An article in the Guardian today explains how, although Hawaii Sign Language was ‘discovered’ (or identified) in 2013, it is also under severe threat both from the advance of American Sign Language (ASL) and from other threats to the Deaf community.
Extract:
In 2013, at a conference on endangered languages, a retired teacher named Linda Lambrecht announced the extraordinary discovery of a previously unknown language. Lambrecht – who is Chinese-Hawaiian, 71 years old, warm but no-nonsense – called it Hawaii Sign Language, or HSL. In front of a room full of linguists, she demonstrated that its core vocabulary – words such as “mother”, “pig” and “small” – was distinct from that of other sign languages.
The linguists were immediately convinced. William O’Grady, the chair of the linguistics department at the University of Hawaii, called it “the first time in 80 years that a new language has been discovered in the United States — and maybe the last time.” But the new language found 80 years ago was in remote Alaska, whereas HSL was hiding in plain sight in Honolulu, a metropolitan area of nearly a million people. It was the kind of discovery that made the world seem larger.
The last-minute arrival of recognition and support for HSL was a powerful, almost surreal vindication for Lambrecht, whose first language is HSL. For decades, it was stigmatised or ignored; now the language has acquired an agreed-upon name, an official “language code” from the International Organization for Standardization, the attention of linguists around the world, and a three-year grant from theEndangered Languages Documentation Programme at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London.
But just as linguists were substantiating its existence, HSL stood on the brink of extinction, remembered by just a handful of signers. Unless the language made a miraculous recovery, Lambrecht feared that her announcement might turn out to be HSL’s obituary.
Toby
August 10, 2016
But…but isn’t Hawaii a part of America?! 🙂
I can see a few examples that could be said the same for Scottish Sign Language.
The biggest mistake made by people in the past was to consider ‘Scotland’ as a region in terms of BSL signing variations.
Once it was called BSL in Edinburgh, the growth of sign language in Scotland become shunted perhaps because Durham University became the home of BSL?
When that happened, sign language grew much faster in England via universities and television, and now from the likes of BSL Zone.
That has result in the loss of Scottish signing unfortunately.
I consider Scottish Sign Language as my first language by the way.
It’s an interesting article, I think people should feel proud that sign languages around the world are becoming stronger, diversity in sign languages can only but boost the case that sign languages are unique all around the world just like spoken languages.