Continuing our series of blogs on what’s changed over the past five years in relation to deaf children, this blog looks at welfare policy.
From DLA to PIP
One big change to affect deaf young people is the replacement of Disability Living Allowance (DLA) with Personal Independence Payment (PIP) for those over 16. Both DLA and PIP are benefits to support disabled people – whether they’re in work or not – with additional day to day costs associated with their disability. Deaf young people might use DLA to pay for, for example, specialist equipment to help them communicate or for the costs of travelling to audiology appointments.
The Government were clear from the outset that they wanted to reduce what the DLA budget would have been by 20% and to ‘focus resources’ on those who ‘most need it’. They also wanted to introduce a more rigorous assessment process.
When NDCS looked at the ‘thresholds’ for the new PIP benefit, it became apparent that there was a risk that many deaf young people who qualified for DLA may not qualify for PIP. This is because only those who have difficulties with communication all the time would get enough ‘points’ to qualify for the standard. This suggested to NDCS that only those who communicated entirely in sign language or who had additional needs would qualify.
Because of delays to the roll out of PIP, the full impact of these changes is not yet apparent. But we remain concerned that once it is fully rolled out, many deaf young people will lose out.
Access fails
Separately, there remain a number of issues with the claim process is designed. Frustratingly, the claim processed was based on an assumption that all disabled people can use the telephone. NDCS has found it challenging to get the Government to respond to the fact that many deaf young people may, because of their deafness, not actually use the phone. We do not believe that the benefit should have been introduced before checking that the claim process was fully accessible to everyone.
Some changes have since been made and claim forms can now be requested by post (though apparently not by email). However, this lengthens the process and the Government have said they won’t backdate the claim to when the form was first requested. NDCS continues to feel that this is discriminatory.
It should be noted that we do not know that the above changes would not have happened under a different Government and we are not aware of any commitments to reverse these changes.
More information on PIP can be found on NDCS’s website.
Our health warning from previous blogs applies here also – this blog is a simplified summary and does not attempt to cover everything or to touch on wider changes to welfare that may impact on deaf children. Again though, we hope it provides some food for thought though. Let us know what you think about our summary evaluation by leaving a comment below.
Read the original blog here: http://ndcscampaigns.com/2015/04/24/welfare-and-deaf-children-a-review-of-the-past-five-years/
The Limping Chicken is the UK’s deaf blogs and news website, and is the world’s most popular deaf blog.
Make sure you never miss a post by finding out how to follow us, and don’t forget to check out what our supporters provide:
- Phonak: innovative technology and products in hearing acoustics
- Ai-Live: Live captions and transcripts
- Bellman: hearing loss solutions
- Deaf Umbrella: sign language interpreting and communications support
- Clarion: BSL/English interpreting and employment services
- Appa: Communication services for Deaf, Deafblind and hard of hearing people
- SignVideo: Instant BSL video interpreting online
- 121 Captions: captioning and speech-to-text services
- Doncaster School for the Deaf: education for Deaf children
- Signworld: online BSL learning and teaching materials
- Action Deafness Communications: sign language and Red Dot online video interpreting
- Hamilton Lodge School in Brighton: education for Deaf children
- RAD: financial advice for Deaf people
- cSeeker: Online booking for communication support
- Krazy Kat: visual theatre with BSL
- Enable Support Services: Supporting Deaf children and adults in Suffolk, Essex, Cambridgeshire and Norfolk
- Exeter Deaf Academy: education for Deaf children
- SignHealth: healthcare charity for Deaf people
- Lipspeaker UK: specialist lipspeaking support
- CJ Interpreting: communication support in BSL
- SDHH: Deaf television programmes online
- Sign Solutions:, language and learning
- Sign Lingual: BSL interpreting and communication services
- Sign Language Days: Sign language learning in schools
Tim
April 26, 2015
The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats are Social Darwinists. They don’t want to pay to support disabled people, not even disabled children.
pennybsl
April 26, 2015
One Deaf friend, who rediscovered her Deaf Identity in her 30s, is struggling to get her deaf son’s PIP through.
He is ‘doing well at school’ but is socially excluded outside his learning; DWP ignored the potential risk to his mental health by rejecting the child’s claim twice to support his social needs
NDCS has been excellently supporting this family. However, everyone in the process is extremely concerned by the attitude of Government (DWP) in rejecting highly validated evidence of the deaf child’s needs. Money is wasted now as this case goes to court.
The constant rejection is creating ripple effects in the family, as well as community. The parents work and pay taxes.
It is unfair that the DWP is causing huge expenses on charities’ parts in the appeals process, even to court level.
It is like we pay our taxes TWICE over, with charity donations swallowed up by legal processes!!
It is no wonder we vote at the Election with sick hearts, having witnessed the ‘fraudent’ methods of Govenment departments mis-spending taxpayers’ money by ignoring and breaking the Equality Act concerning deaf children.
Cathy
April 27, 2015
The changes within the Social System are inevitable, given the high inexorable cost of Welfare payments.
It is a laudable aim to reduce the bill and as usual has repercussions for many who are in receipt of such aid.
Deaf people have only been inclusive of DLA in the last 20yrs or so and have therefore lost out compared to our disabled counterparts. It is a great shame that communication has not always been a part of disability.
Many deaf people, adults and children alike are going to lose out when DLA changes to PIP. I do not believe our needs will be factored into PIP because communication is not as straightforward as anyone thinks. Some of us wear hearing aids but they do not aid communication as everyone speaks differently and we can’t all lipread. In any case lipreading involves a lot of guesswork and can be hit and miss.
And how will those with cochlear implants fair? Will they lose out completely because they have a powerful aid to get by?
I fear no deaf person’s needs will be fully taken into account less still fully understood. We are in for a rocky and unstable time in the parameters of austerity measures.