Days: Sign language learning in schools
pennybsl
July 1, 2014
## Fabulously relevant, seriously.##
This should be standard fare for trainee educators working with deaf children, current educators and professionals with deaf children and deaf people, and us Deaf people ourselves.
I too have captured such instances on TV with my Deaf Eyes – thank you, comrade from across the Pond, for this brilliant penmanship.
Most of us Deaf teachers working with deaf children have the same multi-stranded questioning & thinking skills in our work.
We thank BATOD (British Association of Teachers of the Deaf) http://www.batod.org.uk in its current ongoing support and endorsement of Deaf professionals (at all levels, from TAs to ToDs, even as Head of Units) working alongside skilled hearing Teachers of the Deaf in the UK.
We also look forward to the newly merged ADEPT (Association of Deaf Education Professionals and Trainees) http://adeptuk.co.uk/ doing likewise.
We have ‘Deaf Gordon Ramsays’ whose skills in being brutally direct whose skills could be channelled into excellent teachers / language support professionals – making positive impact upon deaf children and their own families and communities.
Looking forward to more of your writing, Joseph, via the Limping Chicken and esteemed UK publications / blogs.
Thank you! 🙂
Tony West
July 1, 2014
My deaf partner’s literacy or lack thereof is a constant handicap for us both. Your example of Mr Ramsay made me wonder about political debate and how difficult it is to infer from other clues what is being said between the lines. If indeed one can even read the lines in the first place. A few alarming trigger words can completely ruin our day like you would not believe.
Tomato Lichy
July 2, 2014
Wonderful article, thanks Joe.
I would remark that teachers of the deaf also need to focus their own critical thinking / literacy skills inwards and upwards, at what they are being told about wilful sign deprivation (aka oralism) by their trainers, their superiors, audiologist colleagues, their training materials.
Who formed that viewpoint for them and how does it benefit them? Yes speech is important for deaf children, but why work so hard to deprive deaf children of developing confidence in both their speech and their signing skills?
Another question would be why do so many educational workplaces, even ostensibly sign-friendly educational workplaces, consistently fail to include ‘improving sign skills’ as part of the statutory ‘continuing professional development (CPD)’ process?