The government has responded to representations from Signature and Sense to clarify that sign language users will not be prevented from working in customer facing roles by the new Immigration Bill.
The Bill proposes to make it a requirement that people working in public service customer facing roles be fluent in English or Welsh. Following representations from Signature and Sense, the government response to the consultation on the Bill says:
“The Government recognises the duty of public authorities to provide reasonable adjustments for staff who are disabled under the terms of the Equality Act 2010. The Code will make clear that people whose first or only language is a signed language are not prevented by the public authorities implementation of the duty from working in customer-facing roles. It will also make clear that the duty can be met by the provision of a suitable sign language interpreter for workers whose first language is a signed language.”
Jim Edwards, chief executive of Signature, said: “We welcome the government’s clarification that the language fluency requirements of the Immigration Bill will not discriminate against Deaf people.
“We will continue to work with the Cabinet Office to make sure the Code of Practice also protects public workers and members of the public by requiring public authorities to only engage sign language interpreters who are registered with NRCPD. Registration guarantees an interpreter is qualified, keeps their skills up-to-date, and is subject to a Code of Conduct and complaints process.”
Hartmut
February 23, 2016
Don’t be satisfied with this clarification. Insist on the change in the written declaration that governmental workers must be fluent in English, Welsh, or BSL.
Tim
February 23, 2016
Nice to see that the government takes the Equality Act seriously on special occasions.
Cathy
February 24, 2016
Not sure how much “ooomph” this has? I am currently taking a case to court for discrimination under the equality act as the company do not think I can cope with clients, as Iam deaf. So, expecting deaf employers to be in customer facing roles is not a high expectation. At least, I haven’t come across any myself and my battle proves they are rare.
It’s no good, the Government taking the Equality Act seriously, when nobody on the ground is doing so. Its a complete farce!!
It also inadvertently means that any foreigner could also claim discrimination if they are not allowed interpreters as a “reasonable adjustment” when deaf people are allowed to do so!! Food for thought eh?
WanderingMinstrel
March 4, 2016
“It also inadvertently means that any foreigner could also claim discrimination if they are not allowed interpreters as a “reasonable adjustment” when deaf people are allowed to do so!! Food for thought eh?”
The ‘reasonable adjustments’ are for disability, not being a non-native
sashadiestalCathy
April 8, 2016
Wandering Min, do you not think it is a disability not to be able to speak a certain language, regardless of whether someone is native or not?
It is also rather a weak argument when Deaf people often balk at being labelled “disabled!” They often shout out that they are “only Deaf!”
To this degree it also means that Deaf people do not meet the criteria for disablement under this legislation anymore than a non native does!
Wandering Minstrel
October 30, 2016
Sashadiestal, the legislation defines a disability as: “a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on a person’s ability to carry out day-to-day activities.” Non-natives not being able to speak a certain language is a disadvantage, not a disability. (Unless not being able to speak the language is a result of an underlying impairment, in which case it is still a disadvantage but in this case caused by a disability.) Whether or not Deaf people consider themselves disabled is a whole subject by itself, but they may be hard-pressed to argue that they don’t fit the criteria of the Equality Act.
Useful reference: http://www.pcs.org.uk/en/equality/guidance-and-resources/disability_equality_toolkit/Equality-Act-2010-Who-is-covered-by-disability-law.cfm
(I couldn’t find the ‘reply’ link under your comment so I don’t know if you’ll see this or not.)