Many of us in the Deaf community worldwide admire the way that Nyle DiMarco has gone about winning two high-profile American TV series in quick succession.
On America’s Next Top Model, he didn’t only excel during the modelling challenges, he also managed to show remarkable resilience even when, as Tara Schupner Congdon wrote in an article on this site, he experienced being marginalised in front of TV cameras during two months of living in a household of hearing contestants.
Then on Dancing with the Stars, he lit up the dancefloor week after week, which you could say is impressive because of his deafness, for the way he trained like a demon, using visual and tactile cues with his dance partner. But it was also impressive just for being good, full stop.
Skilled at modelling, skilled at dancing. Skilled as an actor too, as he showed on the TV drama Switched at Birth.
There’s plenty to admire.
But what’s really impressed me is how he’s consistently used his growing public profile to raise issues affecting Deaf people, particularly regarding giving Deaf children access to sign language at an early age.
Take his victory message after winning Dancing with the Stars as an example:
“This is for 70 million of Deaf people in the world! This is for all the Deaf kids suffering language deprivation. Only 2% of 70 million of Deaf people have access to education in sign language. More than 75% of parents don’t sign to their Deaf kids. Winning this is a HUGE step to ending LANGUAGE DEPRIVATION of millions.”
The truth is that there are very few high-profile Deaf people appearing regularly in the media, particularly on TV, and this is a big problem.
Before DiMarco’s rise to prominence, if you asked a typical American person in the street to think of a Deaf person, I think they’d probably mention Marlee Matlin, the Oscar winning actress, and, aside from one or two other less-well known Deaf actors that might crop up, that’s it.
In Britain, it’s worse. I don’t think the typical person on the street could come up with one single well-known Deaf name. They might have caught the odd episode of See Hear on TV, or seen Deaf actors appearing occasionally in TV dramas, but could they name one? I doubt it.
People who are famous or high profile get the chance to talk about things to a wide audience. On chat shows, in magazine interviews, or even on social media, where they can rack up thousands of followers.
The air space they’re given, just by being known, means they can share messages to a large number of people about the things that are important to them.
Without high profile people to represent and articulate our views, Deaf issues, and awareness of Deaf people and what they can do, can seem completely invisible.
This is what DiMarco seems to have intuitively understood from the start – that having a high profile and being visible means you can influence and change perceptions, both through being a positive Deaf role model, and through talking regularly about Deaf issues in the public domain.
From the start of his time on America’s Top Model, DiMarco sent out a positive message about Deaf people and about sign language, and that continued on Dancing with the Stars.
It’s clear that he saw the bigger picture of appearing on the show early on, telling Time magazine: “It was a chance for me to re-frame the Deaf community.”
As the show progressed and he did well, DiMarco was invited to the White House to meet President Obama.
As his plus one he could have taken a friend or relative along, but instead, decided to take along Gallaudet University’s President Roberta Cordano as his guest, making the very most of a rare opportunity for Deaf people to talk directly to power.
There’s also real substance behind what he’s doing. He’s set up a foundation with the aim of:
“improving access to accurate, research-based information about early language acquisition–specifically, the bilingual education approach. Through the early intervention process, the child’s language and literacy development should be the focal point.”
Deaf people often feel misunderstood, invisible from wider view, with the things we feel strongly about also unknown to the majority of people. The actions of one individual, as DiMarco has shown, can start to change that.
There’s now a ripple effect among young and old Deaf people who have followed DiMarco’s progress across the world, who are now feeling more positive about deafness, their identity, and what a Deaf person can achieve.
I’m interested to see what happens next with DiMarco. New doors will open for him having won two televised competitions in quick succession. No doubt he’ll continue his modelling career and there’s talk of trying to further his acting career too.
Whatever he decides to do in the public eye, it’s very likely he’ll continue to make Deaf issues more widely known, while acting as a role model for others to follow in his footsteps.
Which is a great thing.
Charlie is the editor of Limping Chicken, as well as being an award-winning filmmaker. He is currently making two new episodes of his documentary, Found, about Deaf identity. He previously wrote and directed the comedies The Kiss and Four Deaf Yorkshiremen go to Blackpool along with other film and TV credits. As a journalist, he has written for the Guardian and BBC Online.
Kerena Marchant
May 26, 2016
When he decided to leave his chosen career as a maths teacher, I was sad as what a teacher and role model he would have been to Deaf children. Now I’m delighted! May the glitter ball shine and end our darkness and stop hearing professionals talking without listening to the Deaf community over the decisions we make for our Deaf children.
Cathy
May 26, 2016
I have to admit I have never heard of this man and likewise I don’t think many other British deaf people have either!
I do not feel this is detrimental to our lives especially as he’s American anyway! We have our own deaf role models here in Britain although I am not sure how much influence they have had at grassroot level either in the deaf community or the hearing one.
The article states that it is a big problem having so few deaf people in the media or on TV. Why? I do not see it as “a big problem” at all. We are living exactly the same as the hearing world! In their world, hundreds of thousands have never been anywhere near the media or on Television: are hearing people complaining this is “a big problem” of course they aren’t! So, why are we calling this a “problem” just because we are a minority group?! I do not see this as a problem at all! It is all too easy to “see problems” where there are none.
I do recall a deaf actor who was on Coronation Street (the most famous soap in Britain). She was on twice, albeit very briefly, before they brought in the girl in the wheelchair. I did wonder why Alison’s stint was so brief!
Personally, I thought the reason for the briefness was the fact that deaf people have to use interpreters. This means two things: more expensive to hire Alison as an actress and it slows down proceedings. These soaps are fast moving and they can ill afford to be slowed down by 1 actress. At least that is my take on the issue. The girl in the wheelchair can obviously go at the same pace and speed as everyone else and she is not costing them double!! This unfortunately is a problem that deaf people will ALWAYS have and that is a problem we will NEVER solve!
Perhaps people can now understand why deaf people are not prominent in the media or in the spotlight on TV. We are far too expensive and too slow!!
There are many British deaf people getting on with their lives either in work or out of work, but I dont think it is good to see lack of deaf people in prominent positions “as a problem” itself. We are no more of “a problem” than hundreds of thousands of hearing people doing nothing very much are!
Editor
May 26, 2016
The reason it’s a problem Cathy, as the article states is that there’s no-one representing Deaf people in mainstream media.
Hearing people are represented by pretty much every person who appears on screen.
That’s the difference.
Charlie (Ed)
Cathy
May 26, 2016
I can understand your point, Charlie, but we do have See Hear, which has been on for donkeys years now, so if that does not form some kind of representation of deaf people, then not much else will. We had Switch, which fast disappeared and I quite enjoyed it! I remember the late Hal Draper telling the Deaf community to make complaints and a fuss then it will come back. I don’t think anybody bothered making complaints and so it never came back on our screens. We are easily dispensed with in the face of financial pressures and massive competition amongst the mainstream. It is exactly the same for blind people and those who are disabled in other ways. Who represents them in mainstream media? As far as I am aware: nobody.
Editor
May 26, 2016
We may be easily dispensed with, but that doesn’t make it right.
As for other disabilities, they ought to be represented too.
Thanks
Charlie
Monkey Magic
May 26, 2016
It’s great exposure for the Deaf community but I was disappointed to see that Nyle’s access to communication and his identity as a Deaf person was still marginalised in the show by the choice to place the interpreter to the far side of the judges, which meant Nyle didn’t get the same experience as his hearing co-stars. They were able to look directly at the judges, whilst he was forced to flick very quickly between the two and was then forced to react very quickly when he may not have had a chance to digest what was said. I’m not making this moan because I’m an interpreter (clearly it would have been good exposure for interpreters too) but because it was still considered that his access to communication would be in the way, or that aesthetically it would look messy on TV. In the real world interpreters are physically present next to the speaker and doing this on the show would help the world to see that the placement of the interpreter next to a speaker is necessary and normal.
Cathy
May 26, 2016
Monkey Magic: your little story reminds me of a show I wanted to watch about 5 years ago. It was the X Factor and myself and my daughter were looking forward to going to the show. I enquired about interpreters and they said they don’t have them. I asked if they would kindly book one so I can follow the show with my daughter. There were lots of phone calls between Social Worker and those running the show. They suggested sitting in the seat reserved for the disabled! I had to laugh as the person obviously had no Deaf awareness whatsoever! I realised I was hitting a brick wall!
I recall a letter they had sent me explaining why it was not feasible for there to be an interpreter on stage at the MEN arena. They said it was not possible for an interpreter to cope! It was not logistical or aesthetic etc etc. It was obviously all excuses. I was seriously annoyed and decided to sue. They soon developed cold feet and we came to an agreement to settle out of court.
I accepted settlement, not least because it is less stressful and the possibility was there that I could get less than the offer, in court. These people never think about the deaf community and how we are constantly marginalised in life. There really is no let up out there. Nor do I think this payout forced the MEN to accept interpreters, although, if we are lucky, they may do now.
Linda Richards
May 26, 2016
Great article Charlie and yes, will be fascinating to see how this develops.
pennybsl
May 26, 2016
Thanks Charlie, especially when ‘non-ASL’/ non-‘D’ writers are provoking our allies across the pond.
Lana
May 29, 2016
Nyle goes on being famous because he is handsome, smart, has a great body and personality