By Jeff McWhinney, Chairman & Founder of SignVideo (a supporter of this site) and member of The Top 100 List Of The Most Influential Disabled People in the UK.
We see organisations in the UK trying to be accessible and consider their social responsibility with pride – and we salute them for trying. However for the Deaf community, it’s simply not enough.
Many hearing people don’t realise that for the 150,000 British Sign Language (BSL) users in the UK, text based services just do not work.
Organisations try to make their customer services helplines available to Deaf people through text relay, or email services but they don’t realise that these communication options are in fact putting up another barrier to Deaf BSL users – written English!!
British Sign Language is a language in its own right.
It is not a translation of English into sign – it has its own structure, flow, expression and physical elements and is quite different to English.
Unlike spoken languages, there is no written form of BSL. In spoken languages, the voice can convey a range of emotions. Deaf BSL users convey emotion and intonation through facial expression, which forms approximately 80% of British Sign Language.
BSL is, for the majority of Deaf people, the only language in which they can access information – from learning about current affairs on TV to finding support from councils and businesses.
So text relay and email doesn’t serve those Deaf BSL users who don’t speak or use English. What we need is helpline and in-branch customer services in our own language – just like Welsh speakers have.
Teresa Garratty, writing for Limping Chicken, summed it up nicely in her recent article saying:
“When we write/read we can’t see all those little signifiers that help shape the outcome of human interaction. There’s no body language to detect, no facial expressions to use as a guide. Is this person so at ease with you that they sit close enough to be touching? Or are they at the opposite side of the room with their arms folded tightly across their chest? You just don’t know, and it’s things like this that can cause a dramatic shift in reality. The conversation that you thought you were having, turns into something completely different and when you’re on the end where the wires are crossed…well, brace for impact.”
Text based services can cause confusion for Deaf people which in turn leads to frustration and feeling excluded from society. We need to make things easier for Deaf people not harder! Organisations must provide access to customer services for Deaf people in BSL. It needs to be in real-time, as and when the Deaf caller needs it – just like it is for hearing people.
I hope to see a future where BSL achieves legal status as a language in its own right and where all organisations provide BSL customer services for the Deaf community as standard.
Find out more about SignVideo here: http://www.signvideo.co.uk/
Cathy
May 24, 2017
This is interesting, not least because many Deaf children now have cochlear implants. One would expect that they have speech and access to sound, which means they have access to the English Language and therefore should be building up better reading and writing skills than past generations.
Even many of my generation have the CI but I can understand they would still be reliant on BSL as learning English late in life is very difficult.
The main point, however, is that less and less people would be relying on BSL as the generations move on, so this service that Jeff badly wants would be serving less and less people, isn’t that strange?
And last but not least, these cochlear implants cost £40,000 for one is that not a monumental waste of resources if Deaf people still cannot read and write when they have access to sound…….????
Mervyn James
May 24, 2017
I disagree with McWhinney his negative posts re text assistance is not welcomed by us defa or HoH. Perhaps he could also take to task his many BSL using vloggers wh oare refusing to provide text access to us as deaf people who do not sign too ? The BDA and their other areas are determined to keep deaf people in ignorance UNLESS they sign !
Anthony Mugabira (@AnthonyMugabira)
May 24, 2017
This is very important and gives many facts.
we started a campaign for a project to convert Audio to sign language for social and online videos! @indiegogo check it out. https://t.co/pgsAi40zuR
Njfabrizi
May 30, 2017
To Cathy
I am a CI user of 4 years. I was born deaf, and wore hearings for most of my life. I am also what you would call an ‘oral’ deaf person meaning that I lipread,I make the most of what I can hear through CI as well speaking.
CIs and hearing aids only give us an impression of sounds but it does not give full range of access to sounds. For example I could only pick up 5% of the words without speaking when I had my hearing aids. The rest of the sounds/speech were just mumbo jumbo. Although the CI has been a great help to me, I can only pick up about 51% of the words with out lipreading.
The Ci has several variables. There are no standard outcome. For example, I know of some one who had CIs done when she was a baby. I had my CI in my early 40s yet I have a better understanding of English as well better speech than she did. I hope this help you to understand how hearing aids/CIs do not give full access to speech.
Regards