Sadiq Khan has been elected Mayor of London with a landslide victory.
Khan also won the respect of the deaf community by posting a video of himself using British Sign Language and pledging to introduce a BSL Charter for all services under his direct control should he be elected.
Couldn’t more politicians ‘do a Khan’ and make videos to connect with deaf people? It’s a crying shame that Khan’s video seems so unusual and special for a major political figure. Even if you don’t agree with his politics, and most Londoners do, at least he took time to learn some BSL and reach out to the deaf people who, in England at least, reside in the most stagnant political backwater.
Even if all London’s deaf people voted as one bloc, no one would even notice that they did. Deaf people made no difference to the election result in London. There is no significant ‘Deaf Vote’.
So Khan reaching out to people who need sign language cannot be seen as electioneering. It’s not Cleggist pledge-making-and-breaking. If he didn’t bother make a pledge to deaf Londoners it wouldn’t make any difference to his chances what-so-ever. So his video was a noble act. He sees the moral good in better services for BSL users and wants to do something about it.
I remember the Tories refusal to produce their manifesto in BSL at the last general election but Labour did. The Tory campaign, led by the notorious Linton Crosby, couldn’t justify the time and expense on making a video just for the sake of winning the votes of deaf people.
And even if there was any benefit in winning ‘the Deaf vote’ they probably wouldn’t have bothered.
The deaf community, at least on social media, seems solidly on the left. Socially progressive and anti-austerity but with a noticeable tendency towards policies that lead to limits on immigration. It’s not worth the effort for the Tories.
The deaf community, at least if social media is to be believed, don’t seem to vote Tory.
But back to Khan. Let’s take a look at what he pledged during the campaign. He said:
“If elected as your Mayor, I pledge that all public services under the direct control of the Mayor will implement the BSL charter to empower deaf people and remove discrimination.”
Just how good is that offer?
It’s worth pointing out which public services aren’t under the Mayor’s direct control so everyone is clear and doesn’t get disappointed.
He doesn’t control the NHS in London or most functions provided directly by the London Boroughs, like social care, leisure facilities, revenue collection, libraries or Education.
So expect no change with anything to do with those. Each Borough will have to implement their own charter and that’s not down to Khan. And so will the NHS and that’s not up to him either.
But he does have control over Transport for London (TfL) which runs the Underground, Overground rail and buses.
How a BSL charter could be implemented on the London transport network remains to be seen. The tube and buses are themselves a very visually based experience already.
I’d expect more staff being trained in deaf awareness and BSL. Video Relay services on enquiry telephone numbers or BSL video on websites. Maybe TV screens at major stations with live BSL updates of platform changes or other crucial verbally given information.
London won’t fundamentally change for deaf people now Khan is the Mayor – he doesn’t have the power – but the transport system could become a more deaf-friendly place.
Even so, now is the time for Khan to deliver on the promises he has made even if they mean much less than they seemed. He must constitute a BSL Charter Committee for London at the earliest opportunity to get things moving.
However, the new Mayor doesn’t need deaf votes to get re-elected and in the real-world of politics that means deaf Londoners could be waiting a long time for their charter. The people who got him signing in front of that camera in the first place will need to find a way to keep the pressure up now Khan is safely tucked away in City Hall.
Andy is the hearing father of a Deaf son, and is also a child of Deaf parents. He is Managing Director of Cambridgeshire Deaf Association, runs Peterborough United’s deaf football teams and is Chairman of the Peterborough and District Deaf Children’s Society and teaches sign language in primary schools. Contact him on twitter @LC_AndyP
queby
May 7, 2016
I’m pleased that he is doing this, as a matter of interest, can anyone tell me what percentage of deaf people use sign language? Thanks
MW
May 7, 2016
Can one ask why why the number game of how many uses sign language. ..when there is a need for just one perdon matters… and that called making good access for all and meeting their abilities rather than compromising their well being. QUEBY. ..Are you playing politics with our lives? I had rather see this questioning stop and start valuing diversity and equality and on the hope we don’t become socially disadvantage because bigotry still exist. I hope Khan understands yhe variety of deaf communication access and it is not just about BSL.
Queby
May 8, 2016
MW…what point are you making? I’m asking a perfectly simple question. I have no agenda nor am I ‘playing politics’. I simply would like to know what percentage of people use sign language for research purposes. I’m also trying to find out what percentage of mobility disabled people use wheelchairs. I’m deaf myself and deeply resent your implication that I may be some sort of bigot. It’s not a ‘number game’ but a perfectly legitimate question. I’m not trying to make any points or trying to socially disadvantage you!
Alison
May 8, 2016
I have emailed Sadiq Khan direct and said that I hope it wasn’t just a tick box/lip service exercise and that he will continue to have BSL interpreters with him (in full view of cameras) and captions for all his speeches. I cited that South Africa (even though they have few qualified interpreters) & USA have interpreters and captions for political statements from governors and mayors and from sessions in parliament on mainstream TV (not in some dark recess of the TV channelling)
Even if there is only 1 Deaf person in the entire viewing audience of the UK there should be BSL interpretation. Your ability to ‘speak well’ and ‘listen’ does not give you the right to usurp anyone else’s rights to information and access.
It’s such a shame that deaf people (Deaf, deaf, hard of hearing, deafened) are still arguing over labels and communication methods and putting each other down when in fact this has been orchestrated by hearing people and the medical establishment who have divided and conquered you all! When you’re all infighting it’s much easier for them to give no access at all, to anyone (too expensive blah blah)
Josh
May 13, 2016
Does that include playing off BSL with people who prefer subtitled videos?
I would have thought subtitles would benefit a wider range of deaf people from all backgrounds and unify the “middle ground” of Deaf politics.
Why isn’t this an option?
queby
May 8, 2016
I contacted the BBC a while ago about a captioning issue and the person who replied made a point about how expensive it is. I thought this was ironic given the publicity we’ve all seen about the profligacy at the Beeb!
Josh
May 14, 2016
Ha its probably the cheapest solution if implemented correctly. same old excuses everywhere. Very few subtitles on internet too.
MW
May 8, 2016
Well said Alison
MW
May 8, 2016
Queby. … Thank you for your much clearer comment and apologies for my comment bigot. I do suggest rather than research via L.C. to communicate via Freedom of Information ..that if you have the time and money…communicate that query with C.C.G as I have done (wanting to know how many deaf made complaints and the outcomes) you will be surprised as I was how poor documentation and the transparcy that comes with it. Alison was spot on her comments on how divided we are at working together caused by our dear able peers and the medical profession ( there are some d/Deaf people in the system) often fails us. No doubt I stand fast…that we are not a number on the back of cost but a human being with additional needs that requires a fair level playing field better access on all levels and not just a language issue. Once again sorry if my earlier reply was not helpful but it did inflame my frustration that we are still at a stage talking about numbers.
Shane Gilchrist
May 8, 2016
Excellent post there, Andy Palmer, I enjoyed reading it. As for your thoughts on the deaf community being more on the left…a good number of deafies are quite conservative – even in Labour heartlands. Sadly I don’t think many would sign up for Corbyn’s wagon – there are always two factions – the bigoted right-wing faction and the inclusive & liberal left-wing faction – there’s two Facebook groups on the Brexit debate already – care to guess which is which? 🙂 The only good thing is everything is progressive 😀
pennybsl
May 8, 2016
Just wanted to add to comments above about the Dead Community’s geniune concerns about percentages of deaf people who primarily sign.
Recently in Facebook we saw a heated exchange between people, deaf themselves, using more negative than constructive tone in questioning the focused attention on BSL access for a ‘small minority’ than the larger number of non-signers who want English access – captions for instance.
The recent advertisements by AoHL using negativity about hearing loss for deaf children, aimed at raising money for reach to cure deafness, have distressed and angered people who preferred a less pitied stance upon deaf kids.
The NDCS and many Deaf Youngster-focused initiatives use positive publicity, emphasising active social participation, whatever the child has to help deafness or communication method for healthy engagement.
Families need professionals who are more aware of the achievable approach rather than the trigger-happy cure-deaf stance which pulls back the progress re access and participation in society.
We who use BSL would happily support our other deaf people who need English text access,better acoustics and quality visual aids.
Andy
May 8, 2016
I’ve always found the hearing loss stats unhelpful. There are only 130,000 severely or profoundly deaf people in the UK so the percentage of those that sign will be considerably more than if you count everyone over 70 with mild hearing loss as a deaf person too http://limpingchicken.com/2014/09/26/the-question-is-the-much-used-statistic-10-million-deaf-people-helpful/
pennybsl
May 11, 2016
Groan…..in my comment above there’s a typo error ‘Dead’; it should be ‘Deaf’ – iPhone spellcheck is a tyrant!!!!