Erika Jones’ report on sex abuse at London’s Woodford school, which was shown on BBC2’s Newsnight last week, made after a year of painstaking research (read her article on it for this site by clicking here) stuck in my mind for days.
I’d already seen the report (which was made as a collaboration between Newsnight and See Hear), when it first aired on See Hear a few weeks ago, but seeing the interviews again, seeing those Deaf people tell their stories and explain how their experiences marked their lives, really saddened me, and made me feel angry about what they went through.
The fact is, there’s too many stories like these. Of vulnerable Deaf children, away from their families at boarding school, falling prey to people who think that they can take advantage of the communication barrier between those children and the outside world.
The part of Jones’ report that stood out for me in particular was how some of the children tried to tell the outside world what was going on.
Not knowing how else to articulate what was happening to them, they wrote the word ‘rude’ on pieces of paper and folded them into paper aeroplanes and threw them through windows. Passers-by “would pick them up, laugh and wave and go on their way and we would feel frustrated,” said one of the victims.
The powerlessness those Deaf people felt as children at Woodford School reminded me of the stories in the 2012 documentary Mea Maxima Culpa, which I saw recently on Netflix. That documentary is about how four Deaf American men protested against the abuse they suffered from a priest when they were children at a Catholic school.
That film showed how difficult it was for those Deaf men to find people who’d believe them, let alone for justice to be done.
In frustration, at one point, we see one of the men visiting the priest responsible, knocking on his door and confronting him. Even then, his anger is brushed away, dismissed, and his experiences are not recognised. It’s a monent that makes the blood boil.
Growing up in the Deaf community, I heard many stories hinting at dark events in boarding schools and in other groups that Deaf children were involved in.
Over the years, there have been regular news stories about incidents of sexual abuse involving Deaf children. We’re not just talking about decades ago, some of these news stories are very recent.
For example, this story from Quebec in Canada on Friday last week, where a $20 million settlement has been reached after 38 abusers were identified at a Catholic school for the Deaf, who abused hundreds of Deaf children.
We might assume that in the current education system, and with far more awareness of sexual abuse in wider society (not least after the recent cases involving celebrities) there’s better safeguarding of children. Better rules and regulations that make sexual abuse less likely.
We might hope that less Deaf children in the UK are affected by sexual abuse, and a case like Woodford School wouldn’t happen today, at least not to the same extent, not in the same way.
We might assume the risks are lower, but is it safe, or sensible to assume that? I don’t think it is.
Deaf children are still vulnerable to these kinds of incidents today, in this country. And they remain at higher risk than other children because of the communication barrier, because they can’t make themselves as easily understood.
If Deaf children are still vulnerable in this country and in America, what of schools in the rest of the world, in developing countries for example, where Deaf people are often generally viewed far less positively, where Deaf children are even less likely to be listened to?
Authorities everywhere need to realise how this kind of abuse can happen to Deaf children – and react to that risk.
At least here in the UK, there have been attempts to help educate Deaf children about what could happen to them, and what they can do about it.
One example came earlier this year, when I was lucky enough to work with Deaf director Bim Ajadi on an Underwear Rule film for the NSPCC (which I wrote) featuring Deaf characters.
The basic rule it tries to convey is that it’s wrong for people to touch Deaf children where their underwear is, and that the children should tell a trusted adult if it happens to them.
Watch (and please pass on) the video below.
But there needs to be more examples like this, more ways of illustrating the issue to young Deaf people so at the very least they are aware of what the boundaries are and what they can do about it.
On a broader basis, sex education remains an issue. As I’ve written about in the past (here’s a Guardian article from 2012) young Deaf people often don’t get all the information they need when it comes to sex education and that also makes them vulnerable, not only to sexual abuse as children, but abusive relationships later in life.
Although I felt horrified by the stories that were told on Newsnight and in Mea Maxima Culpa, I also felt a sense of deep admiration for the Deaf people who told their personal stories of what happened.
It must be so hard to talk about those kinds of things happening to you, but they did it on camera, in order to raise awareness and aid understanding of the issues within wider society and within the Deaf community too.
Without those people telling their stories, people wouldn’t be discussing these issues now. It’s so important that their stories are not forgotten.
Watch Erika Jones’ Newsnight report here and read her article for BBC News here.
By Charlie Swinbourne. Charlie is the editor of Limping Chicken, as well as being a journalist and award-winning director and scriptwriter. He has written for the Guardian and BBC Online, and directed the comedies The Kiss and Four Deaf Yorkshiremen go to Blackpool. His documentary Found, about people discovering the Deaf world, came out earlier this year.
The Limping Chicken is the UK’s deaf blogs and news website, and is the world’s most popular deaf blog.
Find out how to write for us by clicking here, or sign a blog for us by clicking here!
Make sure you never miss a post by finding out how to follow us, and don’t forget to check out what our supporters provide:
- Phonak: innovative technology and products in hearing acoustics
- Ai-Live: Live captions and transcripts
- Bellman: hearing loss solutions
- Deaf Umbrella: sign language interpreting and communications support
- Clarion: BSL/English interpreting and employment services
- Appa: Communication services for Deaf, Deafblind and hard of hearing people
- SignVideo: Instant BSL video interpreting online
- 121 Captions: captioning and speech-to-text services
- Doncaster School for the Deaf: education for Deaf children
- Signworld: online BSL learning and teaching materials
- Sign Solutions:, language and learning
- Sign Lingual: BSL interpreting and communication services
- Action Deafness Communications: sign language and Red Dot online video interpreting
- SDHH: Project Development and Consultancy
- Mykasoft: Deaf-run Web Design Studio
- BSLcourses.co.uk: Provider of online BSL courses
- deafPLUS: Money advice line in BSL
- Hamilton Lodge School in Brighton: education for Deaf children
- Lipspeaker UK: specialist lipspeaking support
- RAD: financial advice for Deaf people
- Krazy Kat: visual theatre with BSL
- Exeter Deaf Academy: education for Deaf children
- SignHealth: healthcare charity for Deaf people
- CJ Interpreting: communication support in BSL
Linda Richards
November 9, 2015
Thank you for this Charlie. Balanced as always. I’m not sure I can be…
It is not only true that these incidents have happened and blighted people’s lives, what’s also true is how the stories divide the Deaf Community with allegations of betrayal – presumably from shame the incidents being highlighted, they they might be, or are, involved as victims, that so many more are brought into the picture (friends, families, interpreters), that what was uncovered or suppressed is now under investigation. That differences are further marked – such as religious differences. That those victims, even now, are without the support they need.
One TV company I worked for offered counselling after filming someone’s horrendous experience of abuse. I said I didn’t need it but what about offering it to the person we’d just filmed? Apparently this wasn’t possible because they weren’t ‘staff’. I couldn’t fathom how we could intrude on someone’s life, create a whirlwind of emotions in capturing their stories, leave them and yet, after transmission, offer avenues of support for viewers who’d seen the programme about their very stories but not for them.
The challenge facing the Deaf Community is the code of silence it perpetuates, be it about child abuse, bullying, audism, illegal activities or other insidious behaviour. That jobs are at risk if we say anything. That people will carry the mental scars of maintaining the oppressive status quo. That people are ostracised at or barred from Deaf Clubs or other Deaf social circles because they ‘broke’ the code. Until we break that mould, there will continue to be such heart-breakingly sad stories.
There are further issues to consider. One Deaf organisation destroyed all the papers associated with an abuser. Why? Time-limited charges and a limited number of charges can only be brought to court. Why? Why can’t the judge’s erroneous decision in respect of Ingall and the Woodford School victims be dismissed and a fresh look at the case be taken?
Neither See Hear not Newsnight would have broadcast this item had it not checked the legal ramifications which leaves us with one scenario, that Ingall was guilty of such abuse.
Ingall may be dead but his victims are not. Let the records show his crimes and let’s support the victims who are still enduring the nightmares. After all, within the Deaf Community and the world of sign language, there are none of the communication barriers that these victims faced as children. Or are there? We must be vigilant. Always.
pennybsl
November 9, 2015
Fully agree with Linda Richard’s insightful comments.
The repercussions are wide-ranging: Deaf people affected by now-recognised unacceptable levels of abuse in institutions carry their burden throughout life towards their own friends, families and children.
Those actions by ‘trusted professionals’ “taint” many Deaf people’s professional capabilities without recourse for solutions.
Deep-seated psychological scars need appropriate support – trust in skilled Deaf & hearing professionals in mental health with clear processes in law and human rights.
At the same time it must be stressed that Deaf schools are not always ‘bad’ – it is all about the staff and lack of accountability.
One particular strand of abuse tends to be overlooked – verbal and psychological pressure on Deaf children that being ‘Deaf is a bad thing’.
Hartmut
November 9, 2015
Pennybsl’s last point is what we should also consider. We should name individuals in the educational establishment who said those things that malign being deaf as bad, such as “overcoming deafness”, “using speech garners praise and better jobs”, “using signs makes people think you are an ape”, “sign language makes you dumb/stupid”, “your signing is ugly because you made grimaces”, and many other similar admonishings.