As someone who works in signed song – that is, performing songs in sign language – my first priority is always the comprehension of the signs. I take the responsibility of making lyrics accessible verrrrry seriously.
That doesn’t mean they have to look uninteresting, however. Oh no. One of the most beautiful aspects of working with sign language is how creative you can be with it, producing visual pictures and emotive shapes that convey what written lyrics express. To be understood and to also inspire is what I aspire to do with every signed song performance.
So imagine my disappointment when a well known mainstream band decided to employ sign singers (or deaf actors as they call them) for a live performance… I eagerly got in touch and received an email telling me that for the audition video we should not “mouth the words at all…”
They requested an an ’emotive signed performance’ without any lip pattern, something I find highly unnatural as a sign language user.
Who signs with their mouth completely shut?! Several words share the same sign, so by eliminating the lip pattern we can’t clarify which word we mean… How on earth is that accessible signing?
They sent me a link to a video they’d already produced with a signer performing with absolutely no lip pattern at all. There are also no captions. So the actual content of the song is lost. It’s just a straight faced lady signing randomly.
This isn’t the first time this has happened and I can empathise with the deaf artist who may have felt she had no choice but to follow the direction.
I’ve also worked on videos where the director has asked for things from the sign language “make this one bigger” or “do this one slowly” and despite my attempts to explain why the original sign should be kept simple I’ve been reminded that I’m only the signer after all; the director has full artistic control.
The saddest thing about working in this way is that not only are deaf artists giving up their language, they are handing it over to people who don’t know much about it at all; effectively turning the sign singer into nothing but a puppet.
“Sign this way” “don’t use your mouth” “exaggerate the signs” – all of this direction to make a piece of ‘art’ is taking away what sign language really is. A language.
By breaking it up and playing around with its delivery, we are taking away its power to communicate clearly and comprehensively. Sign language IS beautiful already. Let’s not allow it to be turned into a novelty by those who don’t understand its content.
We need more videos made by either deaf directors or directors with an understanding and knowledge of sign. We need to take back the reins when it comes to signed song performances and remember who we are signing for; the sign language users. If they can’t understand us, what truly is the point?
So it goes without saying that I shan’t be signing up to do this particular job. Sign language is not a novelty or something to be in awe of. I refuse to take it apart all for the sake of having a visual impact. And ultimately, I am most definitely, definitely not a puppet.
Rebecca-Anne Withey is an actress, sign singer and tutor of performing arts. A black country girl at heart, she now resides in Derby where she works in both performance art and holistic therapies. She writes on varied topics close to her heart in the hope that they may serve to inspire others.
K. Willsen
April 14, 2015
Imagine a spoken translation where the director controlled how the words should be pronounced:
“Don’t use intonation, make the vowels longer, exaggerate the stresses.” It might sound cute, but it wouldn’t mean anything!
Some people treat languages they don’t know as gimmicks; something that is cool and a bit odd, but not a serious method of communication.
Bee
April 14, 2015
I believe classical opera is exactly the misuse of a foreign language. Just sounds good, well kinda.
Mainstream pop singing abuses the language. Hip hop its even worse.
Welcome to the world, bay-bee grrrrrl.
Tim
April 14, 2015
This how oppression locks in and keeps us down. The hearing people are always the ones with the power. If we want the jobs etc we are under constant pressure to yield to this power.
Hartmut
April 14, 2015
Most texts in songs are in fact poor lyrics that are saved by music anyway. Adding to this is the fact that words too often cannot be heard, thus not understood, out of the noise that is called “music”. Asked a hearie what the song says, he could not do it. He claimed, he doesn’t care for them. Words just underpin the music, not the other way around as it should be. Just keep the mouth busy!
Don’t lend your beautiful hands to those stupid words. Tell them straight to their faces, the lyrics stink and not worth to be translated into sign language.
Many sign performers do not understand how to make a sequence of signs poetic. Just standing in a boisterous stance and making grandeous signs in English word order ain’t make the text lyric. They would be just transliterated English words saved by the deceptive performativeness of the signer.
Mark Smith
April 14, 2015
I admire your efforts Rebecca-Anne Withey.. Sign-song is a difficult genre – it is one that was created by the hearing community.- but that doesn’t mean the Deaf community can’t claim it as their own !
As far as I can see its history and roots are threefold
1) Deaf Schools and Units
Hearing parents and teachers who wanted to see their Deaf children enjoying music – loved an applauded it at school..
Hearing friends and siblings thought it was cool and liked to see it – even if they never fully understood what was signed they could here the music anyway. Deaf kids liked to have their parents and siblings approval (or not!)
The Deaf community was divided. Some loved it – and some hated it!
2) Interpreters, Sign Language Students and Codas
Hearing people have always wanted to make their favourite songs and music more accessible to their deaf friends and communicate why they love them. Interpreters often go for meaning and emotion – while signing students are more SSE. And Deaf sign language teachers have seized on this and seen signed song as a learning opportunity. Signed choirs can easily recruit level 2 students (at higher levels hearing students begin to realise its harder than they thought to sign poems and poetry)
3) Churches
Hymns and songs have always been important in Churches – many prayers and teachings are embodied in song – and Deaf churches and hearing churches with a sizeable Deaf community have had a rich tradition of signed song.
Sometimes this has been interpreted by missioners chaplains and interpreters – but often has been presented by Deaf members.
Some traditions follow the English – and others have focussed on BSL structures and “body rythm”
There is now a small corpus of Deaf created “song poems” used in churches without music or with a simple drum beat.
More recently there has developed an appetite for signing popular music on you-tube and social media. Much of it is a chance for hearing sign language students to show off to their hearing friends who know nothing about BSL ! Not very inspiring but matches most of the other stuff on facebook and you tube – so i suppose it is inevitable.
Finally as story I heard a few years ago. A church group went Africa to visit a missionary project there . On one of there visits they saw and heard a group of african women singing in traditional african style. The music and it lovely harmony and rhythms moved them emotionally “They are so full of the Holy Spirit” they thought…this beautiful song of worship and thanksgiving to God!
what they didn’t know was the women were singing a “health awareness” song about avoiding infection by washing and sterilising stuff
(hey but maybe the Holy Spirit is in that too)
Reminds me a bit of many hearing people when they watch someone singing a song!
Please stick at it Rebecca- Anne ! But don’t be surprised if the road to creating authentic BSL signed song isn’t a bit rocky along the way ..
Tony Nicholas
April 23, 2015
Now I am curious as to who the band you mention is!