Channel 4’s Extraordinary Teens documentary (watch it here) went out last night, and quickly became one of the top 5 trending topics on Twitter (check out the hashtag #ExtraordinaryTeens) with a strong response from deaf people across the country.
Here are 9 things I personally took from the programme:
1. Despite using the oral approach to education, sign language is widely used at Mary Hare
Mary Hare has long been known for the fact that BSL is not used in lessons, but sign language can be seen everywhere else at the school.
The programme mainly focused on Lewis (pictured above), a first-language BSL user, and we also saw students signing, well, literally everywhere. At lunch, in their living accommodation, and occasionally in lessons among themselves too.
Some signed in a more BSL way, others along with their speech, and it was lovely to see that this was completely accepted, with pupils able to express themselves naturally, in a way that best suited them.
2. Not signing can lead to feeling left out
The programme followed Andrew (left) as he tried to become Head Boy, asking his peers for a “second chance.”
Interestingly, Andrew recognised his lack of popularity was in large part due to the fact he didn’t sign, showing just how important being able to use some level of signing is for being accepted socially at the school.
3. For many pupils at the school, Mary Hare saves them from mainstream education
It was striking that the twins Fae and Mae had suffered to such a degree in mainstream education, despite being able to speak clearly, and having such strong lipreading skills.
They described being left out, not invited to social gatherings and said how horrific their experience in mainstream education was.
It was clear that for them, attending Mary Hare was something that changed not only their educational chances but their sense of being included socially by being among other deaf children.
This said something powerful about the experiences of many deaf children in mainstream schools. Unfortunately, the vast majority of those children cannot go to Mary Hare, or for that matter, another deaf school.
4. But Mary Hare can be a bubble
As we saw one of the twins struggling with being confident in the outside world, we saw how being at the school (and perhaps this is like any other deaf school) can be a safe bubble for the children, that means that they have to adapt when they leave.
What I’d say is it would still seem better to be in a supportive, inclusive environment for your formative years, then make that adjustment, than being in an environment which you struggle with.
5. Teachers aren’t always honest with Deaf children
Some deaf people talk of how their teachers weren’t always honest with them growing up, how they were told they had great speech for example, only to find that people couldn’t understand them when they ventured into the outside world.
There was a moment that stood out in this respect, as Lewis repeatedly failed to distinguish between two separate sounds from his speech therapist. When she told him that he was doing well, he said immediately: “don’t lie.”
While it was clear the therapist was trying to encourage Lewis, this moment has gained a strong reaction from deaf people on social media, praising him for recognising the reality of the situation and calling his teacher out on it.
6. Parents who sign to their deaf kids, have close bonds with them
Seeing how close Lewis was to his mum was really moving, especially seeing how they communicated so fluently, using both sign language and speech. You could see that being able to communicate clearly with his mum had helped make Lewis who he was today.
7. Cochlear implants aren’t instant fixes
Videos showing instant, moving reactions to cochlear implants being turned on have become ubiquitous in recent years, but this programme showed the other side, as Lewis struggled to identify any sounds at all when his implant was first turned on.
The programme showed the reality of implants for many deaf people, that learning to hear with them is a process. In the end we saw how months later, Lewis’s ability to hear had been enhanced, and he played us a recording of birds tweeting to show that he’d started to appreciate sound.
8. There’s great positives in deaf children being educated together
At the start of the programme, I watched Lewis messing around in class, teasing a classmate then making a funny facial expression, and I turned to my wife and said to her: “he couldn’t do that at mainstream school.”
What I meant by that is that he wouldn’t have been able to express himself in the same way.
We saw, across the programme, deaf pupils who were able to be themselves. To mess around, to interact with one another or with teachers confidently, to feel like full members of their school.
9. Deaf schools, whatever their approach, are one of the key building blocks of the deaf community
As we gained an insight into the four pupils and the school more widely, it came across that since so many pupils had close bonds, and were also using sign language, that we were seeing some of the future of the deaf community, right there on our screens.
In spending years alongside other deaf pupils, these pupils were forming bonds that would continue later in life.
While it would be wrong to assume they would all go into the deaf community, it seems likely that many will continue with a strong sense of deaf identity and solidarity, even coming from a school that is well known for an oral approach.
Read Charlie’s article about what Deaf people think about Mary Hare, written before the programme aired, here.
What did you think of the programme? Tell us below.
Watch the programme on All 4 (UK only) here.
Read more of Charlie’s articles here.
Charlie Swinbourne is a journalist and is the editor of Limping Chicken, and is also an award-winning filmmaker and screenwriter.
Philippa
December 15, 2017
Great article to sum up the programme. Just a slight change to point 5. It should be Lewis not Andrew?!
Editor
December 15, 2017
Apologies, I hadn’t fully woken up this morning when I wrote it and corrected the names soon afterwards! Thanks. Charlie (Ed)
Sarah Playforth
December 15, 2017
Excellent summary of all the things I was thinking watching this. The ‘bubble’ of Mary Hare survives beyond school for most who attend. I’m hopeful that Andrew will not only keep in touch with his school friends, but soon see the value of learning BSL.
Linda Richards
December 15, 2017
Point 10: the programme showed how the adage of ‘Give me the child..’ and how what happens in their formative years is so true for all three of the youngsters. Lewis comes off the strongest – so a big shout-out to his lovely mum and Frank Barnes School, for their roles in developing such a great well-rounded youngster to begin with. That’s what will enable him to survive the hearing world and deal with the ‘lies’.
Victoria
December 15, 2017
Every deaf child’s path in life is very very different, what suits one will not suit another child or family. I don’t sign, both myself and my daughter have always been close and this hasn’t hindered our bond!
The reason the school has such a great success is they are able to adapt their teaching to each child because of the small class sizes and their extensive knowledge in the deaf world.
Linda Richards
December 16, 2017
Are we talking about MH?
I didn’t see any evidence that MH school was adapting to any of the pupils featured – as in, signing to them, talking about things honestly, using alternative communication techniques, suggesting strategies for life, etc..
pennybsl
December 15, 2017
Seconded to Sarah Playforth’s comment.
Excellent yet pertinent review, Editor.
Many thanks on behalf of us MH alumni & allies who feel the same, and non-MH Deafies who share the same belief that to ensure safer post-school development for deaf children of all abilities, there is a need for healthier Deaf Education learning ‘bubbles’.
Surdophile
December 15, 2017
You’re right Charlie . What is astonishing is that increased use of technology does not equate to an increase in Oralism / Auralism .
40 years ago MH had “rudimentary” technology but far more profoundly deaf children who could speak skilfully as well as being socially confident. I didn’t see any evidence of this during the programme .
Instead we have a fudge that is confusing for deaf children . It is time for deaf teachers to be completely honest about the requirements of deaf children so they can be better supported After Mary Hare .
I was flabbergasted to see that Andrew was one of the very few students that didn’t sign! That wasn’t the case before as signers were definitely in the minority.
Instead of pushing the cochlear agenda why didn’t they show a deaf child brought up by BSL method yet speaks very well and is confident. I’m sure there are plenty of examples .
Nearly all Mary Hare children from profoundly deaf upwards would have been able to order a train ticket to anywhere before the days of CI. I think this project has completely failed because it isn’t well supported by other means as deaf children are very visual. Technology is not just hearing aids but apps and captioning equipment as well as Video relay. I agree MH is a sort of bubble but it looks like the teachers and audiologists are in a bigger one.
A lot of problems are caused by poor primary education and after they leave school and it is a matter of urgency that this is addressed.
Too much focus on residual hearing has neglected the more important goal of maximising deaf children’s residual intelligence and unlocking their true potential!
Jamie Dow
December 15, 2017
While you raise some valid points regarding ability to integrate with other deaf children in a community setting, from a teacher’s perspective I think the pedagogical approach taken by the school is appalling. I was horrified to see that despite Lewis demonstrating a good understanding of what he was being taught, the fact that the teacher couldn’t sign meant what he said wasn’t getting through at all. I think a school whose philosophy revolves around what children can’t do as opposed to what they can do is counterproductive to their sense of identity. Deaf children are not broken, and they don’t need to be fixed. Their education in MH’s context however, is obviously broken by the teachers and staff inability to sign. I was fuming after watching the programme, because I believe that professionals working with deaf people should be signing, and using BSL, not perpetuating the oralist method that the Milan 1880 conference inflicted on us. I’m profoundly deaf, and I accessed my undergrad course in English Literature entirely in BSL. Didn’t stop me graduating with honours. BSL didn’t stop me getting into a PGDE programme to train as a Secondary English teacher either, so I find it completely absurd that the school panders to oralism as the only way to access learning.
Linda Richards
December 15, 2017
Fantastic to read your eloquent response, Jamie. Completely rebutts this nonsencial rubbish that MH has to be the school to go to, or even that the oral method is the only one that will lead people towards towards, I was hearing just the other day of a lad at Hamilton Lodge school in Brighton who has gained twelve GCSEs. It doesn’t all happen at MH. Thank you.
Tim
December 15, 2017
As an ex MHGS (latter 80s) pupil, I second Linda’s endorsement of Jamie’s great comment.
Like Doug Alker, I feel I got a decent (not bad) education in spite of oralism, not because of it.
Now my BSL is far from perfect, but with it I can understand far more and learning is fun. I didn’t understand about 3/4 of what was said in the oral-only MH classroom.
Mary Hare – please just go with bi-lingual and ditch this pig-headed adherence to oralism.
Linda Richards
December 15, 2017
Typo in above comment. (Don’t write comments on mobiles in trains!)
Should read… “…that the oral method is the only one that will lead people towards qualifications.”
Chris Bradley
December 15, 2017
I wasn’the going to watch this programme cos I knew it would bring back bad memories of my (mainstream) schooling.
Couldn’the resist it though.
I think on the whole these deaf youngsters were lucky to be in that environment and although there is an argument that they might struggle in the hearing world it would have been an amazing start to life
Hartmut Teuber
December 15, 2017
I sent a response but it is mot here. What gives?
I wrote an anecdote about the graduate of the MHGS Pat Abrams and how she defied the school’s attempt to (ab)use her for Public Relations purposes to promote the school’s educational philosophy.
Linda Richards
December 15, 2017
Hello Hartmut, if it helps, I definitely read your post but I couldn’t tell you if it was on here or on one of the many other arenas (Facebook) where this topic was being discussed.
Hartmut Teuber
December 16, 2017
Hello, I don’t do Facebook and Twitter (also on other social media platforms). I only post in discussion forums and delivers comments to newspaper articles as a letter to editor. I wrote an anecdote about a former student of MHGS Pat Abrams who showed her defiance against her speech teacher. I will repeat the anecdote in the next post.
Hartmut Teuber
December 16, 2017
One additional note to the anecdote:
I retold the story in a linguistic conference without giving the name ten years later. An alumna of the school recognized the story and asked, if I was about Pat Abrams.
So the story must be of an incident that actually happened at MGHS.
Tim
December 16, 2017
Hey, Hartmut, it’s under the earlier article entitled ‘Ahead of tonight’s C4 documentary, how do Deaf people view Mary Hare School?’ Hth.
Linda Richards
December 16, 2017
In defence of TLC’s editor, I’ve never known him to censor anything. If it’s not appropriate, he will contact the people concerned. Glad Tim was able to pinpoint where you had originally posted this.
The Open University has very old video material about lipreading (probably dating back to the early 1970s) and it included lioreading exercises. The fallacy of lipreading was exposed when it turned out the material had all been spoken in Russian.
Penny Smart
December 16, 2017
Great programme and aryical. Sutton Council are proposing to close our primary and secondary bases for our children who use sign to support their speech, They feel all a Deaf Children can be educated in mainstream. Hope they watched and learnt something from it.
If you would like to come and do an article /documentary on how local government are letting down Deaf Children without realising the impact on all aspects of their early identity ,education and socialisation.
Please see my go fund page for more details
Gf.me/u/byis92
Tim
December 16, 2017
Some people will lavish praise on D/deaf people who go to Mary Hare, while looking down their noses at those who did not.
Conversely, others will lavish praise on D/deaf people who didn’t go to Mary Hare, while looking down their noses at those who did.
They are as bad as each other; both groups divisive snobs.
kmccready
December 16, 2017
Unfortunately the video uses the extraordinarily bad Adobe Flashplayer format which won’t play on my computer. I can’t find the vid on youtube either. Has anyone got an mp4 version via dropbox or something?
Hartmut Teuber
December 16, 2017
Here is the anecdote that was told me from an alumnus of MHGS:
Pat Abrams was known to be excellent in speech. She was then chosen by the speech teacher to read aloud a section from the New Testament that was to be read in a Sunday’s service, which was open to the public. She underwent a rehearsal with the teacher on the day before while her class mates did some sports and games. Come Sunday, she marched upfront to read the section. No one could understand her speech! The speech teacher was aghast. Only her French teacher applauded, for she spoke in French. The narrator added what Abrams said afterwards by saying, “Nobody understood what was read at the service, so I might do it in French as well.”
An act of defiance against the oralistic emphasis at the school.
Ken Jones
December 17, 2017
Pat read modern languages at Manchester university. A lovely person. I think it was head teacher Ken Pearce who partially broke the oralist mould by encouraging pupils to attend the Oxford Deaf club in the late 1970s/’80s.
Tracey
December 18, 2017
My reaction to the programme was complete surprise that the school taught in English and not BSL. It gives the impression that d/Deaf people can cope perfectly well with English (clearly not) and so why bother to provide comms support? I agree with the earlier comment about ensuring d/Deaf children get the same level of education as hearies – there are enough barriers to work for us as it is (see Action on Hearing Loss research papers). Maybe it would be good if “Employable Me” team could include a deafie?
All that said, I do think having places like MH is important, just can’t understand why they are insisting on English for lessons.
Chris Bradley
December 31, 2017
Sort of quote from GCSE physics….resistors connected in parallel have a combined resistance gathered by the sum of the reciprocals of each resistor. The resulting resistance is also a reciprocal.
The opposite is true of capacitors. Total capacitance of 2 or more capacitors connected in series will reqire the sum of the recipracals of the individual capacitances resulting in a reciprocal answer.
I got a headache trying to translate that into BSL so feel really stupid