In this blog I am wanting to share my thoughts about the challenge in reaching Deaf people with a message or a call to action. Hopefully this post will lead us all to share ideas.
To watch Tyron signing his blog, click play below, or scroll down to continue in English!
Long gone are the old days, sometimes seen as “golden”, where we all eagerly waited for a monthly magazine to reach our homes with news from the Deaf sphere (e.g. British Deaf News, One in Seven, Talk and others), or for the old teletext magazines, No Need to Shout (BBC) and DeafView (C4) which were refreshed every week.
Or when we frequented our regional or local deaf club on a weekly or monthly basis to socialise primarily, but also to find out about stuff.
Or where we would wake up early on Sundays to catch that lovely BBC programme, See Hear (not forgetting other series such as Sign on). There was also a tri-monthly magazine from the World Federation of the Deaf, I’m not too sure what’s happened with that recently.
Older generations in the UK will remember Deaf events and campaigns attended in mass numbers, be it the annual British Deaf Association conference, FYD Sports Festivals, A.F. Dimmock’s well known tours, deaf ramble groups etc. The success of these were more or less achieved via physical methods; letters, adverts in magazines etc.
We didn’t really have the internet at our hands in those days.
Over the past two (or is it three?) decades there has been the huge development and growth of:
– E-newsletters
– Yahoo e-groups (special mention of Deaf-UK-jobs which reached 20yrs last week with more than 20k jobs advertised, Alison Bryan the moderator did all of this voluntarily, and deserves a medal)
– Facebook, Facebook groups
– Instagram feeds and Instagram stories
– Twitter, Twitter chains
– YouTube
– Linked In
– Websites
– Blogs, especially Limping Chicken!
And there are probably other things that I have yet to discover! There is also a wider ability to send out information with the click of a button to a range of social media channels rather than having to do everything several times.
There’s also the ability of audiences to control what they see, e.g. blocking people/organisations, hiding those who post out too much information, things we don’t agree with or rubbish, or we can quieten particular people for 30 days.
There’s GDPR which audiences can use to stop companies sending messages or holding their data. I tried it with the Guardian Online the other day, couldn’t believe the number of data fields I had to physically opt out from if I wanted to control what data was being kept!
But the question of: “If it’s all digitally easy to send information out etc, then why is it so difficult to get action, to get big turn outs compared to the old days?” keeps coming to mind.
The Deaf sphere of course, as we all know has changed. But the ability to send out information to Deaf people surely is so much easier than the days of post and stamps?
Is it that the call to action is difficult?
Is it that we are overloaded in a crowded sector where all players in the field are vying for your attention? At the time of writing this blog there are approximately more than 75 deaf organisations in the UK, as well as schools and groups who will send out tweets or posts more than once a week.
Is it that we are measuring the wrong thing as success? For example, the number of likes a post gets? The number of retweets? Do they really result in any change? How do we know?
Is it that we are confused between what is self-promotion and what is useful information?
Is it that we are tired of “cryptic” messages? For example “@Mr Joe Bloggs it was wonderful to meet you, look forward to working with you in future” – does this put people off or does it make them interested?
These questions play in my mind every time I read something or every time I see something posted in the Deaf sphere.
The more or less recent growth of live-streaming has been positive in many senses, especially to promote but also to gauge interest in audiences, for example London Deaf Drama Group.
For some events, it raises the question of why bother going to events so far away when you can just watch from your screen and save so much money and time. Indeed!
At Deaf LGBTIQA where I am the acting chair of this small voluntary group, we have recently done a video and text about the importance of Cervical Cancer Screening. A tweet and facebook did not result in immediate active sharing/retweeting but I soon learned that you had to write the post in a particular way to get other twitter handles to take action. Also that sending out something on a Tuesday afternoon is not the best time to trigger action – hmm!
Stop Press – Hurray! Cervical Screening Twitter handle, @CervicalScreen1 has just retweeted the tweet from Deaf LGBTIQA, it feels like an achievement because it is going to a mass audience (more than 8000 at time of writing) who follow them, compared to our current immediate following (286 at time of writing).
And SignHealth has also retweeted to their followers (7445 at time of writing). But then again perhaps we should not leave it at that? Surely the best measure should be how many deaf women actually have a cervical cancer smear test?
A few weeks ago a group of buddies and I were concerned about more and more news about deaf men not coping with mental health.
We created a video which was then edited and then I added captions on. It was agreed to share it at 12noon on a Friday, and reached more than 2000 views by the Monday morning.
I think the topic was the key factor, but also the video featured 6 friends who each have their circle of friends. But that’s just my opinion. However statistics tell us there are over 70,000 BSL users in the UK. Even accounting for those couples or families who view posts together, its nowhere near the total. How do we know we have reached the Deaf sphere?
Social media can cause anxiety for some people for sure, and we know a lot has been researched/written about this although not specifically with Deaf people.
I met so many Deaf people whilst travelling in Latin America who were worried they could not afford to go to Paris, where the WFD Congress 2019 takes place. So many posts appear on their feeds from the wider Deaf International sphere, which makes it sound like everyone is going. Most people from Latin America just cannot afford to go. They seemed really concerned that they would miss out by not be able to go.
There are other examples of how social media affects people, e.g. self-image, posing, boasting, comparative statements etc, but there isn’t enough space in this post to go into that.
This brings us to a recent pattern emerging; people leaving social media or disengaging. People who are just tired of so many posts and not able to keep up. People who may feel inadequate from seeing positivity and negativity in others’ posts. People exasperated with what others say. Also those who value their own privacy greatly. The reasons vary greatly.
When I was travelling and did a blog or a Facebook update I would also email directly to friends who I knew had left social media. It was an additional errand but important to do so and I know they appreciated it. I have to be mindful that not everyone who follows/is a friend will see everything I post; social media can be weird in that sense that you will miss an update here and there.
It isn’t just digital though. I strongly remember back in 2008 at one meeting in the North Region I was giving a presentation to the British Association of Teachers of the Deaf in relation to my job at the time. I had previously written an article in their national magazine. I quickly realised they hadn’t read it – I asked for a show of hands as to who had read my article before my presentation and none were raised; not everyone has the time or eagerness to read and digest a magazine front to back.
There are physical opportunities to reach people in the Deaf sector, especially Deaf conferences and the infamous City Lit Deaf Day in London. Yet often the challenge is there to decide how best to reach audiences as not everyone can go to a conference/event, not everyone is on Facebook, and not everyone reads a magazine back to front. Cost is also a factor – not in terms of money but also time.
Whilst I travelled, the internet and social media brought a lot of sanity for me, I could keep in touch, I could write blogs and share them. I could engage with friends and family. I could also get a sense of what was happening in the UK (Brexit, what else!). However I made a conscious decision to not get hung up on how many likes or shares a blog or posting got. This was important to do.
For those of you who may not know, posts can be accompanied by hashtags (#). But to be “on top of it” you ought to be searching the hashtag you are interested in. Do you?
Last night I talked about this developing blog post with a few good friends. The conversation led to the hashtag “#deaf”. It is common for us all to scroll and catch up with our personal accounts on social media – almost daily for some of us, but do we search #deaf? And do we do this regularly? Since it was launched, Instagram has had over 675,000 posts with #deaf – how many of these have you seen? Twitter has had over 130 posts today, and it’s only 9.15am at the time of writing this!
There seems to be a problem though – not everyone uses a hashtag appropriately. And no-one owns a hashtag. A quick skim through the past 500 #deaf posts has show a lot of unwanted posts where individuals just want some attention for example.
Are you someone who is trying to use digital media to achieve or change something? Do you find it challenging? Do you have any good tips? I would value you sharing any tips.
In the meantime maybe set yourself a challenge, to search for #deaf (or whatever hashtag you particularly like) a few times a week?
Tyron is in his early 40s and loves a good laugh and cuddle with friends and family. He has worked for over 20 years with deaf young people. In between volunteering and loads of networking, he is keeping an eye out for his next career move since travelling. Follow him on Twitter as @tyronwoolfe
Penelope Beschizza
April 25, 2019
Excellently put. It’s very relevant nowadays for health, social & emotional well-being.
Also vital for looking ahead – how do we bring together the increasing fragmentation / scattering of young deaf people to find their peer support and communication ease?
Thanks, Tyron. 👌🏾
Bob B Bobberson
April 26, 2019
Great blog! Here are my thoughts regarding the information distributor side of matters: there’s an oversaturation of service providers and the lack of cooperation between them. Is such cooperation even possible especially when some are hearing-led pursuing the “charitable business model” of mass applying to funding bodies and the subsequent hiring of deaf people for unstable, temporary jobs which end with the funding? Deaf-led organisations are guilty of this too. It is difficult to criticise them especially when they get the funding and thus become an essential service provider for some deaf people, however temporary and geographically limited their tenure may be?
The average deaf person now needs to like and follow 50+ pages to get a good chunk of engagement with the myriad bunch of organisations. I think this isn’t natural. The average person could be loyal and knowledgeable about two or three organisations, so this may be creating a further fracturing effect where certain social groups are associated with certain organisations.
We have an extra 30-40 other deaf charities with seemingly randomly generated names jostling for funding where they all apply for every possible avenue of funding, even in areas which aren’t their expertise, just so they’ve got something to do and thus their existences are justified. Who has the heart to tell them that they aren’t helping and should shut down?
Perhaps I’m talking about an inaccurate fantasy, but wasn’t there a time when the RAD focused on local services which are not provided by the local or regional deaf association whilst the BDA focused on the overarching national political campaign? As in, their roles were clear, with minimal overlapping and nothing like the current competitive patchwork over the opportunities of becoming the “chosen” service provider for as many services and as many acres possible in the UK?
Basically, anyone who wants to signpost will have to update their signposts far more frequently as the landscape changes faster and more frequently than in the past. Is this rapid change a sign of progress in terms of accessibility or just instability disguised as progress?
In light of this chaos, of being bombarded with information constantly, we need an information aggregator, but I fear that it is an unprofitable avenue and that the information aggregator will just become the “51st page” of required following for the conscientious deaf person.
tyronstravels
April 27, 2019
Absolutely brilliant points altho somewhat nirvana. Thanks for contributing your thoughts. Hmm who would be the ideal aggregator!?
oh dear
April 27, 2019
2 days and only 2 replies. That tells you everything you need to know Tyron.
“We have an extra 30-40 other deaf charities with seemingly randomly generated names jostling for funding where they all apply for every possible avenue of funding, even in areas which aren’t their expertise, just so they’ve got something to do and thus their existences are justified. Who has the heart to tell them that they aren’t helping and should shut down?”
Funding – where does the money come from?
New charities are created by people needing to feel important and pretend they are of chief executive/director level of intellect/ability, when in reality they are nothing more than supervisor/administrator in large companies. Hearing people still have an insane need to think they are somewhat superior and us deafies need them. There is a need to debate how many deaf organisations do we need?
Tyron. Social media is useless. Twitter is for short messages not debates. Facebook, etc, are moderated by moderators who will ban anyone more intelligent than themselves, ego and pride. What deaf people need is a single forum where topic of specific debate can be debated openly, unrestricted and unmoderated in the same way as meeting in deaf clubs. Limping chicken doesn’t cut the mustard. Setup a forum and use social media to link to the forum. Short preview of upcoming debate on here, again linking to the forum. A forum where there is no data mining, flexible enough to do the job and prevent spammers. Deaf people don’t want to open millions of accounts and spend insane amount of time chasing various social media platform. Until then, the deaf community will remain fractured as usual and will worsen over time.
tyronstravels
April 29, 2019
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I don’t seem to see a solution or evidence of what has worked though yet, no one has shown any evidence. I have received many direct messages on my own social media from people who have read and totally understood the points, but no one has actually said “but here is what does work” which worries me!
Bob B Bobberson
April 27, 2019
Anyhow, on the demand side of things, it is a lot more broad than just deaf people becoming lethargic by overstimulation. This “overstimulation” does not only come from deaf charities and such, but mainly from multinational corporations. These corporations have well-funded social media teams who, armed with everyone’s online information, are able to target their specific weaknesses. With this steroid-infused propaganda, it becomes more difficult for the casual deaf person to become casually engaged in the deaf movement.
Luckily, it is often the case that deaf people actively seek the opportunity to engage with other people like themselves, but how much and how often do we need it, especially when we have almost every other imaginable avenue of entertainment at our fingertips? Perhaps for some, facetime fully satisfies that need and you would be lucky to see them at a social event once a year.
With this, we have seen the rise of people living their lives online. Instead of having this discussion at the deaf club, we are having it on Facebook. As more and more people satisfy themselves online, they engage less with the real world, and this trend has so much momentum and funding behind it that any illusion of self-determination as a group in this respect is easily dismissed with the recent establishment of the deaf Netflix group. We’re just a wee tiny minority, a mere leaf fluttering in the wind. Perhaps it is time to consider real-life awareness workshops for everyone, NOT just “the youth”.
I think it is also important to consider the current trend in identity politics where politicians and the public are being increasingly concerned with abstract notions and ignoring real problems in society. Identity politics is atomising society. We are seeing intersectionality being applied to the deaf community, with people feeling that it’s now more important to raise awareness about wider social issues, such as gender and race, within the deaf community, rather than the boring old thing of raising deaf awareness in the wider hearing community. As a society, as a community and as individuals, we have become more inward-looking and therefore our influence on the external world suffers.
This is just my opinion, I believe this is a “divide and conquer” effect being bankrolled and promoted by multinational corporations who are simply breaking down unprofitable concepts of culture and tradition so there are less barriers to their efforts to completely commercialise culture and identity. They mean to create “cattle” who cannot define their identity other than brandishing what they have bought.
In response to this, we must mobilise and protect the “deaf ecosystem” by voting with our wallets. For example, there’s the hearing-led fraudsters selling “I <3 ASL" merchandise who are still profiting off deaf people thanks to the continued lack of awareness in the deaf community about their actions. For the deaf ecosystem to grow, we need to create, package and sell a "deaf lifestyle" just as the multinationals' advertising strategies shift away from selling the product towards selling the lifestyle attached to their products.
Ted Evans
May 4, 2019
I find this article very interesting and whilst I appreciate there may be an issue of distrubtion and people having to filter through various sources online, I find the difficulty to reach the community extends to media. We get very low views with the films/TV programmes we create and I often wonder why this is.
On the one hand, if there are 70,000+ BSL users in the UK, then why aren’t they watching content produced specifically for them? It could be the programmes/films we produce is failing to attract people away from the abdundance of content at their disposal (platforms like Netflix, Amazon & Youtube).
Or it could also be that the statistics (that figure of 70,000+) is flawed?
I look to America, where supposedly 3 Million deaf and hard of hearing people reside, yet there is practially no niche market in film or TV? They don’t have the equivelent to the BSLBT for example. There is DPANTV but check their viewing figures, they certainly aren’t reaching 3 Million. Why is that? Why isn’t there a market in America if there is a potentially high volume of viewers?
One must also factor in the demographics of our audience, which isn’t just made up of deaf people but also family members, partners/friends, interpreters, BSL students and occasionally, people not affiliated to the deaf community at all.
So the fact the numbers are very low, despite this widened audience demographic, makes me contemplate why we aren’t doing better and reaching higher viewers? Where are the ‘70,000+’ and what are they watching at home? It’s important we ask those questions if we are to deliver good content.
Whilst digital media may, or may not, be a factor in reaching deaf people, I think the actual size of the community and the ‘identities’ deaf & HoH people adopt these days (along with their needs/interests), will also play a huge factor in why we aren’t reaching numbers we’d expect. The deaf community is changing faster than ever before, for many reasons I won’t go into here, but it is worth thinking about…
Could the problem not be with the access to the information but the needs/requirements of deaf people?
I try to look at the numbers & statistics whenever I can. I’m no longer on Facebook, but check how many members/followers do the deaf organisations have on FB/Twitter? The media programmes/outlets? I think you’ll find they don’t add up to the 70,000+ (or 150,000 if you take the statistic from the BDA website).
Whilst I respect not everyone will be online, that number is drastically reducing generation after generation and it will be much easier to collate data in future. Maybe then we will know the true statistics, and thus the size, of the deaf community?
However, I think we could probably find the answers on why we aren’t reaching deaf people today if there was a drive to find out more about our audience/community; to collect data and perhaps shake off the old traditional and cultural assumptions on what deaf people are actually like and what they want. All you would need is a research team with an ‘open-mind’ and comprehensive outreach strategy (both off and online).
The question then is: What would we do with that data? Would we adapt? Devide into smaller fractions of sub-community groups?
It would be interesting to know but we are going to find out sooner or later. The future will be revealed to us and history will offer an explaination.