Extract from Consumerist.com:
An Arizona woman who worked as a Starbucks barista for seven years has filed a lawsuit against the company for allegedly discriminating against her because she’s deaf. She claims she repeatedly asked for reasonable accommodations to help her on the job and was repeatedly denied, and that she was finally fired because of her disability.
According to the lawsuit [PDF], the worker asked multiple times between March 2007 and January 2014 — when she was fired — for reasonable accommodations, such as sign language interpreters for staff meetings, training, and other important work events, and was denied in most instances.
“Between 2007 and 2014, [she] repeatedly requested reasonable accommodations to enable her to ensure effective communication, to perform the essential functions of her job, and to enjoy the benefits and privileges of employment,” the complaint states. “With these reasonable accommodations, [the plaintiff] would have been able to perform the essential functions of her job, such as taking customers’ orders at the front counter and at the drive-thru.”
After meeting with management and insisting on interpreters, she claims she was later fired as retaliation for filing a charge of discrimination with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. She says she was told she was fired having visible tattoos — which she’d had for the duration of her employment. Other workers also had visible tattoos, the lawsuit claims. And months later, Starbucks changed its anti-tattoo policy for employees.
donaldo of the wasatch
October 22, 2015
Base on a casual analysis of the data here, she will win and big. Hard enough as it is without adding drama of any kind that is necessary such as the tattoos Employers will look for all the excuses they can – don’t help them.
Rosie Malezer
October 23, 2015
Good for her. It is rare that Deafies are given the opportunity to work, but some employers do so to get financial benefit from the state, knowing full well that they will eventually fire the employee for something bogus, simply because they don’t want to put in the same commitment on behalf of the employee that the employee wants to put in on behalf of the company. These company deserve a butt kicking, and then some.