Deaf children risk falling even further behind at school because of ballooning caseloads for specialist teachers, the National Deaf Children’s Society has warned.
New analysis from the charity shows that the caseloads of Teachers of the Deaf have risen by 36% in the last four years.
In 2013, Teachers of the Deaf were supporting 43 deaf children on average, rising to 49 in 2015. The latest annual survey of local authorities, carried out in 2017, shows that each Teacher of the Deaf is now supporting an average of 60 deaf children, with the charity predicting the situation is set to get worse.
During this time, one in ten Teachers of the Deaf have also been cut.
The figures come after a recent report revealed over a third of local councils plan to cut deaf children’s education budgets by a total of £4 million this year. Deaf children already fall a grade behind their hearing classmates at GCSE and the attainment gap is widening.
The National Deaf Children’s Society also says a recruitment crisis is looming in deaf children’s education.
Almost one in seven councils already say they have one Teacher of the Deaf for more than 100 pupils, while 45% report problems in recruiting Teachers of the Deaf or supply cover in the past year. More than half of those that are in post are over 50, meaning they are set to retire within 10-15 years.
The charity is calling on the Government to introduce a bursary fund to avert a recruitment crisis that would leave thousands of deaf children without crucial support.
The £3.5 million scheme would help train more than 400 new Teachers of the Deaf over a three-year period, which the charity says is the minimum number required to stem the tide of those expected to leave their roles.
Susan Daniels, Chief Executive of the National Deaf Children’s Society, said:
“These figures show a profession under threat and an education system under siege.
“Councils face unprecedented levels of demand on their special needs budgets and deaf children’s support is being cut at a rate of knots, but the Government keeps up its repeated claims of record investment in the system. The evidence we see on the ground shows this couldn’t be further than the truth.
“Almost all deaf children are born to hearing parents and they are often the only deaf pupil at their school, so the support Teachers of the Deaf provide to children, parents and teachers is absolutely crucial.
“A bursary is not the silver bullet, but it’s a crucial first step in stemming the tide of departures from the profession. It would provide a new generation of fully-trained teachers for an incredibly rewarding job that supports tens of thousands of deaf children each year.
“Deafness is not a learning disability and until there is no attainment gap between deaf and hearing children, the Government will still be failing in its duty of care. Intransigence is no longer an option. Children, their parents and their teachers need action, and they need it now.”
Case study: Andrew Joy lives in Bedford with his wife and three sons. Two of them (Benjamin, 2, and Sebastian, 5) have bilateral moderate hearing loss, as does he.
Bedford Borough Council’s Hearing Impairment Team are supposed to provide assessment, support and advice for people with a hearing impairment and their carers, but Andrew says they are very short-staffed, with just one part-time Teacher of the Deaf and a support worker. As a result, he feels neither of his younger sons are receiving the support they need.
“Benjamin gets seen once a term by the support worker and does not get any additional support other than regular and supportive visits from audiology. We were told that because my wife used to be a nursery nurse she knew how to support Ben and Seb.”
“Sebastian does not get much support in school. He has been issued with a radio aid, but the school have not been trained on its use.
“We have discovered that Sebastian is behind with his reading and this is a result of him struggling with his phonics. The school should have had guidance on teaching phonics to deaf children which were emailed to them, but the file was too large so they never received it. No one thought to check up.”
Andrew says he is arguing with the school every week to get Sebastian the support he needs. He has also met with the Council, but progress has been slow.
“Having spoken to other families, it seems that everyone is in the same situation in Bedford with little or no support. I have spoken to the Head of Children’s services and they acknowledge they are short-staffed and have been trying to recruit more Teachers of the Deaf. I also feel that this is also down to funding cuts within the services.
Andrew says he never had any support for his own deafness at school and he fears for the future education of his sons.
“The early years are so important. We have had three meetings with the school and two with the council. Although things have improved, I have said I will see how the next half term goes and will pull both my boys out of the school if they can’t support Sebastian as I feel he should be.”
Emma Fraser has worked as a specialist Teacher of the Deaf for the last 10 years. She said:
“Teachers of the Deaf play a vital role in the lives of deaf children and their families, from diagnosis right through their whole education.
“They work with deaf children to ensure they can develop language and communication right from the earliest stages of their life, supporting them and their families at every turn. They also provide advice and training for schools to ensure every deaf child gets the right support in class so they can reach their full potential.
“Such a massive increase in Teacher of the Deaf caseloads is incredibly worrying. If a Teacher of the Deaf has 60 children to support, it will become impossible for them to provide the personalised support that deaf children and their families rely on.
“Deaf children already have to overcome obstacles every day. Without enough one-to-one support from Teachers of the Deaf, they face a long, uphill battle just to keep pace with their hearing peers.”
Mike Fahey
November 8, 2018
And yet we continue to close our schools for the deaf. I know not everyone is the same, but I went from 40 plus kids to 12 maximum kids per lesson when I transferred from mainstream school to deaf school. The difference is unbelievable.
Hartmut Teuber
November 8, 2018
What is wrong with the word “deafness”? Deaf children and adults do not have hearing loss. You cannot claim hearing loss if you were born deaf and never searched for the “lost” hearing.
How many of the teachers can use BSL well or sufficiently to transmit information to deaf children? That is a more relevant question to go after.
The article also says that the placement of deaf children in mainstreamed situations are economically not sound and more costly if their education is to be done more satisfactorily.
Tim
November 8, 2018
Right on, Hartmut.
pennybsl
November 8, 2018
Schools are using more CSWs and TAs to support deaf pupils instead of ToDs – saving money – but this robs the children quality learning and support. Quality comes before quantity, to safeguard deaf youngsters’ wellbeing and potential to progress after school.
Another concern, more (hearing) children are entering secondary education with lower than required literacy, numeracy and study skills. Some school grab ToDs from deaf children’s support so work with them, diluting their specialist roles.
Whilst the UK needs more ToDs, there is also an urgent need for other Deaf Education personnel to be recognised, trained and employed – especially Deaf teachers (most have PGCEs) working as learning support, Deaf instructors and BSL – we Deaf staff are also vital role models for the school, parents/carers and the students themselves.
Deaf youngsters benefit much from seeing efficient, competent teamwork between Deaf & hearing staff in Deaf Education provision, demonstrating efficient positive specialist education towards society, mainstream schooling, local authorities and more in today’s education challenges.
Tim
November 8, 2018
Until people learn to stop voting Conservative, it’ll be the same old story.
The Tories only care about a tiny little group of very rich people. Until voters get this, we can’t move ahead.
Whenever you’re ready.
LipreadingMom
November 18, 2018
I am an early childhood special education teacher in the U.S. and work with children who are Deaf or hard of hearing, as well as having other delays and disabilities. One of the things I see is that young children who come through early childhood special education screenings may not have “enough” hearing loss to qualify for our program. This is very concerning, as I know that any amount of hearing loss or deafness can impact a child’s ability to develop speech, learn phonics, and become fluent readers as their typically developing peers. Why limit early intervention to those children who are only deemed as having “enough” hearing loss?