There has been a number of articles in recent months promoting the idea that Deaf characters in films should be played by Deaf actors. I wholeheartedly agree…in theory.
Globally, there are undoubtedly talented and inspiring Deaf actors who could do justice to lead roles and play Deaf characters with total authenticity; and one spin-off would be that, internationally, our culture and language would likely be embraced should these actors, and the films they star in, be successful.
However, purely from a commercial viewpoint, it’s all about finding the money (isn’t it always?). And here’s why…
My name is Brent Macpherson (yes I’m Deaf) and am currently the Producer of the multi-million dollar feature film Silent Fear, to be filmed in a university for the Deaf in Scotland.
The director is based in Hollywood and one of the cast is former Hercules TV star Kevin Sorbo who is also based in LA. We are currently searching for an A-list actress for the lead role.
I would like to share with you my experience to date on this exciting feature film production.
Being the producer of a feature film is an extremely complicated undertaking – more so in this case given the complexities of Silent Fear, which requires Deaf characters to interact with normal-hearing characters throughout.
I’m acutely aware Deaf actors should have the opportunity to take on prominent roles as Deaf characters whenever an opportunity arises. However, it’s not that simple.
If a producer and/or director cast a little known Deaf actor to star in a feature film, or even to play a major supporting role alongside an A-list actor, that could spell doom for the film at the Box Office and would likely scare off investors.
Known and respected (and preferably A-list) actors are a brand, and from a marketing viewpoint the better the brand the more likely the film’s investors, distributors and producers will get an acceptable return on their investment.
The screenwriters of Silent Fear spent considerable time researching Deaf people, their culture and their language. I must have received hundreds of emails from them asking me questions about generic Deaf issues.
They (the writers) are as passionate as I am about having as many Deaf people as possible on location, but at the end of the day, producers are always mindful of investors wanting to maximise their returns.
The more stars attached to a movie, the smaller the risk to investors and distributors.
Should we choose a Deaf actor to star, or even to play a major supporting role, in Silent Fear, investors will head for the hills. However, that won’t stop us casting Deaf actors for smaller supporting roles or for the many extras (Deaf students and teachers) we require.
In fact, we will need numerous Deaf people in this film.
I’d love to think we could unearth a genuine Deaf star of the future – one who could go on to stand astride the commercial film world and become known and respected internationally.
Hopefully, at the very least, Deaf actors will become more marketable for investors and producers to consider for future films. What a wonderful thought!
Brent Macpherson got his first taste of professional acting when he scored the lead role in the highly acclaimed theatre show A Spectacle of One. He subsequently landed the lead role of Hank Williams in the short film I’m So Lonesome I could Cry, which was selected for Cannes Film Festival. He went on to act in television series in New Zealand, founded the New Zealand Deaf Short Film Festival, and established his own production company, Stretch Productions. In collaboration with 3D cinematography specialists Shotz Productions, Brent is developing Silent Fear, a multimillion dollar feature film Silent Fear.
The Limping Chicken is the UK’s deaf blogs and news website, and is the world’s most popular deaf blog.
John David Walker
February 3, 2015
Marlee Matlin never reached for stardom until a casting director decided to give her a role in Children of a Lesser God. Yes, ok, it is a risk but isn’t making films about Deaf people always going to be a risk. Otherwise, our cinema will just be full of formulaic blockbusters with a lack of innovation and imagination.
Hartmut
February 5, 2015
Mark Medoff, the author of “Children of A Lesser God” explicitly requires deaf actress to cast Sara and other deaf characters and a hard-of-hearing to cast a hard-of-hearing supporting character, when he sold his play to Hollywood. It is part of the contract.
The same happens across the nation on several professional stages and in foreign countries, for example, in France a previously unknown Deaf actress Emmanuelle Laborit was chosen for the role of Sara, and she received the Moliere Award, te highest acting award in France.
WLMager (@wlmager)
February 3, 2015
“Otherwise, our cinema will just be full of formulaic blockbusters with a lack of innovation and imagination.” – er, it already is John! Don’t tell me you’re not looking forward to The Avengers 2 or Captain America 3?
There’s another counter argument to why you can’t cast an unknown deaf actor – often the hearing actor cast to play the deaf actor is an unknown themselves. See Rinko Kikuchi playing a deaf character in Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu’s BABEL, for example. Catalina Sandino Moreno isn’t exactly a household name, yet she’s just been cast in the role of a ‘deaf mute’ – which has caused uproar in America with the #deaftalent hashtag.
We’re doing something on this issue for See Hear at the moment, and from what I’ve seen so far the solution seems to be three fold:
Firstly more training is needed for deaf actors so that they have more to offer a director when they audition for a part. It’s not just being deaf and having sign language, it’s being able to actually ACT and blow people away with your talent so that they have no choice other than to cast you.
Secondly – there’s no reason why a relatively unknown deaf actor could be cast opposite a big name lead actor as a co lead. That’s how Marlee Matlin was able to be a star – because she was playing off William Hurt, who back then was a huge star of stage and screen.
Thirdly – as always people are focusing too much on the talent on camera. If more deaf people were given roles behind the camera as writers, directors or even on set monitors then the production companies might feel more confident in casting deaf roles.
That’s just my personal view though…
Another interpreter
February 3, 2015
How sad that it is ALWAYS ABOUT THE MONEY.
Cathy
February 3, 2015
This is what i’ve always said about interpreters themselves! They are only in it for the money, when I have asked for help on a voluntary basis it has only been taken up once and even then I paid for their petrol to get to the venue and back.
Once they have reached level 6 you sometimes find an air of arrogance: they wont budge from their usual cost and say: “Iam level 6!” The irony that they wouldnt be where they are if deaf people hadn’t taught them their language in the first place, seems to be lost on them!!!
Yet, deaf people are still left floundering because the costs are astronomical!!!! Maybe this is a problem for deaf actors too?! Remember Ally in Coronation Street? She didnt last long did she? I wonder why?!?!
Megan
February 3, 2015
Well, it is their job. Frustrating and expensive as paying an interpreter may be, the problem lies with lack of funding from government spending.
Interpreters provide a service, regardless of whether the deaf community trained them. Asking interpreters to do voluntary interpreting because they owe it to the community is like asking a paid per hour person to do unpaid overtime. In fact, unless you’re very good friends with them and asking a one off favour, that’s precisely what it is.
Jules Dameron
February 3, 2015
Is this article implying that you guys will consider hiring hearing people to play the leading deaf roles? If so, then that’s something that I would naturally frown upon because if it were me, I’d sacrifice the project, rewrite the script or anything else or not be a part of something that involved a hearing person playing a deaf role. And I’m a film director, and so I get it.
Cathy
February 3, 2015
It is interesting that there is a Director who will “go against the grain” and cast deaf actors in a major film. I wonder, Jules, if when, you have your “changed film” up and running at the box office with your leading deaf roles etc it turns out to be a box office flop, you will be just as dismissive about the hundreds of thousands of pounds that have gone straight down the swany!!!
It is understandable for investors to run for the hills in these new situations with unknown deaf actors. Such actors must prove they are worthy of a leading deaf role and this is where training comes in. They then have to be strong enough and confident enough to enter themselves for these roles. It is a sad fact that deaf actors using sign language can only play deaf roles and could never play a hearing role unless they have speech. It is therefore all the more important to get themselves known in such a competitive field as acting.
Hearing actors could, with their experience, play a deaf role blindingly well and this is what real deaf people as actors are up against, especially as they are, in real terms, just being themselves! The irony is they have to act in a deaf role as though they are not deaf, to compete against the best hearing actors who have the greatest experience and could act a deaf role better than they could!!!!! Although this is open to objectivity!!!
Brent Macpherson
February 5, 2015
Hi Jules – I was a professional actor back in the 90’s and can fully understand Deaf actors should have lead and/or main supporting roles for major films. I absolutely support the idea of having Deaf people playing as Deaf characters for a commercial film. The problem is, executive producers and/or investors become a little wary if I appoint an ‘little known’ Deaf actor for Silent Fear to play alongside with internationally known actors, it’s extremely difficult to finance the film. It’s all about minimising their investment hence appointing good directors and A-list actors. My company has an Option Agreement (OA) that is valid for a few years and if I keep pushing for a Deaf actor and didn’t succeed in financing the film, I will lose the OA. My days as a producer of Silent Fear will be long gone! It puts me in a difficult position. I wish there is a Deaf billionaire somewhere out there! I trust this is helpful to you.
Tim
February 3, 2015
A pile of excuses.
Cathy
February 3, 2015
I can see your point Megan, but I can’t say I agree. The biggest factor with interpreting is that you are actually helping another person, to access what everyone else takes for granted. It is the kind of job that requires great altruism, something that the majority of jobs do not involve. A person doing overtime cannot be compared because overtime is directly for that working person’s benefit and is therefore the total opposite of altruism. At least interpreters could help voluntarily alongside other paid work.
There has to be a way for deaf people to be affordable workers because at the end of the day if deaf people are doing nothing, then so is the interpreter!!!
Emma
February 3, 2015
So the same logic would go for doctors, nurses, dentists, translators, aural interpreters and any other profession dealing with people? Voluntary work is a choice and nothing that should be expected just because a person has a specific job title. Helping out a friend is one thing but expecting interpreters to do voluntary work “just because” is a preposterous idea.
Cathy
February 4, 2015
Yes Emma, voluntary work is a choice, but that is where altruism comes in!
I wouldn’t say the same logic applies to Doctors and Dentists etc, no, for the simple fact is that interpreters are helping deaf people TO WORK!! That makes a fundamental difference!!! Other professions are NOT helping deaf people to work or anyone to work; especially where experience needs to be built up. Visiting the Doctor is because your ill, not because of work, the Dentists is likewise: you go to have your teeth sorted out, not for working!!
Deaf people who are actors or teachers (not BSL) require experience which is fundamental to work. This is where we fall down!
Having mentioned other professions: Doctors also require altruism, but when Labour told them: not to worry, dump your out of hours service and we’ll give you more money!!!!! Absolute madness!!! And look where we are now: NHS in absolute crisis, Doctors couldnt careless as theyr raking it in and altruism has gone with the wind!!!!!
It is vital that interpreters take on some altruism for the sake of deaf people who want to work or carry on working, by reducing their charges or helping out voluntarily along with paid work. Otherwise for the deaf community we are in just as much a crisis as the NHS!!!!!
Jules Dameron
February 3, 2015
The filmmaking world is not an easy place to work with, but I’ve worked for years and I’ve already put myself to the test. It’s easy now. I don’t want to make a choice where I can’t live with myself to the rest of my life. Films are forever. Once made, they are permanent, basically. So I think it’s absolutely worth it to put in the work and effort beforehand that it needs. And besides, if I worked with investors, they’d be the kind that are open to deaf people. Otherwise, I’d hit up crowdfunding. Another great source of $$ that will support deaf actors.
Shaneybo
February 3, 2015
Hire a big name (hearing) and cast him/her as a hearing character. No harm in having two main characters one deaf one hearing. Look at the Harry Potter movies – Dumbledore is one of the two main characters even though he was in the background most times…it can work. Why does it have to be one main character?
Jules Dameron
February 4, 2015
There are ways to make films or shows successful with deaf leading characters. I truly believe this. I’ve done research on marketing films for years, as well as research on involving deaf characters and sign language and how they can be created into a profitable business. For starters, “Switched at Birth”, “Sue Thomas: FB Eye” was a success. There are ways to tell stories that work.