After 18 months of campaigning and 50,000+ petition signatures, MPs have agreed that concerns over cuts to funding to support for deaf children are so serious that Parliament should debate them.
Deafness is invariably described as the invisible disability. The needs of deaf children too often get overlooked. Well, not on Thursday. This isn’t going to be a debate in some poky committee room – it will be on the floor of the House of Commons. The needs of deaf children will take centre-stage and the Government will be forced to explain what exactly they are doing to make sure deaf children get the help they need. And the whole world can judge whether this is good enough. This is a big deal, ladies and gentlemen.
The debate is going to be an opportunity to shine a spotlight on the fact that help for deaf children is being cut across the country. The Government say they have protected funding for vulnerable learners yet this protection isn’t being carried through at a local level. 29% of local authorities are cutting services and another 25% are at risk, according to analysis from the National Deaf Children’s Society (NDCS).
You might take the Government’s point that this is a matter for local communities. But there’s only so much fire-fighting that parents can do without getting exhausted or neglecting their core job – being Mums and Dads to their deaf child. It’s time for the Government to take action to stop the fires starting in the first place.
There are different ways the Government can do this. It could intervene directly in some of the worse cases and name and shame council bosses that don’t protect funding for vulnerable learners. The Government seems quite happy to tell councils what to do about rubbish collections and council magazines after all.
It could also introduce stronger checks over councils. It could make Ofsted inspect specialist services for deaf children. It’s easy for councils to cut services if they don’t think there are going to be any serious consequences.
The debate is also going to be an opportunity to say that, well actually, before even all of these cuts, in many places the support deaf children were getting wasn’t good enough. Over two thirds of deaf children fail to get 5 good GCSEs. It’s an opportunity to debate openly the fact that:
- Too many families aren’t getting enough support after their deaf child is born. Where they want to learn sign language, families sometimes have to pay thousands of pounds just to learn to communicate with their own child.
- Too many deaf children don’t get the specialist support they need in the classroom. They have to learn in poky noisy classrooms without extra help and support.
- Too many deaf young people don’t get the help they need to prepare for adulthood and independence.
My biggest fear is that the Government will, come Thursday’s debate, do as they’ve done before and just bat away concerns. They’ll point to tiny pots of money given for small projects – not unappreciated but not enough. They’ll point to new laws on special educational needs even though this doesn’t address the fundamental issues deaf children face.
This is why a big turnout from MPs is needed. The more MPs that turn up and say something must be done, the more likely the Government will actually do something substantial. So MPs need to know this debate is important. MPs need to hear from families and deaf people of the individual stories and challenges that deaf children face. MPs need to challenge the Government to do more, much more.
And hopefully then Thursday’s debate will be the start of a lasting change that makes a big difference to deaf children.
To ask your MP to come along on Thursday, you can email him / her via the NDCS website. For more information about the debate, you can also check out NDCS’s Stolen Futures campaign pages.
Ian Noon has been profoundly deaf since birth, giving him an interesting perspective “on what needs to change for deaf children and young people in the UK. It also means I have very questionable taste in music.” When he’s not stealing the biscuits in the office, he runs, does yoga and plans his next backpacking holiday. He works for a deaf charity but his views expressed on his blog and here, are his own. Follow him on Twitter as @IanNoon
The Limping Chicken is the UK’s independent deaf news and deaf blogs website, posting the very latest in deaf opinion, commentary and news, every weekday! Don’t forget to follow the site on Twitter and Facebook, and check out our supporters on the right-hand side of this site – or click here.
andy
October 14, 2013
One thing that needs mentioning is that action can also be taken at a lower level. Most people do not actually know how a council works. Nor did I, once upon a time until one time I found I needed to know how it all worked. Most people find this pretty boring and don’t bother but if you have to then it becomes worthwhile.
The reason is that you find out how to make things happen. We’ve often struggled with things like access to services and even outright discrimination without really knowing how to fix it. Knowing how the local council works is a big help to doing that.
Essentially a council is divoded into two parts. One part is the paid officials of the council. Overpaid in many cases at the top level, they tend to get a bit carried away with their own importance. It makes them difficult to deal with. It’s hard to get changes made because they have rules and they use them to their advantage.
The second most useful part is the elected councillors. Again most of the public take no notice of these people. Even when there is an election there is hardly any interest, the turnout and voting figures tell us that. Those election leaflets that come through the door…. people don’t read them they chuck them away. Boring rubbish.
And yet this is where the power lies. We should sit up and take notice of what these people say because when things go wrong we can get in touch with them and ask for help. If we don’t get that help we can claim disability discrimination. Councils are Big Time on non-discrinination issues and you can shame them into taking action. You can work with your councillor, or if they are unhelpful you can put pressure on them to act. They are YOUR representative. They may be pompous and posh and put on airs and graces but at the end of the day they are there for YOU!
Otherwise we can justifiably claim discrimination. I have just had an extraordinary lesson in the power that isabled people can weild if they wish to I don’t want to drag up the rights and wrongs here but what I am saying is that a councillor was effectively removed from power by a determined group of disabled people who decided that he had said something offensive. For full details Google Brewer, disability.
What I am saying here is that they showed what immense power we could have if we showed up these people who try to deny us the help we need. I don’t believe the Brewer complaints were really justified but it has made me aware of >just how much power< we could have if we tackled the problems in a similar way. It has been quite a lesson for me anyway and so I pass it to other campaigners so they can learn from it.
Study your council. Learn how they operate. Learn which levers to pull. It can be done.
Nice bit of writing Ian, keep on truckin dude.