At the 22nd edition of the Summer Deaflympics, in sports ranging from athletics to football and tennis, there were triumphs, hard luck stories and controversy to match anything from London 2012. Just to get there, Britain’s deaf athletes had to display unbelievable levels of dedication, not only in their training for the games, but also, in many cases, raising their own funds so they could compete.
Back in 2008, with the Olympics and Paralympics on the horizon, the government withdrew the annual funding they used to give to UK Deaf Sport, putting the Great Britain Deaflympic team’s participation in the 2009 Taipei Deaflympics in jeopardy. The sum? A measly £42,000.
That lack of funding pales in comparison to the record £347m funding UK Sport made available for Olympic and Paralympic sport following London 2012, with the Paralympic programme receiving an increase of 59% in funding overall.
In mitigation, last year, Sport England gave over £125,000 towards the team’s preparations for the Sofia games, but this was nowhere near enough. Indeed, the Great Britain Women’s Football team, who came fourth in 2009, still had to raise £50,000 to go to Sofia.
Despite those challenges, on Saturday – in scorching hot conditions – the team endured extra time and a nail-biting penalty shoot-out against Poland to win a richly deserved bronze medal.
Deaf people have been following the games through the BSL Zone site (which I also edit) with its daily video highlights, and news direct from Sofia. But the match wasn’t broadcast on TV, covered in national news bulletins or on mainstream websites or newspapers. Which is a crying shame, because if you’re looking for an inspirational sporting story, than this one had everything.
The team battled against injuries throughout the tournament, winning their crucial last group game without their inspirational captain Damaris Cooke, then losing three key players to injury in the first half of their devastating 5-0 semi-final defeat to the eventual winners, the USA.
They were down and out. But then, Rocky-style, they came back. When the winning penalty was scored against Poland, Louise Hogan scoring with a stunningly cool bottom-corner finish, their coach Mark Gill was captured on film wiping away tears (see 6 mins15 secs here).
Coverage of sport is all about narratives and there were so many to follow at these games.
You could look at medals, such as the silver for Lauren Peffers in the 400m, or the bronze for Melanie Jewett in the marathon, but for an athlete who won nothing except a great deal of respect, you could tell the story of tennis player Catherine Fletcher’s brave efforts to play through the pain of a shoulder injury (she could only serve underarm by the end of the games) only to finish fourth in the singles, doubles and mixed doubles.
For controversy, you could look at David Grant’s bizarre disqualification in the karate, where, among the reasons cited were the fact he didn’t have all the equipment he needed, nor a coach with him at the games (that lack of funding again).
If you want a story about a retiring legend, then you can tell the story of deaf sport’s equivalent of Sir Steven Redgrave, the five-time gold meal winning badminton player Rajeev Bagga, who finally bowed out at these games with a speech on the court. Sir Rajeev Bagga has a certain ring to it, I think, but I’m not holding out hope.
So why haven’t we heard these stories? There’s no doubt that Britain’s deaf athletes suffer not only from the chronic lack of funding but also from the lower profile of the Deaflympics.
I argued after last summer’s games that the Paralympics were a missed opportunity for deaf athletes, but we’ve just seen another missed opportunity in the lack of coverage in mainstream media for these Deaflympics.
Just as the Paralympics helped the public to see disabled athletes very differently, the Deaflympics were a chance for the world to find out what these deaf athletes can achieve, and more than that, about their backgrounds and their lives, the way they communicate (through sign language, lipreading, or both) and the barriers they have overcome in order to do the very best they can in their respective sports.
The cyclist Tom Smith, who won both silver and bronze in Sofia, hinted at what has driven this GB squad on in his final blog from Sofia: “The guys and girls of Team GB are the reason this trip has been a great one. The way we all gelled together, the lessons we’ve all given one another, the camaraderie; it made me feel proud and honoured to be flag bearer at the closing ceremony last night.”
I’d have loved to have seen Clare Balding meeting some of these amazing individuals in the British team – with a sign language interpreter at her side, perhaps – to bring their stories to the masses. Because to me, to succeed despite being underfunded – and lacking access to the best facilities as a result – was truly inspirational.
That’s why Britain’s deaf athletes should be given a hero’s welcome when they arrive back home – instead of being greeted with silence.
Charlie Swinbourne is the editor of Limping Chicken, as well as being a journalist and award-winning scriptwriter. He writes for the Guardian and BBC Online, and as a scriptwriter, penned the films My Song, Coming Out and Four Deaf Yorkshiremen.
The Limping Chicken is the UK’s independent deaf news and blogs website, posting the very latest in deaf opinion, commentary and news, every weekday! Don’t forget to follow the site onTwitter and Facebook, and check out our supporters here.
Smarty
August 5, 2013
I guess there are a couple of factors to the lack of mainstream coverage of the games:
1. Deafness is not seen as a physical disability. There is no reason for deaf athletes not to be able to compete in the Olympic games provided their access needs are met.
2. The Deaf community are a pretty small sub section of the population. Their sporting achievements are hardly likely to be of great interest to the general population.
I don’t think we should be too downbeat about the lack of coverage – we have to remember there are many other sporting events that don’t get a lot of press too. For example, the junior sporting championships are not featured much or many women’s events.
I know there are big barriers in terms of accessing training which prevents deaf athletes from reaching the top tier of their sports i.e. being able to compete with hearing. This is an area that could be improved with better funding for deaf young people to take part in sport activities in their area.
Andy. Not him, me.
August 6, 2013
I’m disappointed not to have heard and seen more about these games. Mind you, I was always doubtful about the idea of holding them at the far end of Europe. This is not the best access possible!
The fact is, deaf athletes can run jump and throw as far as anyone else, that isn’t the problem. The problem results from the way athletics is run. Behind the scenes things are pretty grisly. Communal changing rooms packed with dozens of athletes all excitedly chattering does not make for a good deaf environment. The officials tend to be total martinets and any infraction of the rules, however minor is jumped upon.
Deaf people have tried and failed in the past, sometimes heartbreakingly badly, to deal with this and compete on exactly the same terms. We DO need a different approach, a deaf one. We CAN’T be herded about by people with megaphones. We CAN’T be briefed by someone shouting over the noise of the changing rooms or the noise of a crowd in the arena. And so on and so forth. Remembering at all times that one mistake in procedure or the rules of the day can result in disqualification. It’s a severe penalty for something that deaf people are good at : getting it wrong.
If we DID integrate then we would need to make these things crystal clear from the beginning. Things like starts are very tricky for deaf people. When I was competing the starter would stand >in frontbehind< the competitors. No puff = no start! Additionally starting with your head up is marginally slower than starting with your head down. There are all sorts of little things like that which could be a disadvantage for deaf people if they were not allowed for. But to allow for them requires special modifications to the rules. That's why they went alone in the first place, it is because the athletics rules did not allow for deaf people. So obviously they said "Boggor it, we'll start our own".
But now I think it is time to ask for integration with the Paralympics and the hearing athletics world and to ask for special rules to be made for deaf people so that we can compete on equal terms with each other. Perhaps this will be a starting point for deaf athletics to get on a level playing field with everyone else.
Andy. Not him, me.
August 6, 2013
Damn! That should read “In front, not behind the competitors”.
Just in case anyone cares…
Editor
August 6, 2013
I care, Andy! Thanks for the comment, and the clarification! Charlie
Linda Richards
August 10, 2013
Great article Charlie….
Deaflympics must be separate… The linguistic and cultural aspects are so total, rich and inclusive. If ‘access’ is left to the interpreters then God help us. There were some dubious selections of personnel called ‘interpreters’ at Sofia 2013. One guy couldn’t understand a Deaf fellow countryman despite the very short sentence being signed three times…. Some of us looked on in disbelief.
Incidentally, after Taipei 2009, Clarion announced they would support and sponsor Team GB next time around via UK Deaf Sports. Did they actually do this? Why were the GB athletes having to raise so much money themselves? Clarion were received like manna from heaven at the time….
Still should be funding nonetheless. You could see the difference between those who were well established and those who made the grade for selection but didn’t have the technique that would come from being well funded and getting good training opportunities and support.