- New report reveals 46% of deaf students who need support at university were still waiting for it when their course began.
- Of those, over half waited more than two months for it to be put in place.
- Deaf student Habiba Bernier: “I was turning up to lectures half-understanding what was being said, which made me feel I didn’t belong there.”
- The National Deaf Children’s Society has called on the Government and universities to “stop resting on their laurels and start delivering for deaf students.”
- The report is based on 134 deaf students’ experiences at university.
Almost half of deaf students who need support at university are still waiting for it when their course begins, a new report suggests.
The figures, published as part of a research project by the National Deaf Children’s Society, show that 46% of deaf university students who get additional support said they did not receive it in time for the start of their course.
Of those, more than half (59%) experienced delays of more than two months and over a quarter (28%) waited six months or more.
Support for deaf students varies depending on an individual’s needs, but it can include a notetaker, specialist tutor or British Sign Language Interpreter. Technology might include a radio aid or streamer, which transmit a lecturer’s voice to the deaf student’s hearing aids or cochlear implant.
The report also revealed problems with the support itself. Just over half of the students (53%) said their support was always available, while one in six (16%) said it rarely or never was. More than half (51%) also said that they didn’t receive enough information about the support or equipment they could access.
In response, the National Deaf Children’s Society said universities and the Government needed to step up and investigate the delays immediately, whilst ensuring that all potential deaf students received information and advice on the support available to them.
The charity has also raised fears that changes made in 2016 to the Disabled Students’ Allowance, a Government-funded grant for disabled students to cover their support costs, is compounding the problem.
The changes included new conditions and compulsory fees for freelance support workers, which the charity says had led to a shortage of people working in the profession. The charity is urging the Government to subside training to attract new support workers and says this is vital to meet the needs of deaf students.
Martin McLean, Policy Advisor at the National Deaf Children’s Society, said:
“It’s disgraceful to see that almost half of deaf students who need support do not get it in time. Universities and the Government urgently need to sort out this appalling situation, stop resting on their laurels and start delivering for every deaf student.
“This has to start with immediately investigating these delays and ensuring that information is widely available for all deaf students. If the Government also introduced subsidised training to boost the number of specialist support workers, deaf students could then spend their time focusing on their studies instead of worrying about whether their support will even arrive.
“Deaf students are just as capable as their hearing peers, but currently they are being held back during one of the most important periods of their lives. This cannot continue.”
Case study
Habiba Bernier is severely to profoundly deaf. She is from London and currently attends the University of Essex in Colchester.
In her first year, Habiba was allocated a specialist notetaker, but because travel costs weren’t covered and notetakers found it easier to get work in London, the university couldn’t find one for her entire first year.
“I felt let down and slightly lost. I was turning up to lectures half-understanding what was being said, which made me feel I didn’t belong there.
“I had no lecture notes to revise from and was relying on vague PowerPoint presentations and the textbook, which according to my lecturers has ‘too much information’, but I did my best.
“I was going to change universities to be based in London where there was more of a guarantee I would have a specialist notetaker. It was only then that my university stepped up and found a notetaker for me if I was to change my course.
“Though it wasn’t a specialist, it’s been very effective. I was gobsmacked by how much I had missed in lectures.”
Habiba says that if students aren’t getting the support they need, they should tell the university directly.
“Get in touch with the disability office at the university and make it known what the problem is and be clear about what’s needed.
“They can help email all your lecturers to ensure they know there is a deaf student without support. Some even go out of their way to provide more support, like additional notes on lectures and such.”
“Education providers need to publish and advertise notetaking jobs to fellow students in the university as it’s an easy way to earn money and can increase awareness for those who might not have met a deaf person before.”
Anon
June 11, 2019
It’s a complicated clusterfuck of government rules and university disability teams getting more and more work loaded on to them because of those changes. DSA is not fast, and the new NMH framework BS means the universities don’t even choose the supplier – DSA does…
It was hard enough as a disability adviser pre-2016 finding terps who could handle uni level material, sign appropriately for the student’s needs AND who could do regular work within the funding. But at least within a basic price range it was possible to find ‘any’ interpreter, so you could keep going back, trying again, trying a different agency if needed.
Now, you can’t, the DSA-QAG registration system means Agency X is listed as approved supplier at price Y and changing that requires the student to jump a load of hoops and wait ages while “attempts are made to improve” even when it’s obvious that isn’t happening. A lot of good agencies have pulled out cos the QAG registration is hideous, it wastes loads of time, costs loads of money, has no guarantee of work and QAG don’t even stick to their own side of the deal by meeting deadlines or communicating properly (arrogant, spiteful and incompetent – a bad combo).
I am not sure I approve of the advertising notetaking jobs to fellow students idea suggested in the case study, that has its own problems with quality and privacy issues – there isn’t a quick fix to the underlying crappy framework and DSA issues. If anything it’s made a bigger separation between universities and DSA where its harder than ever to cooperate to meet a student’s needs “cos of rules”.
STTR is even worse, the funding for that is about 50% of the actual cost, it’s the only role where DfE’s attitude is “universities should pick up the excess” on top of the DSA cap which is too low for deaf students anyway.
It’s not that DfE and formerly BIS weren’t told, it’s that they chose not to listen…
Graham Johnston
June 17, 2019
I am not among 134 deaf students they have researched, but this is partly reason why I had left the course in February. I had to wait for my maintenance loan until beginning of 2nd term as well as DSA. However I did get help while waiting for DSA though. The interpreters aren’t perfect and on few occasions I did not have any interpreters due to staff illness/hospital for important lecturer classes (no back up plans)! I did not have a note taker until 7th week. I started to lose interests in my course and therefore had left the course. It is not the point because the SFE/DSA did not know that I had the help while waiting to receive my DSA. They should’ve done their priority and be in time before starting of the course.