It’s been reported that scientists think they will soon be able to treat some forms of deafness by using a virus to correct the genes that cause hearing loss.
Extract:
Scientists say they have taken a significant step towards treating some forms of deafness after restoring hearing in animals.
Defects in a baby’s DNA are behind roughly half of cases of hearing loss in early life.
The mouse study, published in Science Translational Medicine, showed a virus could correct the genetic fault and restore some hearing.
Experts said the results could lead to treatments within a decade.
Read the full story here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-33442820
Posted in: deaf news
pennybsl
July 9, 2015
Ahem…I am not being cynical….yes, animals could respond to sounds, but what about the ability to hear and respond to spoken words?
There is a difference in hearing fudged sounds and clear sounds depending on the restoration of the genetic qualities of hearing.
While the news are welcome in preventing genetic hearing loss, we hope this instance would not cause false assumptions and “so-called experts” to drop signing and other means of efficiently assistive communication – research has clearly stated BOTH deaf and hearing people need to maximise learning and social development via (65%) visual and (35%) audio channels.
Cathy
July 9, 2015
I think this sounds fantastic!! Who would have thought a virus could alter genetic material linked to hearing?
Anything that helps a child to hear better or at all has to be a bonus! Even though sign language helps communication, signing can never ever replace sounds such as music, laughter and voices. That is something born deaf people have no experience of so to bring this about within a decade will be absolutely amazing!!!
Today, with inroads made into Deafness and its various causes there are still many limitations and prejudice towards deaf people. This afternoon I had to visit an Occupational Therapist who was worried I would not manage care work, due to communication problems.
The employer had even asked: “how will she drive?” I was staggered!!! I told the lady I have been driving for 23yrs!!! Then they asked how I would ring for an ambulance? I said I would text the 999 system deaf ppl use. They asked how I would cope if person has head down mumbling……negative, negative, negative!!!
I for one can’t wait for more inroads into solving deafness then deaf people can DO anything!!! As things currently stand ANY job is NOT open to us!!
I say to hell with sign language, bring the research on!!!!!!
Eve
July 9, 2015
Although I only have a sound processing difficulty and not a ‘deafness’ as such. I’d feel quite uncomfortable about the idea of anyone attempting to ‘fixing’ me.
Yes my hearing ‘difficulties’ present me with many problems and the support I get through access to work for these issues, as well as for my dyslexia and dyspraxia, often lead to me in a room with some one quietly suggesting I try a different career, again, due to my inability to adjust or cope with out any adjustment.
I realise while many people would welcome the opportunity, I think for me my differences have become a part of my being and therefor my identity.
Yes, I would love that career where the job I do plays to all my strengths and the challenges I face melt away as the access I receive levels that playing field for me.
To have those parts of me ‘fixed’, by people who seem to have little understanding of what it is to be labled ‘broken’ when you dont believe you are, for me, is a uncomforting idea.
Here’s to an appreciation of diversity and options that suit a range of needs and situations, with out the uncomforting rhetoric.
Edis Bevan
July 10, 2015
I am just very sceptical about the quality of ‘science’ reporting’ in the media…. The BBC is not as bad as the Daily Wail but it still picks up on ‘miracle cure’ wonder stories too uncritically.
Basically I need a lot more information before I take this seriously.
I recommend the books by Ben Goldacre (starting with his ‘Bad Science’ book) which include explenations of just how bad and misleading reporting of scientific developments can be..
For a taster of Goldacre try this video. The subtitles are proper ones not Live Nonsense…
http://www.ted.com/talks/ben_goldacre_battling_bad_science
Tim
July 10, 2015
This could potentially cause serious ethical problems. Suppose some Deaf people don’t want to be cured, then what unfair pressures will they be put under?
Already, they are thinking about compelling some unemployed/disabled people to accept medical treatment as a condition for continuing to claim social security. You are on very dangerous moral ground when you force somebody to take treatment that they don’t want.
Deaf people who are employed may not be exempt from such pressures either. Both the government and employers may want to look to reducing the cost of in-work support, for example.
Hearing people sometimes seem to think that such a cure is always wanted and will always solve all our problems, but that is ignorance. I remember Charlie writing an article, I think it was called ‘Not everybody wants to be cured,’ something like that, and one of the most popular but ignorant – and disturbing – comments underneath was to the effect that ‘If Deaf people don’t want a cure, then all state support should be taken from them….’
So it’s not all good news for everybody.
cadiche
July 10, 2015
I see that we are still being seen as “broken” since we speak a different language to the Hearies. It wasn’t bad enough they butcher their babies with Cochlear Implants, now they want to mess with us by injecting a virus?
Here’s a thought… how about accepting us and learning to communicate with sign. It really isn’t that hard.