As part of Channel 4 News’ #NoGoBritain series, the programme has made an item, which is subtitled, showing the difficulties that parents of Deaf children have accessing communication support – including facing fees of £3000 for BSL lessons so that they can communicate with their own children.
On Wednesday we reported on an NDCS report showing that a quarter of parents of deaf babies (25%) are not being given the support they need to develop crucial skills to communicate with their babies following identification.
This results in language delay at a crucial stage of development, which Deaf children struggle to recover from.
The Channel 4 video, which can be seen below (or directly on Facebook here) also shows how a pilot project in Belfast is helping some parents progress much more quickly in learning BSL. This project really should be taken up across the UK.
Rosie Malezer
May 13, 2016
I wish there were a dislike button at times like this. It is absolutely bloody ridiculous to charge the parents AT ALL to learn sign language when they have a Deaf child. Shame on Britain.
Finland are similar, in that when I was diagnosed as profoundly deaf, the government offered me sign language classes at the Deaf school in Helsinki… at a cost of almost 4,000€… and that was just for me. If my husband wanted to be able to communicate to me in sign language in our marriage, he would have to pay an additional 4,000€. When each of our annual incomes is just over 6,000€, it shows how truly ridiculous it is. I ended up learning ASL for free from a linguistics professor (Dr Bill Vicars) instead, and have been fighting for the past two years to have access to a speech-to-text interpreter – something they refuse since I use ASL instead of FinSL (which is irrelevant, since over 60% of Deaf don’t use sign language at all).
Governments lack brains and compassion when it comes to Deaf/hearing families.
Cathy
May 15, 2016
Why on earth are parents of Deaf children charged £3000 to learn BSL?! That is a joke!!! Basic signs for Deaf children can be learnt online for nothing!
To charge such fees is preposterous! I pray hearing parents do not pay anything like this sum out. Please contact Deaf clubs who could help. I also know of a mother n baby group running at Manchester Deaf Centre. Contact them and ask about their baby classes and groups. You will certainly save yourself £3000!!!
JR
May 19, 2016
I’m very grateful to Deaf Action in Edinburgh for a scheme that they ran for families with young Deaf children. They got funding to pay for two 10 week courses in BSL that were then followed up with a refresher course prior to paying for Level 1 tuition. Each course was attended by 10-12 families or so. Not only did we learn some basic BSL it helped us to meet other families in a similar position to ours outside of events run by NDCS. Since then our ToDs have also set up a weekly signing group for families with Deaf preschoolers
Harry
May 25, 2016
This makes me mad! Knowing that the parents have to pay for learning the sign language when they should be entitled to free basic learning. This is just ridiculous!
Anne Worsfold
May 26, 2016
One of the problems which the channel 4 film didn’t / couldn’t highlight is that even throwing £3,000 into teaching hearing parents to sign won’t solve the problem that very young children need constant, good quality language, and hearing parents can’t, in a short time-frame, be good language models in a language they are learning – any more than I could in Chinese.
Parents can learn how to make their own speech fully visible with Cued Speech (CS) in a week or less. There is also free e-learning for the basics and low-cost one-to-one tuition through Skype. The charity, Cued Speech Association UK, has a bursary fund for parents who can’t afford to learn. So deaf children brought up with CS have access to the language of the home (just like hearing children) without delay, and they develop an understanding of the language which surrounds them in education, work and wider society.
CS works very well bilingually with BSL, so this is not an ‘either / or’ comment. Nor is it a ‘CS is better than BSL’ comment (which wold be like saying English is better than French). CS is JUST English made visible. On a practical level though, my personal observations are that, even with a huge amount of support, most parents (including myself) take years to be fluent in BSL. Consequently, if BSL is their child’s main or only language, and parents are their main language models, the children have impoverished language input – sometimes for several years – and that this impacts on their development. I feel that this is a bit of an elephant in the room!