A new school year has just started and kids everywhere are going back to school – or just starting it, like my son and his friends. That, and Andy’s great post for parents of deaf kids, has got me thinking about my own (deaf) education.
I don’t mean to be negative, but er, it was a bit rubbish.
I went to a famous oral deaf boarding school. Opinions on this school are split. Those who loved it tend to either be able to hear quite a lot, or they just ignored the educational crap and spent all of their time there larking about with their friends. Those who have bad memories of the place either had a bad experience for their own reasons, or, like me, can’t hear at all, and found it difficult – or actually impossible – to follow lessons.
The irony of that isn’t lost on me.
Before boarding school, I went to a mainstream school with a PHU, where I spent most of my time hidden in corners of classrooms, reading books (handily, I became deaf just after I’d learned to read). Reading books was the easy option – I didn’t have to try and lipread anyone. It was also fun and exciting, because books ARE fun and exciting if you pick the right ones.
But then, at boarding school, I wasn’t allowed to tuck myself away into classroom corners with my latest adventure novel; I was expected to PARTICIPATE. However, this was also the time when I met loads of other deaf kids like me, so I was thrilled at the prospect of playing and talking with others who could understand me and be understood. I was normal; the same as everyone else. Or was I?
Forget the highly paid, “specially trained” teachers of the deaf who ran the place. I wouldn’t have got through seven years at that school without my friends. The ones who could hear more than me – i.e. everyone! – interpreted bits of lessons; mostly giving me summaries under desks or telling me what we had to do for our homework. Others taught me to fingerspell, and later, to sign (badly, but it did the job back then). We all helped each other in some way or another. We rocked.
Some of the teachers were OK. Obviously, I couldn’t lipread any of them 100%, because I’m not a robot, but I found that those who were more generous with using the blackboards and OHPs (this was before PowerPoint and Smartboards were invented) were the easiest to follow. Looking back, though, it seems kind of lame. Why didn’t we all just, er…. sign?
My English Literature A Level teachers are a good example of what it was like. We had three of them:
I think we all liked Teacher 1 best – he didn’t talk very much. He spent every lesson sitting next to the OHP, writing translations of the Olde English books that we were studying, so that we could copy it all down in our exercise books. He would sometimes discuss bits of the texts, but mostly he liked making football related jokes. If he was feeling brave, he would try to fingerspell the odd word, while keeping his eyes on the classroom door in case anyone came in and caught him in the act.
Teacher 2 talked a lot, but I’m not really sure what about. His health problems featured quite often, though. He also made us read aloud the plays that we were studying. On an enjoyment scale of 1 to 10, I think I would give that a zero.
Teacher 3 was quite scary, and completely impossible for me to lipread. She had one of those mouths that don’t actually move much, you see. So, what was she thinking of, working in a DEAF SCHOOL?! Someone must have thought it was a good idea. That someone wouldn’t have been me. I only got the odd word, and spent the rest of her lessons desperately looking sideways at my friend, who secretly told me the important bits, like which page to turn to. And then we’d get told to “stop talking and concentrate”!
I wouldn’t mind so much, but that was supposed to be specialist deaf education. Surely being a teacher involves communication, and if you can’t communicate with your pupils, um, what’s the point? I wouldn’t imagine there were any deaf people on the school’s interview panels, though, and if there ever were, they’d no doubt be amongst the world’s top 10 lipreaders, or actually, practically hearing.
The more I think about it, the stranger it seems.
I won’t even mention the “auditory training” we had, where we were grouped according to how much we could hear. I was put with the other profoundly deaf kids, and we had to sit for ages as teachers held pieces of paper in front of their mouths and we had to strain through headphones to see if we could hear the difference between “Jennifer” and “Christopher”. They really shouldn’t have bothered.
I give up. I did actually pass all of my A Levels, but not with good grades (interestingly, my marks improved a lot when I went to university and had interpreters). So, how did we manage that? Doing at least two hours’ homework every night may have had something to do with it. I really don’t know.
Those days are thankfully behind me now, and I’ve come through it with a few qualifications and a bunch of brilliant friends for life.
I’ve no idea if the deaf youth of today read Limping Chicken. Is it er, cool enough? Well, if you’re a youth, and you’re reading this, I’d like to say good luck to you. If you can’t understand someone, it’s their fault, not yours. If you’re worried about something, talk to somebody, because a problem shared is a problem halved, at least.
And above all, don’t give up. Because you rock.
Jen Dodds is a Contributing Editor for The Limping Chicken. When she’s not looking after chickens or children, Jen can be found translating, proofreading and editing stuff over at Team HaDo Ltd (teamhado.com).
The Limping Chicken is the UK’s independent deaf news and deaf blogs website, posting the very latest in deaf opinion, commentary and news, every weekday! Don’t forget to follow the site on Twitter and Facebook, and check out our supporters on the right-hand side of this site or click here.
David Buxton
September 20, 2013
Jen’s article is what really happened to me and even I remembered very well that my specialist qualified teacher of the deaf often picked up deaf pupils who can hear her speech when she spoke to us with A4 paper in front of her lip – telling others who cannot hear that they must learn from those who can hear!! Totally unfair and certainly bullying in spite of teachers knowing that we can’t hear any words!! This is not real education at all! We supposed to learn how to read and write fluently! We must work together to campaign for better and fully accessible education for deaf children. Please don’t sit back seeing our deaf children still struggling in the mainstream schools getting much less qualifications – they need us to campaign – share our experience, tell politicians, so on
Thank you Jen for sharing your article
David
Natalya (@barakta)
September 20, 2013
I was mainstream educated and I found the stress of trying to manage a regular secondary school made me ill with balance problems as my brain can’t compensate for deafness related balance issues if I’m too exhausted all the time. In primary my oldest friend was in my class and I realise now how much I cued what we should do from her – at secondary we were in different buildings.
I got through my education but I realise now how much better I do and am not exhausted if I work with my deafness not against it. That means not killing myself with ‘concentration fatigue’ as described by Ian Noon here but using communication support which works which in my case is STTR/palantypy but could involve sign language.
I am angry that I wasn’t given access to sign language as a young deaf child, it would have been very easy to have used sign along with everything else as there’s times when it is very easy. It’s been harder for me to learn as an adult, not to mention expensive! I was also told my hand impairments would stop me being able to sign, which is a problem only hearing people have, deaf people (and usually interpreters) rarely have a problem understanding me.
Just because someone ‘can’ doesn’t mean they’re not doing less well than they could, or that they’re not exhausted and or miserable all the time. We should be supporting every option possible and not judging some as more valuable than another for any people other than ourselves.
Martin
September 20, 2013
‘I don’t mean to be negative, but er, it was a bit rubbish’ made me, wryly, smile! 14 years of rubblish education and then another decade on different kind of rubbish education! Of course it still shaped what I am today though! Wont dwell further on this. More importantly, being a governor of a brilliant bilingual primary school is such a wonderful privilege, seeing those children getting positive vibes! This model education now widespread? probably not, sigh?
Rachel
September 20, 2013
Hahahaha! If teacher 2 is who I’m thinking of, I absolutely loved him! So hilarious.
Have to say your experience was the complete opposite of mine, I thought it was fantastic and I wouldn’t have done as well in any other school. But then I never had any problems lip reading the teachers… Now I’m in the ‘real world’ I actually find it amazing how easy it was to lip read every single word, as I struggle to do that now. I know the subject is very controversial but if any of my girls were deaf I would choose the oral education route over signed without a doubt. I gained so much from it and loved my time at school 🙂
Audrey
September 20, 2013
Exactly the same for me at school, Jen. Yes, we need to support all these young deaf people for better access to education and ENJOY learning.
elizabeth1949
September 20, 2013
This story is Victorian…never should have happened, I know it does happen because I read books too!…Thank you for sharing this Jen Dodds x
Michelle Hedley
September 20, 2013
Interesting article, one which I think highlightsthe simple fact we are not all the same. So the mistake education authorities make is to treat us all the same.
That said, my experience was different in that my education authority didn’t believe in deaf schools or units, and I went to a “normal” mainstream school. No sign language was permitted and so I learned to talk. Somehow against all the odds I managed to learn to talk and have good speech, despite having very little hearing, and actually loved being at school! How much influence being in a normal mainstream school with no other deaf children has had on the end result we will never know without the benefit of hindsight.
Tim
September 20, 2013
Yeah, “prep” involved working out was was said during the day. I spent the lessons day-dreaming about golf and other rubbish.
I could be wrong about the ‘auditory training’ but I seem to remember those who could hear better getting praise and stars whereas us profoundly Deaf were treated as if we were slacking somehow.
I was talking to a BSL terp on twitter about how I hated oralism and she said that Deaf kids still developed sign in the playground, but I’m not sure that happened at this place because it was shut away, really. Still, I’m progressing with my BSLnow, I just wish I learned when I was a kid.
Shane Gilchrist
September 20, 2013
I love how delusional the oralists and their fans are – ow they manage to convince everyone that they are experts etc. Even so with net and easy & better access to informed decisions about deaf education, the majority of parents are still obsessed about forcing the majority culture on their deaf kids. It is interesting that they are building new schools for kids with autism yet closing down deaf schools & PHUs?
Rob
September 20, 2013
I was of the opinion that being Oralistic was the best choice to manage in a Hearing World. Having experience behind me, it certainly did help me a lot in many respects, but I feel that the deaf world itself should not be divided by the unfair lottery of what education they had. This has been my experience that being Oralistic, rather than a BSL user, had placed me at bigger disadvantage personally in accessing the needs I had for communication support, and social support and even networking with the Deaf world. It also placed me at a disadvantage when many people of the Hearing world did not believe I was really deaf! It was therefore the most hurtful experience to be rejected by my Deaf peers as being “too hearing” for them. Can’t win one way or another. I do not regret my education achievements, but my school could have been more relaxed about signing and enable all Deaf children to have a choice when they leave school to sign or use BSL to suit. My view is that education should be accessible in whatever format is best. In the case of deaf people, it would have been a healthy mixture of BSL and Oral lesson to ensure the best of both worlds.
Julia Spillman
September 20, 2013
Very interesting. This is probably the school that I was desperate to go to when I was at secondary school. Instead I went to a private mainstream school without any support, where ironically I can relate to many of the issues referred to in this article. I really struggled at university and I can honestly say that until I learnt to sign as an adult I had no chance of coping in any work environment.
I had always thought I would have been happier at a school like this. However as one of the deafer kids with no speech recognition I would have had no chance with the speech listening classes so I suppose I wouldn’t really have been better off!
LJ.
September 20, 2013
I’m left thinking here…. What School? What years? I also was at deaf boarding schools, namely Ovingdean Hall school and Mary Hare Grammar School.
Although I did not particularly enjoyed my days at both schools, (I missed my mom!) I seem to have done ‘Okay’ education wise. I’m profoundly deaf and did not sign. Whoah, the early to mid Seventies were a big no no towards signing, but I did okay, and in a way I’m glad I did not sign and was… if you like ‘forced oralism’. Today I am very much in the hearing World and cope very well. I think I would have hated being confined to a little deaf pond.
Jen Dodds (@deafpower)
September 20, 2013
Hello everyone, many thanks for your interesting comments. I’m sorry that some of you have also had unpleasant experiences. That’s life, I guess?
As for the school’s name, I decided not to mention it because a) somehow, that made me feel gossipy, I’m not sure why, and b) is it really relevant? I know that this kind of thing happens all over the world, actually. No point in narrowing it down. Better to look at the big picture and think of the future, no?
The more I think about this, the more bizarre it seems. Too bad that it mostly happens to children who think it’s normal (is it really?), or their fault, and that things cannot get better.
Liz Brading
September 21, 2013
Jen, I have been meaning to let you know I love reading your articles!! I left that school, feeling I had the best school experience ever, only to realize in later years how much more I could have gained academically and socially if it was a fully inclusive and signing school, with proper teachers and role models who embrace Deaf cultural values, BSL, etc. I sometimes ask myself how the heck I managed to lipread all these years and I have far less tolerance nowadays. Sadly, the minds of too many former pupils remain colonized by oralism today. As my sister has said, we should set up a school in competition! 😉 And I love living in the San Francisco Bay Area, among great Deaf leaders.
On another note, I hope to have the opportunity to go to Sign Circle next time. You wrote a great article about that. 🙂
Rob
September 21, 2013
I agree with you not to name schools or persons on this site. A volatile subject enough as it is! I did go back to the school, and had a good chat with the headmaster and teachers. I was able to give them a “piece of my mind” about where the education went wrong for me personally. What was surprising is that most of them questioned the fact that I ever went to this school because I speak too well!
Double standards here I guess.
Someone
September 21, 2013
Please make sure that the BDA among other British DPOs will raise this issue in upcoming CRPD parallel report as the UK and Northern Ireland will be reviewed by the CRPD Committee soon. If you have a look at article 24 of the CRPD, deaf schools should really provide tuition in sign language.
V
September 21, 2013
JESUS!! Rachel! Calm down will you!! How many deaf children have suffered as a result of an oral education! It’s a hidden statistic without a doubt, There is no harm in combining sign language with learning how to lipread or talk in English. Rachel, I have a challenge for you, I wonder if you are able to learn a new language now such as Spanish for example and see how you get on?!
The madness of the whole thing that it is so simple to incorporate sign language in an education……whatever for deaf children than rather having them ploughing through their school life to satisfy a society that they seems to think that they knows best for deaf people.
There is nothing wrong with trying to encourage deaf children to learn how to talk and lipread, and therefore, there is also nothing wrong with trying to encourage deaf children to learn how to sign from an early age, a simple solution at the end of the day!
Rachel
September 22, 2013
V…. Calm down! This is the problem with people sometimes…. Unable to see the bigger picture! I was only saying I enjoyed my education. I am not ‘oral’… I use BSL, but am also able to speak… I’m very much in the deaf community, all my friends are deaf, my husband is deaf… I use bsl throughout every aspect of my life. What is wrong with saying I had a good experience at school and would want the same for my children? Of course if they were deaf I would want them to have the best of both worlds. Because I want the best for them! So instead of jumping to conclusions and judging me because of what I wrote I suggest you read back and try to find WHERE exactly I said it was wrong for deaf children to learn to sign?!
Tim
September 22, 2013
The school have often argued that their results vindicate their policy. Just one problem – they are able to stack the deck in their favour from the start with entrance exams and interviews.
Just visited the Wikipedia page for the school and it seems that now pupils are allowed to use sign language outside of class. Next step – inside class. By contrast, heck out Hamilton Lodge’s fantastic communication policy.
John
September 22, 2013
V – no need to attack Rachel for sharing her personal positive experiences. We are all different and entitled to our own opinions. One size does not fit all. Rachel did not say anything about sign language or anything like that. You are a victim of your own prejudice by assuming that she does not approve of sign language just cos of her positive experience.