The manifestoes are out, the politicians’ gloves are off and there’s just over a week to go until polling day.
Yet until recently, finding a concrete, worked through disability welfare policy in the parties’ manifestoes has been like looking for the Marie Celeste.
As a physically disabled and deaf woman I’m very interested in political parties’ policies on disability. Just as turkeys won’t vote for Christmas, I don’t want to vote for a party that hammers people claiming disability benefits with yet more cuts.
But wading through all the patronising talk of hard-working families in their manifestoes – does that mean that child-free people don’t work hard? – there are few references to disability.
The Tories have said they’ll make £12 billion of savings (aka cuts) in the welfare budget, whilst protecting pensions and their triple lock guarantee. So on whose heads are those cuts going to fall? They don’t seem to want to tell us, although leaked emails suggest that taxing disability benefits, restricting carers’ allowance and removing the contributory element of Employment and Support Allowance are all ideas on the table.
In their manifesto the Conservatives pledge jobs for all, but there’s no mention of the Access to Work scheme, which was cut back by the coalition government, that exists to help disabled people who need equipment or a support worker to their job.
The Tories say they want a fairer welfare system, but will cut the maximum amount a household can receive a year to £23,000 a year, with PIP and DLA being excluded from that figure. Is potentially removing Employment and Support Allowance from vulnerable disabled people who qualify for it because they have paid National Insurance contributions for years fair? I think not.
Labour too, although pledging to cut the budget deficit each year, haven’t nailed their colours to the wall and talked hard cash. They say they will cut the bedroom tax and champion better work and better pay but there’s no mention of measures to help disabled people stay in work, such as reinstating the axed Independent Living Fund, created to enable disabled people with high support needs to live and work independently. (Click here to see the Labour party’s disability plan in written text, and here for it in BSL, thanks to @RichardTurner on Twitter)
The Tory manifesto is published on their website in a not-very-accessible PDF format without the functionality to click through directly to the issue the reader is looking for (thanks to Twitter’s @BSLCrabb, we’ve discovered that Labour have a full BSL translation of their manifesto, which you can find here or watch below).
The Liberal Democrats’ manifesto, whilst it achieves the thumbs up for being much easier to navigate online, lacks policies about disability (Note: thanks to @MsLoloj on Twitter, we have now discovered that the Lib Dems have a separate disability manifesto, which you can find here). They say they want to cut £50bn less than the Tories and borrow £70bn less than Labour, but how will this affect disability welfare?
UKIP says in their manifesto that they oppose the bedroom tax but support the benefit cap. Once again there are no mentions of disability policies. The SNP has promised to block plans to cut Disability Living Allowance and Plaid Cymru’s manifesto states they want better help for disabled looking to find work, but, living in England, I can’t vote for either.
Finally to the Greens. The Green Party’s manifesto is published in alternative formats for visually impaired, deaf people and BSL users. Hurray! I scrolled through the PDF version.
There’s a section on disability. They pledge to increase the DLA and PIP budget by around £1 billion a year, provide an extra half a billion pounds for the adults aged 18 – 65 social care budget and raise the profile of the Access to Work scheme.
Of course disabled people cover every social spectrum and we’re interested in policies about the economy, health, education and the environment and so on, not just welfare.
Yet how come only the Greens bother to attract our vote? Do the other parties think we’re not worth the bother or are they too scared to upset voters who mistakenly equate disability welfare with scroungers and fakers?
Cameron, Miliband, Sturgeon, Woods and Farage need to up their game if they want to attract the disability vote and let’s not forget that there are millions of those votes waiting to be cast.
Penny Batchelor is a former BBC content producer and web editor who now works as a freelance journalist. Outside of work she likes to read, knit and watch thriller DVDs with the subtitles on.
The Limping Chicken is the UK’s deaf blogs and news website, and is the world’s most popular deaf blog.
Make sure you never miss a post by finding out how to follow us, and don’t forget to check out what our supporters provide:
- Phonak: innovative technology and products in hearing acoustics
- Ai-Live: Live captions and transcripts
- Bellman: hearing loss solutions
- Deaf Umbrella: sign language interpreting and communications support
- SignVideo: Instant BSL video interpreting online
- 121 Captions: captioning and speech-to-text services
- Doncaster School for the Deaf: education for Deaf children
- Signworld: online BSL learning and teaching materials
- Exeter Deaf Academy: education for Deaf children
- SignHealth: healthcare charity for Deaf people
- Lipspeaker UK: specialist lipspeaking support
- CJ Interpreting: communication support in BSL
- SDHH: Deaf television programmes online
- Sign Solutions:, language and learning
- Sign Lingual: BSL interpreting and communication services
- Action Deafness Communications: sign language and Red Dot online video interpreting
- Hamilton Lodge School in Brighton: education for Deaf children
- RAD: financial advice for Deaf people
- cSeeker: Online booking for communication support
- Krazy Kat: visual theatre with BSL
- Enable Support Services: Supporting Deaf children and adults in Suffolk, Essex, Cambridgeshire and Norfolk
Ramon Woolfe
April 29, 2015
Check out the Deaf London website where there are five videos in British Sign Language covering five subjects within the Manifestos from the five main politic parties.
http://www.deaflondon.org
queby
April 29, 2015
If someone receives benefits over and above their tax allowance, do they pay tax? I’ve tried to find this out for some time now!
Edis bevan
April 29, 2015
See the Liberal Democrats BSL version of their manifesto at http://www.libdems.org.uk/manifesto-british-sign-language
Dan Sumners (@sumnersdan)
April 29, 2015
There is only one reason why a political party seeks or doesn’t seek the votes of a particular group of people: because it will or won’t make any difference to their chances of winning.
But perhaps there isn’t such a thing as ‘the disabled vote’. Disabled people as a group only have one thing in common – they are disabled. Otherwise it is a group as diverse as the general population.
Disabled people have differing views on how the country should be run that have nothing to do with the fact they are disabled. So maybe it’s a good thing the parties aren’t treating them as a homogenous group that can be swayed simply by the promise of more money.
Dan Sumners (@sumnersdan)
April 29, 2015
queby – here’s a list of the most common (un)taxable benefits https://www.gov.uk/income-tax/taxfree-and-taxable-state-benefits
Tim
April 29, 2015
Excellent post, Penny.
The reason the parties don’t try to get our vote is because they think we won’t vote, or vote in big enough numbers to make any difference. So we can prove them wrong by voting.
People who want to promote ‘divide and rule’ amongst Deaf and disabled people will try to make out that there is no such thing as the ‘disabled vote,’ but together we can fight things like the closure of the Independent Living Fund and the bedroom tax, the latter of which has led to reports like this:
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/skelmersdale-bedroom-tax-victim-toes-9130405#ICID=sharebar_twitter
madabout04
April 29, 2015
Tim, I agree with you on both points; excellent post Penny; also this ‘divide and rule’ has to stop on every level.
I feel that ‘we’ have been pushed too far and now is the time to put our differences aside, and there are many within our relatively small community, as you say Dan.
I spend my days in a juxtapose position of despair and hope. Despair at the retrograde society we are now faced with and imminent acceleration of ‘more of the same’, opposed by the hope I feel from the strong and intelligent voices speaking out for what is right and just. More sub-sections of our community need to sit up and take note and follow suit (the interpreting profession to name one):
http://limpingchicken.com/2015/04/17/deaf-news-deaf-organisations-launch-common-purpose-to-influence-next-government/
I am asking for ‘more of the RIGHT kind of same’ please! 🙂
Toby Dawson
April 30, 2015
I think that Penny is incorrect about Nicola Sturgeon and her party, the SNP.
It’s possible because most of the news provider didn’t report on the fact that with the SNP’s recent conference that they had a BSL interpreter standing next to whoever was speaking to the crowd via Glasgow’s SECC.
And most recently, via the SNP’s manifesto launch, a BSL interpreter was present at the event.
Of course, with the BSL Bill Act in Scotland, the SNP, as the Scottish Government is giving their backing to the BSL Bill Act lodged by Mark Griffin.
If you read the SNP’s manifesto, one of their pledges are an end to the austerity, and to protect certain things which only can be good for Deaf people in Scotland and the rest of the UK.
The SNP’s manifesto was only released last week, and a BSL version is on its way tae us.
All in all, it’s absolutely positive for Deaf, hard of hearing and others from the SNP within a short space of time.
Hartmut
May 7, 2015
Interesting is the fact that most Deaf parliamentarians in the national and provincial parliaments are posted by the Green Party.
Here, I am attempting to list straight from the top of my head:
A woman in Iceland in the national parliament (I forgot her name, difficult to remember), who served only one term
Helene Jarmer in the Austrian national parliament
Helene Stevens in the provincial Flemish legislature (Belgium)
There is also one in the Berlin/Germany assembly.
There is one “Non-Green” parliamentarian in Hungarian national parliament and another one also from Hungary in the European parliament.
All of them use Sign language interpreters on a daily basis.