Right, you guys. I have been sitting on this one for a long time. So long, it’s practically welded to my bum. But I can’t ignore it any longer. The best we can hope for is to get through it without too many swears, and minimal loss of life.
What THE HELL is going on with baby sign classes?
No, seriously. I’m not even talking about the fact that any old random person can set themselves up as a ‘baby sign tutor’ and start relieving you of your money in return for waving their hands at your offspring and pretending it means ‘mamma’, when it actually means ‘toast’, ‘testicles’ or ‘what a wonderful and massive con this is’.
Those are their own special kind of nonsense. Forget them. Don’t give them your time, money or eyeballs. Move on.
Genuine baby sign classes, with knowledgeable tutors, whether based in BSL (which would always be my personal preference for ‘general’ signing classes, as it lays foundations to learn a whole new language) or Makaton (which is very useful as a non-verbal communication tool for learners with additional needs) – these are brilliant. My issue is not with the existence of these.
Well, only a little bit.
My outrage, which has built slowly over the last four years into just rage, is this – where are the classes for the deaf kids? Not just as babies, but for the whole of their young lives?
When a hearing family want their hearing baby to learn some sign language so that they can communicate earlier than their tiny speechless mouths would allow, it is seen as adorable. Forward-thinking. Progressive. Trendy, even. It is A Good And Proactive Thing Done By Good And Proactive Parents.
Great. Gold stars all round. No, really. Signing at an early age is proven to help development of all kinds of awesome and useful things like language, understanding, motor skills and relationships.
But why is this positive promotion of sign language reserved for the hearing? Forgive me if I’m mistaken, but isn’t the origin of sign language based in it being a visual form of communication for those who can’t hear spoken words? Namely, deaf people? And doesn’t this include deaf kids?
Because there is an awful, stark contrast to this adorable, hearing-babies-doing-signing and it is this; there is still no very little widespread support for d/Deaf children and young people to learn sign language. And yet the benefits to them are so much greater!
I’m not saying there’s zero support. But it’s few and far between, and very, very hard to find – especially if you are a hearing parent of a deaf child, negotiating this brave new world.
Whereas a generic baby sign class can be found in every town.
There’s probably even one on Mars, they’re so prolific at the moment.
And, yes, you could totally take a deaf child along. But then what? When they outgrow the baby signs, what options are there? You better get pretty good at Googling, and travelling, and fighting for opportunities…
From the other side of things, as a Deaf parent of a hearing child, I struggle to find any groups that my son can attend to help him with his signing. I don’t mean Deaf social clubs (which are also closing so fast that if you blink you miss them). I
mean places with structure and fun – places like baby sign, but for those who will be using the skills for the rest of their lives, not just until they can talk. Those who are often under pressure not to sign anyway, because it’s so often (wrongly) seen as lesser.
If signing as a baby is so socially acceptable and great, then why are we still campaigning to get BSL recognised at a level that means it could be a learned language option in school? As the quote goes, “Not everybody will go to France, but anybody can become deaf.”
It feels like the boom in baby signing popularity, which felt so hopeful at the start, is in danger of backfiring on us. It feels like it’s only acceptable while it benefits hearing people, while babies can’t speak. It feels like something to be dropped, once the better option of talking comes along.
And it isn’t. It’s so much more. It’s a lifeline, and it benefits everybody. So, why are we treating it like light entertainment? This is not soft play. It’s not tumble tots.
Emily Howlett is a regular writer for this site. She is a profoundly Deaf actress, writer and teacher. Emily is co-director of PAD Productions and makes an awful lot of tea. And mess. She now has not one, but four grey eyebrow hairs. C’est la vie. She tweets as @ehowlett
Ian Noon
February 21, 2017
The lack of support for families to help them communicate with their child is really depressing. In case it’s helpful, National Deaf Children’s Society has some information on their website about social care legislation and how this can be used to request further support to, for example, access sign language classes. It can be challenging to get support from local authorities in this area but knowing your rights will hopefully help.
http://www.ndcs.org.uk/family_support/positive_parenting_families/social_care.html
Linda Richards
February 21, 2017
Hello Ian,
I went to the NDCS website to check out these ‘rights’. It turns out I have to be a member of the NDCS before I can access this information.
Why?
Marika Rebicsek
February 21, 2017
Absolutely spot on and so glad she raised this issue – if babies learn to sign, must do it properly., Also I am not keen on makaton, why not use BSL or SSE and then people with learning difficulties can communicate with anyone including BSL interpreters? Signing classes should be free for everyone who has a hearing loss irrespective of age
Natalya
February 21, 2017
Appropriation innit.
They take ideas from sign language and marketised *shudder* it. It isn’t about grammar and language, it’s about shiny happy singalong with allegedly valid handwaving. If anything I think babysign undermines BSL because it implies it’s just signs for words without any recognition of the origin of sign language and need for deaf people.
No different to white folk stealing music and fashion from black people and passing it off as if it was our idea all along and often deriding black people’s work in this area.
Appropriation, it’s a thing, and it happens a lot. Not just to Deaf people.
Sybil Hull
February 21, 2017
Yes, yes, and so much more YES!
I have said this for so long! It is amazing that there are so many studies showing that sign is helpful in communication with pre-verbal babies, yet something about the Deaf brain makes AGBell people insist NO SIGNING in Deaf children of the same age? It simply makes no sense whatsoever.
It makes me quite angry when I think about it.
Mumpop
February 22, 2017
As an ex baby signing teacher of five years and now a teacher of adults with multi sensory impairments I would urge you not to ‘tar us all with the same brush’. The baby signing classes I taught were BSL and were fully inclusive to everybody. Families that attended were deaf, hearing, some babies had visual impairments, Down syndrome or other additional needs. Classes were designed to be fun for all, there was singing and dancing involved, yes. ‘Waving our hands around’ no! The classes provided an opportunity for parents and babies to build early communication skills using props, toys, pictures, songs and dance. Many hearing parents were inspired to learn BSL from attending the class. Is this a bad thing? I could go on but don’t want to rant. So I think I’ll stop there.
Elecktra13@gmail
February 22, 2017
Um. What am i missing here? What is prohibiting all children from attending these classes, hearing impaired or otherwise? This sounds more like a whine than a rant.
Linda Richards
February 22, 2017
It’s a franchise. From what I know and have seen of those delivering it, they are not native or fluent Sign Language users. They don’t have the ability to sign to Deaf parents or are delivering the signs correctly. No one from Deaf families should be paying for courses or setups like this in order to learn to communicate with their Deaf child/family member/neighbour. Look at all these painful signing choirs… but that’s another topic.
Mumpop
February 23, 2017
Elektra13, how is that a whine? I’m in agreement with you! There is nothing stopping anyone going to the classes if they are properly run and accessible. Linda, I am a fluent signer. I agree not all are and some baby signing classes give poor service, use mixed sign systems and do not use a multisensory approach and would not be useful for Deaf families. Families often attended my classes for free through surestart.
Lyn G
March 3, 2017
This article raises such an important point. From my experience many hearing parents whose children are diagnosed as “deaf”, irrespective of level of hearing loss, are told by healthcare professionals (namely doctors) not to teach their child to sign as speech will never develop. Obviously this is nonsense but the medical profession approaches deafness via a medical model as something to fix. They also seem to miss much of the research showing the importance of language in the development of social and emotional cognition, irrespective of hearing loss.
Totally agree Linda, no one who is learning to communicate with their family should have to pay to do so.
Helen
March 12, 2017
We have same problems here but we have set up our own classes because nothing is available here either which are free. We have parents of deaf children and deaf parents with hearing children allvcoming together to support each other. Babies and toddlers ( pre school ) are taught proper signs ( what’s the point of teaching them twice) . I am angry at Givernment for not intervening earlier , I am angry at the mefical profession for telling parents of Deaf children not to sign to their children because they won’t speak???? .
I am also angry that deaf clubs do not support those parents who want to learn to sign by visiting their social events how else can they practice ? it’s all madness
Lindsey
March 11, 2017
Hi Emily, thank you for writing such a great article. As a hearing Mamma to a hearing baby, with a deaf Daddy I completely agree with your article. We want to bring our little one up bilingually so that she can converse completely fluently with Daddy and all our D/deaf friends. I struggled to find one class (there are 8 in our area) that uses BSL so we had to just buy BSL books and resources and are teaching her ourself at home. But it is so frustrating that 1) they have an amazing opportunity to start so many children on the journey of speaking another language but choose instead to make up random signs and 2) there is no provision as you say for our friends children who were born deaf. How wonderful would it be if all children were taught BSL in nursery (ours is fully supporting us and signing to her while she is there) and primary school. They pick it up so quickly (our little on is 11 months, understands everything we sign and starting signing several signs back to us about a month ago). Anyhow i just wanted to show our support and thank you for bringing much needed attention to such an important issue!
Mark Smith
March 12, 2017
Baby sign classes are privately funded between the parents and the providers. The parents pay for them. A few are free but are led led by volunteers. Deaf people could do this for deaf children just as easily. I’m not sure why this doesn’t happen. Baby sign groups for hearing babies help our BSL cause a little bit by promoting and fostering the idea that sign language is a good thing, and countering the fear that signing will hinder children from learning to use English. We need this as this view though well evidenced is not yet widely accepted in the wider community. However what we really want is publicly funded sign language classes for Deaf children. We don’t want parents of deaf children to have to pay or use volunteers as for baby signing classes! And we want proper full communication not a nice sing along! Really “hearing baby signing classes” having nothing to do with that, except they may help soften up the hearing community by creating more allies who are sympathetic to sign language. However the people who run or use baby sign classes don’t get any outside support either, so aren’t taking anything from Deaf people, and in my experience they would all support rather than oppose classes for deaf children. Emily maybe you could get the ball rolling by starting a group for DEAF babies and preschool children to sign and learn to sign in your area ? I think it should be fee for deaf children & their hearing parents to learn sign, but many would chip in a notional contribution as they do for hearing baby sign classes, and its much better to do something like this for you own community that to attack and discourage those who are doing something for theirs..