Many deaf people woke up feeling pretty down on Friday morning with the news that the Conservatives – and around £12 billion of welfare cuts – had taken power. But it didn’t take long for us to feel even worse.
I wrote on Thursday morning that the next government needed to stop the DWP from bullying Deaf employees by withdrawing the support they receive at work.
Within hours of the election result on Friday, the DWP website released an analysis, dated May 2015 which shows how a recent cap to the amount people can receive from Access to Work to support their jobs will directly impact on, and threaten, deaf careers.
In the document, the DWP admit: “For any cap, the majority of users affected would be Deaf or hearing loss customers, rather than belonging to any other impairment group.”
After the review, the government announced a cap of £40,800 in March, and this analysis shows them considering the effect of three different levels of cap, including one as low as £27,200 per year.
Here’s a screengrab from page 11 of the document:
The DWPs own figures show that of the users affected by the cap they’ve announced they are bringing in, of £40,800, almost 90% of them were deaf – a total of around 180 deaf people.
Each one of those people will now face trying to continue being as effective at their job with less access to the communication they need.
The document also states that overall, the DWP is aiming to move away from high-level awards in favour of “a shift towards lower average awards [that] would allow us to support more customers.”
This comes at a time when Access to Work is already seen as being in crisis by deaf people, with support being taken away from sign language users (many people I know) for any reason the DWP can think of.
I wrote about some of the recent cases that have come to light last week, but let me run through them quickly again.
Three weeks ago, Drew Budai, a support worker for Merseyside Society for Deaf People asked for two hours extra sign language support a week. The reply from the DWP told him that all of his sign language support was being taken away.
Some cases of support being rejected go further than just saying no. Lottie Powell, a direct payments adviser for a disability organisation in Brighton, received a letter from Access to Work claiming that her support workers were actually doing her job for her.
Nick Beese, a Senior User Experience Designer, started a new job at Amazon and then had to wait weeks for confirmation of sign language support for his new job, which involves attending up to four meetings or conference calls a day, and running design workshops.
Beese told last year’s Access to Work enquiry (which stated bluntly that the changes had “threatened the employability” of BSL users) that the uncertainty he went through had “shaken my confidence in my ability to follow my ambitions and develop my career.”
Indeed, Dame Anne Begg MP said as part of the report: “DWP’s recent approach to BSL is highly regrettable and betrays a fundamental lack of understanding of the BSL interpreting market and how BSL is utilised by deaf people at work. The costs of BSL are relatively high but it is unfair for the DWP to try to control costs by targeting a particular group in a way which threatens people’s ability to stay in their jobs.”
Things haven’t improved in the last five months, and now, with proof that the DWP knew what the effect of the cap on deaf people would be, but went ahead anyway, most deaf people in work aren’t expecting things to get better any time soon.
By Charlie Swinbourne. Charlie is the editor of Limping Chicken, as well as being a journalist, director and award-winning scriptwriter. He writes for the Guardian and BBC Online, and as a scriptwriter, penned the films My Song, Coming Out and Four Deaf Yorkshiremen.
The Limping Chicken is the UK’s deaf blogs and news website, and is the world’s most popular deaf blog.
Make sure you never miss a post by finding out how to follow us, and don’t forget to check out what our supporters provide:
- Phonak: innovative technology and products in hearing acoustics
- Ai-Live: Live captions and transcripts
- Bellman: hearing loss solutions
- Deaf Umbrella: sign language interpreting and communications support
- Clarion: BSL/English interpreting and employment services
- Appa: Communication services for Deaf, Deafblind and hard of hearing people
- SignVideo: Instant BSL video interpreting online
- 121 Captions: captioning and speech-to-text services
- Doncaster School for the Deaf: education for Deaf children
- Signworld: online BSL learning and teaching materials
- Action Deafness Communications: sign language and Red Dot online video interpreting
- SDHH: Project Development and Consultancy
- Mykasoft: Deaf-run Web Design Studio
- Hamilton Lodge School in Brighton: education for Deaf children
- RAD: financial advice for Deaf people
- cSeeker: Online booking for communication support
- Krazy Kat: visual theatre with BSL
- Enable Support Services: Supporting Deaf children and adults in Suffolk, Essex, Cambridgeshire and Norfolk
- Exeter Deaf Academy: education for Deaf children
- SignHealth: healthcare charity for Deaf people
- Lipspeaker UK: specialist lipspeaking support
- CJ Interpreting: communication support in BSL
- Sign Solutions:, language and learning
- Sign Lingual: BSL interpreting and communication services
shonajh
May 14, 2015
Hi Charlie some very worrying information indeed. Please forgive my ignorance but I read somewhere that some support for a few individual costs over £150k . I just wanted to understand a little of why the costs could be higher or above the £50 k mark. I am not saying thats too much but just going on that £50 k could employ a person full time as a support , then what type of support does an individual get for 3x as much. Is that because its for more than a Deafness/deafness support and includes say mobility or is it a mix of skilled support is needed. There has been quotes about 30% of costs for AtW is for taxis and this could be more efficiently managed , in one way that makes some kind of sense but how can that be true that 30% of AtW is for transport ?When someone makes the argument to cap the amount an individual can have for those that dont understand the complexity i guess they will assume that it’s only fair to have a cap. its all very confusing. Do you think there should not be any caps or upper limits at all ? I wish I was more informed so that I can put in layman’s terms to others.
Editor
May 14, 2015
Hi Shonajh, I’ve not heard of anyone being supported to the level of £150k or anywhere near. Could you send a link for where you’ve seen this?
In terms of the cost of support, that would reflect the demands of a person’s profession – for example if their job involved lots of face-to-face contact with other people, like a theatre director working with actors all day, for example.
What doesn’t help anyone I think is an arbitrary cap – because it places severe limitations on people whose job and effectiveness in their job depends on the right kind of support, and the Work and Pensions Committee said themselves that support shouldn’t be withdrawn just to save costs.
Charlie (Editor)
Sjhudson
May 14, 2015
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-measures-to-support-more-disabled-people-into-work . It is referring yo awards for anyone that qualifies for AtW not just for those who are Deaf/deaf. you answered my question anyway so thanks for that.
pennybsl
May 14, 2015
The Trade Unions (TUC, UCU, Unite, Unison etc..) have been alerted.
They will highlight the fact that Deaf people’s careers are endangered by ‘faceless and anti-equality impact assessment’ communications / handling by ATW civil servants, overseen by the DWP.
We need to do three things, ASAP:
1. Inform the general public about what is happening to Deaf & Disabled workers in the UK – the ripple effects of tyrannical administration are genuinely terrifying.
2. Getting together to provide the media with consistent news of what’s happening – we have become more articulate in 2015 since the ‘social earthquake’ of the last two years’ “Governmental-approved sabotaging” many Deaf & Disabled people’s careers.
3. Importantly, first and foremost: we are UK citizens.
We pay taxes and council taxes.
We are part of the UK workforce.
Even if we do not or unable to work, we still have a contributing role in society, households, families, friends and communities.
Deaf & Disabled UK Citizens – we do not deserve to lose what we have achieved, are achieving and would achieve in a supposedly inclusive world.
Dan Sumners (@sumnersdan)
May 14, 2015
Just for clarity, the analysis was done before the decision to introduce a cap on awards equal to 1.5 times the average salary. So a cap of £40,800 will be introduced in October 2015 for people applying to the scheme for the first time. People currently receiving awards greater than the cap won’t have it applied to them until April 2018.
Natalya Dell
May 14, 2015
STTR costs £75 an hour min… We are potentially even more screwed than BSL users if we need it regularly, especially co-working STTRs… I worked out 12 hours a week on average assuming ALL hours are remote or even less if needing in-person support…
We need to get people to understand AtW is NOT a benefit, it’s an investment and for every £1 put into it, £1.48 comes out as of 2005 nevermind now… Disabled/deaf people taken out of benefits and into jobs and potentially high flying careers, promoting equality of opportunity…
Do any of the deaf orgs fancy issuing a Judicial Review against DWP for this? I don’t believe they’ve considered Public Sector Equality Duty on this at all! There must be plenty of potential claimants. BDA? AoHL?
David Millar
May 14, 2015
I won’t bore you with the details but I had to surrender my licence for a year due to health problems. I was only able to retain my employment through AtW. If it is cut then many people in my circumstances would be unable to work. How does that fit in with a policy of getting people into work. Again it will be the disadvantaged who will be hardest hit
rich
May 21, 2015
what is STTR?
Editor
May 21, 2015
Speech to Text Reporter