A deaf man from London has used lipreading and courtroom stenographers to serve as a juror in a crown court trial in England and Wales.
Matthew Johnson, a cochlear implant user, became a juror after officials and the judge were convinced of his ability to do so without hindrance.
Speaking to The Guardian, Mr Johnson said he feels “great that I can be one of a jury”.
“It’s all about inclusivity, isn’t it? It’s a big thing for me.
“We don’t want to turn our backs to society, we want to be part of society. We want to feel included,” he said.
At present, deaf jurors who would require British Sign Language (BSL) interpreters in order to serve have been excused from jury service, with common law prohibiting a “13th person” or “stranger” from entering the jury deliberation room.
In 1999, a request by a BSL user to reconsider them being automatically excused from jury service was rejected, with the judge saying allowing an interpreter into the jury room would amount to an “incurable irregularity”.
In a statement to the Guardian newspaper, a Ministry of Justice spokesperson said “every effort is made” to ensure those with hearing loss can serve on juries.
“We are harnessing technology like hearing loops and computer-aided transcription services to improve accessibility even further,” they said.
By Liam O’Dell. Liam is a mildly deaf freelance journalist and blogger from Bedfordshire. He wears bilateral hearing aids and can be found talking about disability, theatre, politics and more on Twitter and on his website.
Update: This article has since been corrected following reports that other profoundly deaf people have previously served as jurors.
Claire Hill
August 30, 2019
Thanks Liam – can I just clarify the use of “courtroom stenographers”? Matthew would have been provided with NRCPD-registered speech-to-text reporters (can be stenographers or palantypists) for the time the jury was in the courtroom, this is a special service, booked and paid for by the court, that is usually provided for a deaf defendant or deaf witness. There are no stenographers provided in criminal courts these days – the proceedings are recorded centrally and transcribed by a typist if required.
I just would like it to be clear that (a) there aren’t hundreds of stenographers in courts across the land and (b) a stenographer trained to produce court transcripts could not provide speech-to-text support without extra training and certification. Thanks!
Christopher Anthony Bradley
September 2, 2019
Wasn’t thete a deaf woman who wrote in July that she was doing jury duty with BSL interpretation?